China's Space Program Thread II

taxiya

Brigadier
Registered Member
3.5m diameter is even wider than the DF-4. Given that solid propellant is a lot more dense than liquid fuel like the one used in the DF-4 this solid is totally overkill. Is this for a lunar rocket or what?

For reference the Shuttle Solid Rocket Booster has 3.7m diameter and the Ariane 5 P230 solids have 3m diameter.
It was meant for the LH/LO+SRB variant of CZ-9 in the early study. Even though that variant of CZ-9 is probably never developed, engine works will continue to fruition just like YF-130 and YF-90 as the saying "发展航天,动力先行"
1667330554274.png
 

by78

General
Two more images from yesterday's Mengtian module launch.

52471154118_d313ad6e64_k.jpg
52470887294_d586044c96_k.jpg
 

Helius

Senior Member
Registered Member
It was meant for the LH/LO+SRB variant of CZ-9 in the early study. Even though that variant of CZ-9 is probably never developed, engine works will continue to fruition just like YF-130 and YF-90 as the saying "发展航天,动力先行"
View attachment 100664
It looks to have made incredible progress already if it's indeed true they've managed 500t of thrust on 150t of solid fuel.

If I'm reading the graphic right that CZ-9 plan originally called for "4x 5-segment SRBs with approx. 1,000t thrust each", or 200t/f from each individual segment. That's basically 2 CZ-9 SRBs (2,000t/f) doing the job of 1 SSSRB (1,800t/f) on the SLS.

In the absence of info relating to how much fuel mass each of those CZ-9 SRBs was supposed to have, if we assume that each segment had the same mass as that test rig i.e. 150t, then the new rig has already more than doubled the output of that proposed CZ-9 SRB, going from 200t thrust to 500t.

While by no means a precise calculation, just for spitballing's sake, if they were to scale it up to a 5-segment external booster it could quite possibly mean a 750t heavy SRB with 2,500t of thrust... Pretty huge.

Even a 4-segment SRB that's capable of 2,000t thrust that can run on 600t of solid fuel would already be more efficient than the SLS SSSRB which requires 730t of solid fuel to produce 1,800t of thrust.
 
Last edited:

taxiya

Brigadier
Registered Member
It looks to have made incredible progress already if it's indeed true they've managed 500t of thrust on 150t of solid fuel.

If I'm reading the graphic right that CZ-9 plan originally called for "4x 5-segment SRBs with approx. 1,000t thrust each", or 200t/f from each individual segment. That's basically 2 CZ-9 SRBs (2,000t/f) doing the job of 1 SSSRB (1,800t/f) on the SLS.

In the absence of info relating to how much fuel mass each of those CZ-9 SRBs was supposed to have, if we assume that each segment had the same mass as that test rig i.e. 150t, then the new rig has already more than doubled the output of that proposed CZ-9 SRB, going from 200t thrust to 500t.

While by no means a precise calculation, just for spitballing's sake, if they were to scale it up to a 5-segment external booster it could quite possibly mean a 750t heavy SRB with 2,500t of thrust... Pretty huge.

Even a 4-segment SRB that's capable of 2,000t thrust that can run on 600t of solid fuel would already be more efficient than the SLS SSSRB which requires 730t of solid fuel to produce 1,800t of thrust.
You are thinking in the right direction, however due to my limited knowledge I will not go into details. But one thing is clear to me that the 500t engine is not only better than the spec in the old CZ-9 design but also better than SSSRB. The reason is simple, it is apparently powered by newer generation propellent, likely N-15 or N-15B, its American counterpart is NEPE-75 used in Trident 5D.
 
Last edited:

Temstar

Brigadier
Registered Member
I found a good comparison for that 500 ton thrust motor - Ariane 6's P120 motor which is also monolithic and carbon fibre casing:

P120:
Height 11.7m
Diameter 3.4m
Empty mass 11t
Gross mass 154.6t
Propellant mass 143.6t
Maximum thrust 4.65MN (474t)
Specific impulse 278.5s
Burn time 132.8s
Propellant Aluminium-HTPB 1912

For the CASC motor we know:
Diameter 3.5m
Maximum thrust 500t
Propellant mass 150t

So fairly comparable from the data we have, just a hair bigger. And given Ariane 6 is using P120 certainly this CASC motor certainly already has practical application.

If you see anyone try to argue that "most powerful monolithic SRB" is a meaningless achievement and segmented motor is all the rage well:
P80.JPG

P120.JPG
Tell them to take it up with ESA.
 

Helius

Senior Member
Registered Member
You are thinking in the right direction, however due to my limited knowledge I will not go into details. But one thing is clear to me that the 500t engine is not only better than the spec in the old CZ-9 design but also better than SSSRB. The reason is simple, it is apparently powered by newer generation propellent, likely N-15 or N-15B, its American counterpart is NEPE-75 used in Trident 5D.
The N15 isn't that new of a propellant. It's the same AP/HTPB-derived solid fuel that's used on DF-31 and thus CZ-11. It's newer than the NEPE, sure; and the CASC facility out of Jianghe that produces the propellant could've refined it further for better combustion kinetics, but I doubt fuel alone accounts for the marked increase in performance.

