Chinese Aviation Industry

by78

General
Two new developments from the Chinese electric VTOL aircraft maker
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Electric vertical take-off and landing (eVTOL) aircraft took a huge leap forward after the firm AutoFlight set a new world record for the longest recorded eVTOL flight in February. The air taxi prototype ‘Prosperity I’ traveled 155 miles on a single battery charge, claiming the world record for longest recorded flight for an Electric vertical take-off and landing (eVTOL) aircraft. The test flight of the Prosperity I eVTOL, an ‘air taxi’, or ‘flying taxi’ prototype, achieved a distance of 155 miles (250 kilometers) on a single charge of the aircraft’s lithium-ion batteries, according to AutoFlight.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

AutoFlight, the Shanghai-headquartered global
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
pioneer, entered into a partnership deal with EVFLY, an air fleet management and operation company for the new generation of electric aircraft, for launch of the former’s aircraft in the Middle East region.

The deal envisages EVFLY initially purchasing 205 AutoFlight Prosperity I and Prosperity cargo aircraft, of which 10 will be deployed for operation in the Middle East.

The company will initially launch the services in the UAE and Saudi Arabia, with subsequent deployments in Asia and Africa, AutoFlight said in a statement.

The deal comes on the heels of AutoFlight’s record-breaking 250 km all-electric flight.

 

tphuang

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
Two new developments from the Chinese electric VTOL aircraft maker
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!



Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!



Western news service are definitely slow, I posted this 2 weeks ago


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
山河景航空科技 apparently ordered 260 back in August, so EVFLY won't be the largest customer
They are expecting to produce 1000 aircraft a year when their production base is complete, which is not bad at all.

It is a little weird that Chinese airlines are not ordering this. After all, Joby has been getting orders from US airlines.
 

Clark Gap

Junior Member
Registered Member
Western news service are definitely slow, I posted this 2 weeks ago


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
山河景航空科技 apparently ordered 260 back in August, so EVFLY won't be the largest customer
They are expecting to produce 1000 aircraft a year when their production base is complete, which is not bad at all.

It is a little weird that Chinese airlines are not ordering this. After all, Joby has been getting orders from US airlines.

Don't forget the horrible Chinese low-altitude airspace management regulations...
 

sunnymaxi

Major
Registered Member
This could have been asked before but why hasn't China teamed up with Russian passenger plane manufacturers and make planes together?

Examples.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
two reasons according to my analysis

1. different approach

to enter in global market of Civilian aircrafts with western suppliers. C919 already applied for European certificate.

2. national security

yes its true. despite very close relations with Russia, China doesn't want to dependent on Russia for this high tech industry. COMAC rejected three Russian offers to build engine in joint venture. and eventually went alone and we have CJ-1000/CJ-2000 propulsion now.

after Ukraine-Russia war, West impose sanctions. Russia proposed Non-western components plan for CR929 aircraft but COMAC rejected again. and now Russia become parts supplier instead of partner in this program.

edit - another most important thing, China building aviation foundation in Mainland , spending billions of RMB to cultivate talent , building infrastructure. want to become aviation powerhouse that will serve China in decades to come. they have set the target of 5 percent contribution from aviation in GDP by 2049
 
Last edited:

sahureka

Junior Member
Registered Member
two reasons according to my analysis

1. different approach

to enter in global market of Civilian aircrafts with western suppliers. C919 already applied for European certificate.

2. national security

yes its true. despite very close relations with Russia, China doesn't want to dependent on Russia for this high tech industry. COMAC rejected three Russian offers to build engine in joint venture. and eventually went alone and we have CJ-1000/CJ-2000 propulsion now.

after Ukraine-Russia war, West impose sanctions. Russia proposed Non-western components plan for CR929 aircraft but COMAC rejected again. and now Russia become parts supplier instead of partner in this program.

edit - another most important thing, China building aviation foundation in Mainland , spending billions of RMB to cultivate talent , building infrastructure. want to become aviation powerhouse that will serve China in decades to come. they have set the target of 5 percent contribution from aviation in GDP by 2049
but China must be very careful, the countries of the so-called West have the habit of imposing sanctions, even more when a nation becomes a competitor not only geopolitically but also precisely in the commercial aircraft production sector.
c919.png

What would happen to the C919 or ARJ21 if as with the Russian SSJ-100 the suppliers of parts are forced to refuse to supply them? Therefore, a problem that would also arise for the C929, only a completely national production would avoid it.
 

sunnymaxi

Major
Registered Member
but China must be very careful, the countries of the so-called West have the habit of imposing sanctions, even more when a nation becomes a competitor not only geopolitically but also precisely in the commercial aircraft production sector.
c919.png

What would happen to the C919 or ARJ21 if as with the Russian SSJ-100 the suppliers of parts are forced to refuse to supply them? Therefore, a problem that would also arise for the C929, only a completely national production would avoid it.
you know what, this picture is highly misleading.

if you have time please read last 50 or 70 pages of this thread.

C919 60 percent components/parts/subsystems have been localized as of 2021.

by 2025-26, almost entire plane will be made with Chinese parts include engine as well.
 

sahureka

Junior Member
Registered Member
you know what, this picture is highly misleading.

if you have time please read last 50 or 70 pages of this thread.

C919 60 percent components/parts/subsystems have been localized as of 2021.

by 2025-26, almost entire plane will be made with Chinese parts include engine as well.
when it is, it will be a great victory for China, but until then the problems will persist, and it is the almost word that it could always be the sword of Damocles. Furthermore, with new engines or components of national production, the C-919 is to be considered a new version, for domestic flights no problem the Chinese institution will grant a new certification, but for flights to Europe, the EU and the USA, if I'm not mistaken, he will have to receive a new certification from their responsible bodies and it is at that moment that there could be misunderstandings, delays or denials in granting them.
 

gelgoog

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
but China must be very careful, the countries of the so-called West have the habit of imposing sanctions, even more when a nation becomes a competitor not only geopolitically but also precisely in the commercial aircraft production sector.
...
What would happen to the C919 or ARJ21 if as with the Russian SSJ-100 the suppliers of parts are forced to refuse to supply them? Therefore, a problem that would also arise for the C929, only a completely national production would avoid it.
China is doing something similar to what they did with the high speed train program. Most of those parts, with the exception of the engines, are being made in joint ventures in China with Western firms. And there is also a program to replace the engines with the native CJ-1000 engine. Eventually China will make its own subsystems. The fact is China could make its own subsystems if they wanted to. The Y-20 uses all Chinese components and the technological difficulty in the subsystems is roughly the same. It is just that they would not be certified for operations by EASA or the FAA and in the case of the engines they would be of an older generation.
 
Last edited:
Top