Engineer
Major
This is similar to free-speech and free-speech zones. You can protest in free-speech zones, but the government can make sure they are located in far away places so you will not be heard. And since when did became private properties?Umm, it makes a massive difference. For example, I have a right to protest in my back garden - I don't have a right to break into yours and protest there.
You keep harping about democracy and we will keep bringing up India. Why not? Just because India doesn't measure up to your fantasy, that doesn't mean it isn't a democracy and cannot be compared to. There is also Mexico, which ranks 98 on the , and Philippines, which ranked 134th. Both of these countries are also democracy, yet they are even worse off than China.Oh God, not more whining about India.
Guys, whatever chips you have on your shoulders about India, I suggest you get over it.
Singapore isn't strictly a democracy as the ruling party always wins majority in the house. It also has draconian laws that don't meet Western standards of respecting human rights. Yet, it is ranked 1st place on the Corruption Perceptions Index.
This is pure speculation. What is not a pure speculation is that China is not a democracy by Western standard, and it is better than India.China can be a better democracy than India.
This is the perfect-democracy fallacy.And don't pretend that India "suffers" from democracy just because it's big. Belgium is tiny, but had a caretaker government for 541 days. Seriously. Why? Because the way by which politicians are elected is flawed.
And you cannot ignore China's incredible rise. A whole country is rebuilt from scratch in 30 years and becomes one of the most powerful countries in the world. You can't denounce an entire political system just because it doesn't conform to how you were "taught" as to how a government should be run. China has massively benefited from its current political system and the accompanying independence and rise in standard-of-living, both are measurable as opposed to meaningless terms like freedom and democracy.But you're ignoring America's incredible rise. They built a whole country from scratch in double-quick time and became the most powerful country in the world. You can't denounce an entire political system just because there are sometimes disagreements on how to get things done. America has massively benefited from democracy and accompanying freedoms/rights.
Good is not synonyms of democratic system. If a country has something that China can learn from, China will learn from that country regardless of its political system. You are right that China is not shopping from a catalog with limited options, but you and people like you are trying to push a catalog with limited options onto China.How is any of that relevant to this discussion? We're talking about change in China today. China doesn't have to introduce 18th century "democracy". It can just grant modern democratic rights and freedoms to everyone. As I said earlier, China can choose how to bring in reform. It's not shopping from a catalogue with limited options, it can look at all the democratic systems in the world and pull good aspects from all of them.
For example, I would go with a parliamentary system. The president would have limited powers for emergency situations. He or she could be directly elected or appointment by parliament.
MPs would be elected by first past the post, making it easier for a party or parties to form a stable majority government. Parliament would also select the PM, who would be the nation's leader. This would avoid the situation in the US where the president doesn't necessarily have a majority in Congress. And that's just for starters.
There is no perfect political system, but China is in an enviable position of being able to pick and choose the means for which it will become a proper democracy.
This is a complete fantasy of yours. Let's stick to reality. What China needs is a functional system, not proper democracy.