Sure right, you started with a vague and snide remark. Continued on with 2 pictures of a Javelin, and failed to remark that compared to 2 still pictures we actually have a full motion video of the new ATGM in action which is a much better evidence form and fail to follow it up with further clarification beyond "See my point?".
And I will repeat it as many times as you need to listen. If you fail to clarify your position on a subject and barge head on into any discussion, you do not get to say the other side misconstrue your point.
Not my fault you fail to clarify where you stand or that you dig deeper when I counter that for the HJ-12 we have evidence to the contrary and that possibility is not a valid contentment. And any normal person would interpret it in relation with the OP unless specifically clarified.It's not my problem that you have a reading comprehension problem. Have you not noticed that in my original reply, I only quoted a small part of your reply to Insignius and cut out the rest? See attached screenshot below (in red box). What does that tell you? How would a normal person interpret that? Let me give you a clue: I was only replying to the part in the red box.
Do I have to repeat nine times for you to understand this again? Where have I ever said that this new ATGM is or isn't a replacement for HJ-12? It's all in your head; you imagined the whole thing. Like I said, get yourself evaluated. Seriously, you need help.
And I will repeat the same to you that by inserting yourself into a argument and going along with it, you do not get to claim you were misunderstood.
Nope, even in the real world you don't just insert yourself into a discussion. Go of different tangent without clarification and then expect the benefit of being misunderstood.
