Chinese Economics Thread

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

In this same interview US Ambassador to China Nicholas Burns says US companies are fleeing and not investing in China and yet he says also none of them are leaving because they don't want to abandon a 1.4 billion person market. All the companies that are still in China are investing into expansion in China.

The US has to lie to everyone in the world to keep everyone in-line. They can't even keep their promises to the island of Palau because they're now threatening to run over to China because the US is not keeping their word for being virulently being anti-China for them. Now how much pocket change was it the US couldn't afford to give them? And the US thinks it's doing great when they can't even give its own closest allies an economic boost by giving them more market access? If the US is doing great, they would be able to do these things with ease but they can't.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

In fact, the US has not changed its positioning of China as a "strategic competitor," nor has it changed its actions to "invest, align, and compete" regarding China. This can be seen in Burns' remarks in the CBS interview that China wants to "become and overtake the US as the dominant country globally" and the two countries' militaries are "vying for military supremacy." It needs to be said that China's economic development, scientific and technological progress and its desire to play a greater role in global affairs are labeled as the pursuit of global hegemony, which not only distorts the truth but also exposes the nature of Washington's own hegemonic thinking. It is not surprising that US public opinion, dominated by this kind of thinking, hypes the "China peak" theory at one time and the "China threat" at another.
 

Randomuser

Senior Member
Registered Member
Xiaomi and Oppo are really pathetic. They are just passively waiting until the US also cuts their access to chips like lambs to the slaughter.
They should at least be funding the Chinese semi industry so they have actual alternatives.
Been googling AI and Semiconductor companies in China lately. Maybe they're not heard of now because many don't even have a wiki page or whatever, but assuming thing proceed as normal, you're probably going to see quite a few of them become famous in the future.

The whole assumption tsmc is gonna be here forever is misguided. Shall we not forget that Tsmc itself only became high profile in recent years?
 

Serb

Junior Member
Registered Member
Global Times demolishes Westoid media propaganda with data once more. More facts, less ideology, and wishful thinking.




7ef5457d-5b0f-4da0-a049-85bfbba21635.jpg
 

FairAndUnbiased

Brigadier
Registered Member
Global Times demolishes Westoid media propaganda with data once more. More facts, less ideology, and wishful thinking.




7ef5457d-5b0f-4da0-a049-85bfbba21635.jpg
Why proud of McDonalds of all things. Obesity??? Disease???

Nestle is one of the most controversial companies in the world.

What's there to be proud of buying Apple?
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


I am not sure what new technology or management techniques L'Oreal brings either.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


I may be misunderstanding but what part of this is good news??? Countries don't brag about how much Saudi princes invest in them because rightfully, it is perceived as bad for their image.

I don't see how allowing carcinogenic and obesity products in China as something to be proud of.
 

Serb

Junior Member
Registered Member
Why proud of McDonalds of all things. Obesity??? Disease???

Nestle is one of the most controversial companies in the world.

What's there to be proud of buying Apple?
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


I am not sure what new technology or management techniques L'Oreal brings either.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


I may be misunderstanding but what part of this is good news??? Countries don't brag about how much Saudi princes invest in them because rightfully, it is perceived as bad for their image.

I don't see how allowing carcinogenic and obesity products in China as something to be proud of.


Maybe Western ppl are more familiar with those companies, so it is more intuitive and easier for them to understand in that way if it is dumbed down.

(If they are the target audience for this infographic which to me it looks like they are. You need to speak 'on their level' to be understood better).

And I have a big hunch that there is no way Chinese authorities actually allow such cancerogenic and negative greedy behavior inside of China as those companies can do in the West.

That is not only because they are foreign companies, but I feel like that people are protected from the predatory practices of the corporate sector as a whole.

After all, in China, the government controls its private sector and mega-corporations, whereas in the West, those huge corporations control their govs.
 

getready

Senior Member
My experience with Luckin Coffee is that it is mainly a take-away coffee service. Some stores don't have sit-down areas; others just have a small table or two.

It is a different experience from Starbucks, which is big on the sitting-down atmosphere and the experience. They target two different audiences, with Luckin Coffee more downscale.

The coffee itself is fine.
Once watched a documentary on them. Dun know how accurate. But says their biz model is based on huge number of takeaway delivery orders to office based customers that the coffee is not bad quality and more reasonably priced.

Also how they thrived is introducing way more new experimental drinks to tempt customers. Some became runaway hits and made alot of profit for them. Quite different overall from Starbucks model. Saw many YouTube videos of star bucks flagship store in shanghai where they process their own coffee beans there and I thought it was ridiculous but apparently it attracts plenty of tourists
 
Top