China's strategy in Korean peninsula

SamuraiBlue

SamuraiBlue

Captain
taxiya said:
Generally agreed with logics. But two comments though.

1.
I am sure "not need" is a certain thing because the existing treaty. Whoever is left in control is one of the existing members of the current government who can only survive with China's backing, forget about surrendering to SK or U.S. They will be throw in prison the minute they handover their weapon.

2. Because the left-in-controls are from the current government who must and surely will have Chinese backing, the "regime" will not collapse. Only Kim himself and his close allies in the leadership will be gone, cleansed, purged. The institution will stay because the majority of the ruling people will stay. It would be more akin to PRC's purge of the gang of four in 1976.
Click to expand...

Are you guys serious?
Basically you are talking about creating a puppet state through military action.
The League of Nations didn't accept that kind of action and UN will certainly not accept either.
If PRC starts moving military force into NK without warning or request by the NK government then SK will most certainly move theirs as well to race who reaches Pyongyang first.
 
SamuraiBlue

SamuraiBlue

Captain
Equation said:
Are you stating that ONLY the West and Japan has the right to make the rules and therefore everyone else's opinion or concern be damn?
Click to expand...

100 years ago by all means, but this is the present and I believe we have out grown from hegemonism.
Do you think any nation is going to tolerate that kind of atitude with the history that it drags along?
 
SamuraiBlue

SamuraiBlue

Captain
Equation said:
But Japan has NOT outgrown or admit to their waning status quo.
Click to expand...
When did Japan invade another region, created a dispute in a region and gone further by developing an artificial island after WW2?
In fact name one soul that Japan had take through military action after WW2, I dare you.
 
Equation

Equation

Lieutenant General
SamuraiBlue said:
When did Japan invade another region, created a dispute in a region and gone further by developing an artificial island after WW2?
In fact name one soul that Japan had take through military action after WW2, I dare you.
Click to expand...

So in that case why does Japan are so concern about the changing status quo? China is not going to invade them.
 
Equation

Equation

Lieutenant General
SamuraiBlue said:
Japan changing the status quo?
In which era and where are you referring about?
Click to expand...

In what One World order are you living in? Why is it Japan are so nervous about a rising China was my main argument until you messed it up the debate by throwing out nonsense for the sake of arguing.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top