broadsword
Brigadier
Chinese nationalism is breathtaking. It's an honor.
You confuse a crutch with a strength. America's tactics are used because it is not confident in its own ability to grow. Therefore, the only way to expand is to keep more and more dogs and servants, often hanging by the threads of bribery and threat. Never depend on others for what you can do yourself. China, on the other hand, has so much more potential for growth, it's really just starting out. China can afford to spend its days in the gym getting stronger and stronger but America is basically not seeing anymore results (rather sometimes, it's in decline) so instead, it spends its days whipping slaves to help it fight. China is in a far more enviable position as an alliances are, in nature, weak. NATO does not have any coherent or effective response against a single Russia as every nation that comprises it must make sure that its individual needs are met and that is critical to them above group unity. Alliances are just like secrets; one kept by 2 friends is one of steel, by 3 is of iron, by 4 of wood, and by 5 of clay. China's ability to grow with self-dependence is as strong as diamond.America's population is much lower than China's but it compensates/tries to compensate through other factors, such as by building alliances. For example, the "Quad" tries to turn India against China. Now all of a sudden America will never have a cannon fodder shortage. The alliance with Europe means the NATO + Japan economy will dwarf China's even if China's GDP is bigger than the US alone. Etc. Of course, China can pursue the same strategies if it wants but right now it's not as good at it as the US. The US + EU + Japan are 50% of the world economy that they will undoubtedly collectively sanction Russia/China if the latter two get out of line (or in the case of Russia, are already doing so). While NATO alone is 950 million people.
Combined Europe + Japan + Taiwan + South Korea + Canada + Australia + New Zealand + USA have a nominal GDP around 56.5 trillion dollars. China has around 18 trillion. By 2050 China should have two-thirds of their total economic size in nominal and should be equaling them in PPP. There are a few things China should do:Then it seems like it's about ~50/~130 trillion.
So US, EU and Japan is 39ish% of world gdp per ppp.
Again though, we can't just take a number like that (neither with the former 50% based on nominal), in reality things are 'murkier'.
But there's a trend of the west being a smaller % of world gdp (both nominal and ppp).
It's all going to become Russian soon.Not a bad idea to dispose Western assets as the risk has increased.
Jai Hinds are not that dumb as you think, they already gave a huge middle finger to the West in the current Russia-Ukraine debacle. They will do some chest-beating as usual but won't act as a cannon fodder for the US, lol. The West stealing Russian assets and reserves was a huge wake-up call for many "neutral" countries - Saudi Arabia started talking about diversifying their investments in the US and trading oil in Yuans, all of this is supported by them starting negotiations with Iran and a ceasefire in Yemen; UAE recently hosted Assad; India is moving to shift their trade with Russia from dollars to rupee + ruble; etc.America's population is much lower than China's but it compensates/tries to compensate through other factors, such as by building alliances. For example, the "Quad" tries to turn India against China. Now all of a sudden America will never have a cannon fodder shortage. The alliance with Europe means the NATO + Japan economy will dwarf China's even if China's GDP is bigger than the US alone. Etc. Of course, China can pursue the same strategies if it wants but right now it's not as good at it as the US. The US + EU + Japan are 50% of the world economy that they will undoubtedly collectively sanction Russia/China if the latter two get out of line (or in the case of Russia, are already doing so). While NATO alone is 950 million people.
Paywall, can anyone post?
Paywall, can anyone post?