Chinese Economics Thread

Wrought

Junior Member
Registered Member
As expected, the Ministry of Commerce told Trump to go pound sand regarding his latest threats. Details presumably to follow.

美方对华加征所谓“对等关税”毫无根据,是典型的单边霸凌做法,中方已经采取的反制措施是为了维护自身主权安全发展利益,维护正常的国际贸易秩序,完全是正当之举。美方威胁升级对华关税,是错上加错,再次暴露了美方的讹诈本质,中方对此绝不接受。如果美方一意孤行,中方必将奉陪到底。

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Wenren

New Member
Registered Member

Hang Seng Index dropped a lot today. 14 points, last I heard.
Friday was Qingming, a public holiday. So you are seeing 2 down days compressed into 1, hence the bigger fall. Chill, no need to panic.

Also, the fund managers globally have been hit by margin calls from excessive volatility. When you need to raise cash, you sell anything and everything - the most liquid stuff gets sold first to meet the urgent need for cash. hence even gold takes a hit.
 

GiantPanda

Junior Member
Registered Member
I don't understand why the Chinese indices have sunk lower than the US ones.

Shouldn't the US market be at greater risk of harm from the various tariffs on all of its trade partners than China who only has one significant trade partner affected?

I get capital flowing to the US for safety in a turbulent market, but China very obviously has less risk and even some upside with erstwhile US trade partners trading more with China.

You should see how the Chinese stock market fell to shit during the greatest economic expansion in human history! The Shanghai Index dropped 50% between 2000 and 2004 when China entered the WTO and the real economy was growing at almost double digits. It then went and did nearly 50% drops two other times (after massive run-ups.)

It has always been a casino with little connection to the actual economy.
 

manqiangrexue

Brigadier
China doesn't have much of its economy in the stock market and the ones that are listed there are the more vibes based companies generally, or limited portions of bigger companies.

Stock market in US matters because that's the retirement/social security fund for a shit ton of people. In China, that role is served by other public funded interests.
It's actually amazing how we see the wisdom of the CCP decades after its policies.

Long ago, people lamented China's limits preventing Google from dominating China with its world-beating services. When Trump came to office in 2016 and the bans started to target Chinese tech, we saw how smart and important that decision was, otherwise America could fry the nerves of our tech industries.

Now, we had people lament how China's financing is behind and doesn't have a robust stock market where people trust to put all their savings into for long term appreciation and can rely on growing old. Now we see why that's a great idea in a full scale trade war.
 

lube

Junior Member
Registered Member
Pardon my ignorance in economics, but why does econ Twitter blame Michael Pettis — and to a lesser extent Brad Setser — for laying the theoretical groundwork behind Trump’s current economic policies (i.e., economic warfare against the ROW?)



You have articles saying how Michael Pettis is being read by the Trump team, because it provides them with intellectual backing for bad ideas.

They're economic cranks talking non-stop about global trade imbalances (conveniently ignoring services) as the literal explanation for 99% of all bad things happening around the world. Tariff the bad people and the problem will go away.
 

henrik

Senior Member
Registered Member
Given that a lot of the ships are made in China, that along with the tariffs could be a huge supply shock, probably something that hasn't been seen in decades.

But the thing is that all the biggest carriers already own some Chinese made ships. Even if the ship making the port call is not made in China, they will still impose a fee a long as the carrier has Chinese made ships in its fleet?
 
Top