No, that is emphatically not what I said. That is what you think I said. Point to the post or posts where I made the assertion. I know you can't because you haven't been able to despite my repeated requests. At this point, I think it's safe to say that it's all in your paranoid head.
Seriously, how many times do I have to repeat myself? Let me summarize what I said thus far, if only you had cared to read and comprehend:
1) You were hasty in concluding that the new ATGM is designed for tripod (i.e. fixed position) and cannot be shoulder-fired like the Javelin. I said that because the footage we have is very limited. I think the possibility of the missile being shoulder-fired cannot be dismissed at this point because it's too early to say. We should
reserve judgement until more footage or evidence surfaces. In other words, I make
no assertion on whether this new missile is shoulder-fired or not. I simply do
not know, and I don't lean one way or the other.
2) Let me put this another way. The only assertion I made was that
you were hasty in reaching your original conclusion. In other words, I find your rush to conclusion objectionable. That's it, nothing more, nothing less.
3) Let me further simplify this: STOP rushing to definitive conclusions based on a few seconds of footage!
By the way, it's obvious that you don't understand what the word "argument" stands for in "
". It has a
in logic and philosophy. Read up on it before you use that word again in the context of this conversation because you are making absolutely no sense.
I NEVER said anything about HJ-12. What about it? I also never said you wet your bed or you have webbed toes. What's going on in your head? Where did I say anything anywhere about the HJ-12 in our conversation, and how is it even relevant here?