doesn't matter, foreign countries will be eating the increased costs in the end. this also provides market mechanisms to force additional purchases of non-fossil electricity and boosts funding for non-fossil electricity research and construction. It is short term pain for long term gain.
Easy fossil fuel and lax emission regulations is a crutch just like cheap credit was a crutch for uncompetitive and uninnovative companies like Evergrande. Just wait 5-10 years and see who is leading in energy and who is still clinging to their dreams of clean coal and gas cars.
China is not a place that lacks anything but motivation. Once a motive is given, it will be done.
Ecological and climate change commitments are only the context of the current problem with energy, not their cause. The government is trying to hold down inflation (successfully, so far) at a time when there is a sharp surge in commodity prices. They seem to have scored a victory on iron ore recently, largely through releasing stockpiles into the market. They have also released oil reserves into the market, though I don't know the results. Coal, in any case, is a hard nut to crack for some reason, and the government has simply refused to allow an increase in electricity rates. This means the power generators lose money on fuel, and they either don't want to or are unable to bite the bullet.The problem is this kind of arbitrary, abrupt administrative measures are terrible means to achieve the goals. Better to use market mechanism to signal and implement the policy goals in this case.
In the last few days there has been some initiative to increase coal production in China. Reopen closed mines? or just increase output of existing ones?
This type of stuff has happened before, I believe with gasoline shortages when the government was forcing sinopec and others to swallow the high price of oil (around 2008?). So it is not optimal, but I don't think it is arbitrary either.
Last edited: