They did not say anything about the stage really. At least, not for this launch (I'll highlight where they talk about a different launch).
Posting from their LinkedIn - why? - article.
China's Space Program Thread II
- Thread starter Blitzo
- Start date
They did not say anything about the stage really. At least, not for this launch (I'll highlight where they talk about a different launch).
Posting from their LinkedIn - why? - article.
Another US propaganda department's shell company headed by a former US military personel Tim Solms
Any such capability of tracking of small debris would need large space and ground assets that only a national agency has such as NORAD which is part of US military. It would sound more "credible" if such "information" is spread by "open source", "NGO" and "concerned citizens" instead of US military. This company only got "infor" from NORAD and acted as a mounth-piece. Doe NORAD actually have anything real? Is it going to get in a fight with China who will return in showing American's debrises? For me, these so-called "expert" and "scienctists" are on the same leve as CNN "reporters" having credibility deficits.
It is same game repeating all over again, and I am sure it will continue.
Any such capability of tracking of small debris would need large space and ground assets that only a national agency has such as NORAD which is part of US military. It would sound more "credible" if such "information" is spread by "open source", "NGO" and "concerned citizens" instead of US military. This company only got "infor" from NORAD and acted as a mounth-piece. Doe NORAD actually have anything real? Is it going to get in a fight with China who will return in showing American's debrises? For me, these so-called "expert" and "scienctists" are on the same leve as CNN "reporters" having credibility deficits.
It is same game repeating all over again, and I am sure it will continue.
Last edited:
escobar
Brigadier
It is most likely due to passivation but not necessarily an issue as in breakup or explosion.
If there is tens of tonnes fuel (kerosene in CZ-6A) to be ejected out of the tank, it will form many liquid blobs and soon frozen to solid. They won't disappear easily and will keep flying in their own orbits. One can call these debris if it suits their agenda, but this would be common for all kerosene or hypergolic 2nd stages.
If there is tens of tonnes fuel (kerosene in CZ-6A) to be ejected out of the tank, it will form many liquid blobs and soon frozen to solid. They won't disappear easily and will keep flying in their own orbits. One can call these debris if it suits their agenda, but this would be common for all kerosene or hypergolic 2nd stages.
antiterror13
Brigadier
Do they do the same for failed US rockets?
escobar
Brigadier
700 debris fragments in the very same orbit in which the sats were deployed
Last edited:
At this moment the 200t FFSC methane engine is ONE of the options of CZ-9 1st and 2nd stage engines. This means the many variants of CZ-9 in various ppts are parallel efforts as I have said before, instead of one design replacing another as some may have believed.