Another reason might be that the CCP realizes that it does not enjoy unconditional approval from the Chinese people? If yes, that might explain why the CCP may be more concerned with suppressing dissent at home and keeping the masses ignorant of the outside world through the Great Firewall than dealing with external challenges posed by the USA or India.
Oh no, you are trying to explain what is not there. No government enjoys unconditional approval from its people but the CCP continuously earns it by being the top performing government in the world. No other country has cut down the American lead like China has under the CCP and India is basically being given a bloody nose whenever they overstep. These are the CCP's top priorities other than developing the country. American politics, however, prioritize the election, trash talking the other side, making democrats and republicans hate each other in internal strife. These countries are the polar opposite.
Limitation of military options, technological backwardness might be other limiting factors. China has been playing catch up for decades and this process will continue for decades to come, if it ever comes to a halt at all.
This is your wishful thinking. Every trend in every tech shows China emerging from the abyss to the top. We are at the overtake point in some, and many others, we are already past. Only an analyst speaking from sheer desire to the point that he would willingly be blind would say that China would play catchup possibly forever.
It's easier for authoritarian states to copy or imitate leading countries but not provide new ideas or novel working methods or technological breakthroughs or scientific theories and concepts that shatter old myths.
But that has nothing to do with China because Chinese innovation is at the top of the world with patents, industrial patents, emerging tech, etc...
Even a democratic, Western aligned Japan could never out innovate, outcompete the Americans. That says something.
That says that it's very hard for a country to keep up with another one that has 3x its population. Now what does that mean for the US in the current context? LOL But even with so little, they came close, and if there were 10 Japans in one country, well... that would be a different story that would have ended disastrously for the Americans.
American style suburban lifestyle is not necessarily the ideal that Chinese should aspire to. To each his own, I suppose. You may be a bit too harsh on the Chinese. Despite too much propaganda from the CCP and from the American establishment, China is in no way, shape or form, a major challenger to the American throne.
Of what? Housing size? OK. But in tech, military, and economy, China is in every aspect.
To topple the Americans is to topple Western civilization.
Deal
The Chinese, much like the Japanese before them or the Soviets, are not up to this task.
You have selected another group people people who are very few compared to the Chinese.
The CCP is probably more focused on improving the livelihoods of the Chinese peoples so as to avoid popular unrest. Such a social contract which requires that popular unrest can be bought off for improving livelihoods is not expected or accepted in countries where government has to fear the people. Such contracts can only work in countries where the people live in fear of the government. Such a country, like the former Soviet Union, can never topple the United States, which would mean toppling Western civilization.
That's just Disney fantasy talk. Any country can topple any other country if that country grows its economic, military and technological power faster, and that is exactly what China is doing.
This is the hard reality which you, or many members here and many people outside the confines of this forum, may find hard to accept but the sooner you do accept it, the earlier you will find comfort in knowing what the future holds on a macroscale.
The hard reality that Americans and its supporters must come to realize is that China is unlike any other challenge that the US has ever faced. Everything else was a midget compared to China, the civilization that was a dominant power for longer than any other force in history. Comparing China to Japan or the Soviets is just American whistling past the graveyard to calm its own nerves. "I beat that kid in the playground yesterday; last week I even took on a 5th grader and won. This fight with Tyson tomorrow is gonna be a breeze; he'll go down just like all the rest." LOL
Soviet Union could never outcompete the United States. Vladimir Putin admitted as much. Japan could not.
So that's 2 times when a smaller population lost to a larger one. Soon, we'll see a third.
Except for population, which the United States can/has easily countered thanks to its undisputed leadership of the entire Western civilization and sometimes, selectively handpicking the brightest of talents from third world territories, there is no enduring advantage China enjoys over the United States.
Not correct. China's advantage is the largest population of the kind of people who have an ethic to work hard, a culture to heavily persue STEM, and the genetics to top every mathematical competition in the world. America, on the other hand, is full of people who just want to be fat and happy, study communications or hosplitality, and hate on anyone who does better. China's all about developing China; America is all about stopping China from developing China. Everyone is about China because all the potential for growth is in China.
China will continue to be laggards for decades to come. You are free to argue otherwise. I am all ears. There is no scope for perverse ideas like racism in this debate, I think.
Well, you can't be
all ears since you're at least 90% far-fetched wishes LOL Already argued it. The trends don't support your wish.
I am not talking about the morality of it since I know for a fact how evil or depraved the US or its allies can be. The question is why it still continues to lead despite all the mistakes it has made and despite it being a nation only 250 years old.
Obviously because it has had a very long head start, which China is cutting down by the day.
Middle East or South East Asia or Latin America, Africa are areas with a complete freehand enjoyed by the Americans. Except maybe the ASEAN countries sharing land border with China who may "give China some face", no other country in ASEAN can and would openly challenge the Americans. None of them are big enough, advanced enough, populous enough to do it. Same holds true for the Middle East, Latin America, Africa and Europe, I might add. Even though Europe as a continent consists of developed countries to a large extent with high human development indices, individual Euroepan countries are small and thus susceptible to American pressure, which might also be called bullying. There is no substitute for population in geopolitics. There is not a single instance of a small country, no matter how developed its human capital or institutions or economy or technological base might be, that can independently pursue policies with fear of repercussion from the Americans. None.
North Korea can. But why do you bring up instances of America bullying small countries? We know that about America; it has nothing to do with its prospects against China.
For China, the enduring advantage is only its population.
And this from above:
"Not correct. China's advantage is the largest population of the kind of people who have an ethic to work hard, a culture to heavily persue STEM, and the genetics to top every mathematical competition in the world."
China's enduring advantage is momentum; it is moving faster than any other nation or even conglomerate of nations in tech.
In every other indicator, so far, it seems China not only lags but there is no possibility of China surpassing the Americans in decades to come.
This is just a joke seeing how many technological fields in which China has already surpassed the Americans and how many other places China is moving faster and on the cusp of an overtake. You might as well take that sentence and insert any two random countries and it would be at least as true as your current sentence.
That being said, best wishes to the Chinese.
Keep them; we rely on our intellect and hard work, not any false-hearted wishes.