Chinese Engine Development

Krabat1976

New Member
Given the current discussion going on, on this topic, would it be safe to say that the WS-10's full-rate production is in-line with J-10B's production commencement? Also, which WS-10 engine variant is earmarked for the J-10B? Is it the WS-10G or something else?
On chinese forum I've read that chinese are working on improved versions of WS10, producing more thrust than the standard 132kn, and that *could* be related to J10b. The last interview of a chinese official (last year if i remember correctly) regarding J10b stated that J10b was without an engine at the moment, so the delay on J10b production is maybe engine related due to intense work to improve WS10.
 

Schumacher

Senior Member
You need to do the basics like looking at how many J10As and old Flankers that can only use AL31 PLAAF still have and consider factors like the short lives and reliability issues of AL31 so more spares are needed.
Then you'll see why China still ordering AL31s has little to do with WS10.


Looks like China has failed to ramp up the scale on WS10A as of June 2012 as troubled by uneven quality. They might able produce in some batches but in mass scale, doesn't look like they can make it and it becoming a huge embarrasement to the political party and government.

False positive is a dangerous thing. Forget the west, China's current production rate is even lower than the Russian's.

Why Russia Has China By The Engines
by James Dunnigan
June 2, 2012 China has long copied foreign technology, not always successfully. One of these unsuccessful efforts is becoming a major embarrassment, to the point where government officials are complaining about it openly. While the Chinese ..............................
 
Last edited by a moderator:

kroko

Senior Member
Just some of your usual western media wet dreams to help their fanboys sleep at night. :)
You need to do the basics like looking at how many J10As and old Flankers that can only use AL31 PLAAF still have and consider factors like the short lives and reliability issues of AL31 so more spares are needed.
Then you'll see why China still ordering AL31s has little to do with WS10.

Perhabs you are right. I think that J-11B and J-10B are the only PLAAF planes that can be equipped with WS-10. We have seen one J-15 prototype with WS-10 but not the others. Even J-20 prototypes may be carrying russian engine.

J-10A and old flankers (the vast majority of modern PLAAF fighters) must still be equipped with russian engines. And russian engines usually dont last long. Maybe thats why china is always ordering russian engines.
 

paintgun

Senior Member
to play the devil's advocate regarding the above

why would PLAAF prioritize WS-10 for the J-11s instead for the fully indigenous J-10? the J-10 is highly profiled and pride of the nation

perhaps it was because of Shenyang Liming, or it was to risky to put a new engine on a single engined aircraft
now that the engine has matured and mass production begun, what's stopping them

the total tally of J-11B produced every year shouldn't exceed 50 (one-two regiments per year?), and we can include the brand new J-11BS and J-15
that's a total of ~100 engines in production volume, i am sure they can produce more than that, while the Russians are getting more contract in the hundreds. That number alone shows China is behind Russia in regards to production volume.
 

Deino

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
Maybe thats why china is always ordering russian engines.

Not maybe ! TAHT's the one and only simple reason ... and as far as I remember it was even reported that way that these latest Russian engines were only to replace older ones.

As such not again taking this as "China" builds unrealiable engines, China has production rate issues ... simply these Russian ones have their service life expired.

Deino
 

Lion

Senior Member
to play the devil's advocate regarding the above

why would PLAAF prioritize WS-10 for the J-11s instead for the fully indigenous J-10? the J-10 is highly profiled and pride of the nation

perhaps it was because of Shenyang Liming, or it was to risky to put a new engine on a single engined aircraft
now that the engine has matured and mass production begun, what's stopping them

the total tally of J-11B produced every year shouldn't exceed 50 (one-two regiments per year?), and we can include the brand new J-11BS and J-15
that's a total of ~100 engines in production volume, i am sure they can produce more than that, while the Russians are getting more contract in the hundreds. That number alone shows China is behind Russia in regards to production volume.

Russia and China relationship are all time high. China leader do not forsee any breakdown sooner. Russian AL-31FN engines price maybe very competitive. They try to raise the price of IL-76 deal with China but did not work. Rather than killing off its customers , giving PLAAF a competitive price and keep them is the better solution. As you all know, PLAAF is still very frugent despite increasing budget. They will find all means possible to keep things cheap. Continue using AL-31FN engine without modification will keep J-10A real affordable.

Also Shenyand Liming which is responsible for WS-10A is a direct rival for Chengdu J-10. Priority for their own J-11B series is understandable. That is the reason why chengdu J-20 WS-15 engine project has move to Guizhou to handle rather than letting Shenyang Liming to continue the next generation engine project.
 

Schumacher

Senior Member
to play the devil's advocate regarding the above

why would PLAAF prioritize WS-10 for the J-11s instead for the fully indigenous J-10? the J-10 is highly profiled and pride of the nation

perhaps it was because of Shenyang Liming, or it was to risky to put a new engine on a single engined aircraft
now that the engine has matured and mass production begun, what's stopping them
....................

