antiterror13
Brigadier
Dunno. I suppose they want to increase consumption but not on excessive US levels
Perhaps local consumption and NOT luxury goods
Dunno. I suppose they want to increase consumption but not on excessive US levels
Perhaps Responsible Consumption.Perhaps local consumption and NOT luxury goods
Now they are saying they are not relying on consumption. How do they implement internal circulation, if they are discouraging too much consumption?
Robots and automation will help China maintain its position as the world's factory and dominant exporter. However, robots will not be able to replace consumers in China's consumer market (after all, robots do not consume, they only produce); hence, China will either need to boost the number of consumers, or boost the individual purchasing power for each consumer, to ensure its large consumer market can keep growing. Otherwise, robots will only help insofar as growing manufacturing exports to other markets, and I'm pretty sure the government is keen to avoid the dangers of increasing export dependency.
Vaccination Update: China, based on Friday's numbers, had the 3rd-fastest per-capita vaccination rate increase in the world.
As of Friday, 5/14, a cumulative 380.63 million doses of vaccines have been administered in China:
China administered almost 14 million new vaccine doses on Friday, the highest recorded daily vaccination rate yet:
Robots and automation will help China maintain its position as the world's factory and dominant exporter. However, robots will not be able to replace consumers in China's consumer market (after all, robots do not consume, they only produce); hence, China will either need to boost the number of consumers, or boost the individual purchasing power for each consumer, to ensure its large consumer market can keep growing. Otherwise, robots will only help insofar as growing manufacturing exports to other markets, and I'm pretty sure the government is keen to avoid the dangers of increasing export dependency.
Why would Chinese stop consuming if their wages continue to rise? The robots will produce enough to support a reasonably comfortable lifestyle for the average citizen, who might only need to work 4 hours a day. Later, the robotic productivity will be so great that the people will have a high standard of living -- by working 4 hours a day. As long as the country's resources are able to support the growth -- or technology improves to get more from resources -- I see no reason that China should not become a rich country. This is decades in the future, of course.Robots and automation will help China maintain its position as the world's factory and dominant exporter. However, robots will not be able to replace consumers in China's consumer market (after all, robots do not consume, they only produce); hence, China will either need to boost the number of consumers, or boost the individual purchasing power for each consumer, to ensure its large consumer market can keep growing. Otherwise, robots will only help insofar as growing manufacturing exports to other markets, and I'm pretty sure the government is keen to avoid the dangers of increasing export dependency.