you only have to be better than others. good is relative.
when the other side has their youth slaving away at McDonalds or coal mines for minimum wage, while yours have the freedom to pursue their own interests, who is really winning?
This is literally the first response you had for '21% unemployment rate'. Your pathetic attempt to argue against this is literally to suggest: "I know I am but what are you?" in various ways and forms. Very convincing.
What facts? I included public data with my claims. In contrast I didn't see any links to public data from him.
He then claimed that his points are substantiated by classified or censored data that you can only get via WeChat from someone you know that's on the inside.
Chinese Economics Thread
https://www.thenationalnews.com/business/markets/2023/06/12/china-to-receive-up-to-2tn-in-middle-east-sovereign-investments-by-2030-hkex-ceo-says/ China to receive up to $2tn in Middle East sovereign investments by 2030, HKEX CEO says China, the world’s second-largest economy, is set to...www.sinodefenceforum.com
The irony is he trusts the 20% unemployment rate, which is not classified or censored.
Literally read what the experts in China are saying, and understand that you assembling together a series of slides/deck to confirmation-bias yourself into believing you are correct isn't going to change reality. By the way, *amazing* job comparing OECD unemployment rates without understanding that the definition of unemployment is not the same across countries. But of course, if you actually read the article above, you would've known that.
The increase in graduate enrollment is a reflection of the difficulty of getting a job after finishing undergraduate studies. And the irony is that you citing 'increased enrollment' in higher tier schooling as a strength, is actually a bigger problem in the future.