Well, it's simple. J10A, & J10S the twin seaters, were designed from more than a decade ago to use AL31 ONLY, no WS10, period.
Only the new J10B which is not in production yet can use WS10. Does PLAAF really need to invest to modify an old design like J10A to use WS10 ? when production will probably end soon ? When AL31 can be had for relatively cheap prices ?
 

paintgun

Senior Member
you have a point, when the J-10A was designed they had only AL-31FN at hand

what might seem simple at first, retrofitting the J-10As for the WS-10 and switching current production J-10A to WS-10 will be expensive and prohibitive (they also need to modify the WS-10)

i am not sure if it is correct to put J-10As design as 'old' as even the earlier Bs use AL-31FN themselves, only the latest 1035 came with WS-10

and then we arrive at another point, when the first production batch of J-10Bs start rolling off the factory, whether they use WS-10 or not, that can be another yard stick for the WS-10
 

kroko

Senior Member
That is the reason why chengdu J-20 WS-15 engine project has move to Guizhou to handle rather than letting Shenyang Liming to continue the next generation engine project.

Do you have any source that says that WS-15 is being developed by guizhou ??
 

latenlazy

Brigadier
more mind boggling is the Russian's manufacturing process is not that precise and well controlled yet their production rate of AL-31 is still higher than China's WS10A.


China should instead bring the issue to the forefront as a national study project let more people in the industry and academics to scrutinize what has gone wrong rather than keep everything wrapped inside AVIC.

Or, perhaps they are able to turn out more turbofans because they're not as precise in their manufacturing.

---------- Post added at 04:25 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:12 PM ----------

personally i can't justify the use of word 'new' to the WS-10/A anymore, this is an engine already under long development cycle and surely has clocked many hours with the J-11s

admittedly or not (by the officials) there must be some hurdles along the mass production of WS-10/A, not problems in the technicality or design of the engine itself, which should be satisfactory for the PLAAF to induct it for operations

if one look into to the roadmap and plans for future c919 engines, there would be little or perhaps none trickle down result benefited from the WS-10/A, and they decide to start a clean slate, but it is of course a pure conjecture

turbofans remains a challenge for China and PLA

I don't know if it's so much a hurdle we're bearing witness to now as it is an unavoidable reality of new production lines. Think about it this way. When you first begin the production of something, you need to build and set up the facilities, train the workers, get the right machines, etc. Then you need to work out the potential kinks you encounter along the way, such as whether your mass production methods are actually replicating your intended product. Then, when everything is sorted out and you're confident that everything is doing what it's supposed to, you need to build more facilities and train more workers. This all takes time, which equates to a lag in ramping up production. For China, this is especially true because they're new to the entire industry, which means they don't have previous facilities, machines, and work experience that can be re purposed. Everything must be done from scratch.

---------- Post added at 04:56 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:25 PM ----------

exactly, it should be a mature product by now within normal time frame. The fact that they still have production issue means alot. I am not sure if given another few years will solve it.

I mean design and manufacturing process go hand in hand, if the design is very robust and has alot of margins then it can withstand deficiency in the manufacturing process.

If they can't solve the production rate issue, Hey, they might have to go back to the drawing board to the design to increase the robustness of the design so it can better absorb deficiency in other areas.

Turbofans by their very nature are not robust with a lot of margins for error, so it's somewhat pointless to just say "let's make this design more robust!". Every major turbofan maker today took decades to get where they're at now.

---------- Post added at 04:57 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:56 PM ----------

Both Dunnigan and Erickson's articles pointed to the late 2011 or in 2012 the production rate is below what's needed and they are frustrated and had to ordered additional AL-31 engines.

China has alot more manpower and resources than Russia, and if their production rate is far lower than Russian's , then I would say that kind of production probably is not acceptable for nation of that size.

Manpower is really useless if you don't also have the knowledge, facilities, and machines to utilize that manpower, which is exactly the problem any industry newcomers have, no matter how much manpower is there.

---------- Post added at 05:05 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:57 PM ----------

to play the devil's advocate regarding the above

why would PLAAF prioritize WS-10 for the J-11s instead for the fully indigenous J-10? the J-10 is highly profiled and pride of the nation

perhaps it was because of Shenyang Liming, or it was to risky to put a new engine on a single engined aircraft
now that the engine has matured and mass production begun, what's stopping them

the total tally of J-11B produced every year shouldn't exceed 50 (one-two regiments per year?), and we can include the brand new J-11BS and J-15
that's a total of ~100 engines in production volume, i am sure they can produce more than that, while the Russians are getting more contract in the hundreds. That number alone shows China is behind Russia in regards to production volume.
I think it's not the end of reliability tests yet. You often don't feel completely safe with a new design until you've used it through its life expectancy and have had several samples to compare. That's probably one reason they're equipping it on the J-11s first. The other reasons could be related to the relative age of the two fleets.

Production volume and production hiccups are not necessarily equatable. Russia is going to have a higher production volume simply because it has more facilities and more experienced workers than China in turbofan manufacturing, which comes from it being in the field longer and having already matured the necessary investments. After all, it takes time for investment money to turn into material differences.
 
Top