If that's the case then simply scaling up CZ-11's P35 motor from its 35t fuel mass/120t thrust config would've produced even greater thrust than this 150t model without even accounting for the weight savings from its carbon fibre hull (which is irrelevant anyway), and it certainly wouldn't have taken them until now (or rather last year to be specific) to manage to produce a 500t thrust SRM.
 

taxiya

Brigadier
Registered Member
The N15 isn't that new of a propellant. It's the same AP/HTPB-derived solid fuel that's used on DF-31 and thus CZ-11. It's newer than the NEPE
From an article dated 2007, it seems to me that CASC regards NEPE as one generation above HTPB and N-15 is on the same generation of NEPE. A then future ICBM would use HTPB for 1st stage while N-15 for 2nd stage, an underdeveloped new propellent for 3rd stage due to the higher cost and higher performance. So just as NEPE is chemically different from HTPB, I suppose so is N-15.

《二十一世纪航天科学技术发展与前景高峰论坛暨中国宇航学会第二届学术年会论文集》

中国宇航出版社 , 2007.11

(中国宇航学会第二届学术年会论于2006年11月在北京召开)
 

Helius

Senior Member
Registered Member
From an article dated 2007, it seems to me that CASC regards NEPE as one generation above HTPB and N-15 is on the same generation of NEPE. A then future ICBM would use HTPB for 1st stage while N-15 for 2nd stage, an underdeveloped new propellent for 3rd stage due to the higher cost and higher performance. So just as NEPE is chemically different from HTPB, I suppose so is N-15.

《二十一世纪航天科学技术发展与前景高峰论坛暨中国宇航学会第二届学术年会论文集》

中国宇航出版社 , 2007.11

(中国宇航学会第二届学术年会论于2006年11月在北京召开)
HTPB, NEPE, BAMO, PBAN and the likes are different chemical binding processes to the primary ammonium perchlorate (AP) solid fuel mixture. They have scantly anything to do with generational differences.

The N15 that CZ-11 uses is derived from DF-31's which is HTPB-based, which incidentally has a slightly higher specific impulse over the SSSRB, which is PBAN-based, which is newer and supposed to have higher performance than HTPB.

Then there's NEPE, which also goes by PEG/NG (Polythylene Glycol Nitroglycerine), which is even newer, but I don't know of any rockets that use that specific mix other than Trident II.
 

sunnymaxi

Major
Registered Member
Shenzhen 14 Astronaut Crew and ASEAN Youth Questions and Answers "Vietnamese Branch Event Held] On November 1, the "Tiangong Dialogue - Shenzhou 14 Astronaut Crew and ASEAN Youth Questions and Answers" Vietnam branch event was held in Hanoi, Vietnam. The junior high school of Long Middle School was held.

The students of Thang Long Middle School had an online interaction with the Shenzhou 14 astronaut crew on the spot, and the astronauts gave detailed answers to the questions raised by the Vietnamese middle school
00686eaKgy1h7qlxr0wphj30pw0jf7cz.jpg00686eaKgy1h7qlxrdn34j30ps0jck6p.jpg00686eaKgy1h7qlxrt1efj30q10jj17d.jpg
 

sunnymaxi

Major
Registered Member
More and More

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

In the event of "Talk with Taikonauts" via video link, Jeanel Dimayuga, a Philippine high schooler, had a chance to ask Chinese taikonauts working at China's Tiangong space station how they felt the time passing in outer space and the physical impact of a zero-gravity environment.

MANILA, Nov. 2 (Xinhua) -- Hundreds of students across Southeast Asian countries attended Tuesday a live class delivered from China's space station and talked with Chinese taikonauts via video link, which inspired them to pursue their space dream.

Although it was a holiday, scores of Philippine students from high schools gathered for a special session named "Talk With Taikonauts," a unique opportunity for young space enthusiasts from the 10-country bloc Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) to have first-hand knowledge about space science and outer space exploration.

Jeanel Dimayuga, a 12th grader from Makati High School, had a chance to ask China's Shenzhou-14 spaceship crew members Chen Dong, Liu Yang, and Cai Xuzhe how they felt the time passing in outer space and the impact of the zero-gravity environment on their bodies.
202211023d48fca6b56f4acdaa83371abe08fc4f_d376955a-9596-4797-8ccc-53b642211ba3.jpg

Students in Taguig city, the Philippines, participate in the "Talk with Taikonauts" event to interact with Chinese taikonauts working at China's Tiangong space station via video link, Nov. 1, 2022

The trio of taikonauts answered various questions from the students and shared with the Asian youth their life and scientific work in the space station since early June when the Shenzhou-14 spaceship was successfully launched.

One day earlier, China launched the 17.88-meter-long space lab module Mengtian, bringing the construction of the space station Tiangong into the final stage. The building of Tiangong into a national space laboratory with three modules marks a milestone in China's three-decade effort to advance its manned space program.

Richard Shao from Philippine Cultural College said China having made such achievements in space technologies has inspired him to continue exploring the mysteries of the universe.

During the live lecture, Philippine First Lady Louise Araneta-Marcos said the dialogue with Chinese taikonauts provided "an opportunity for our younger generation to learn more about space engineering."

"We hope this exchange will further stimulate the curiosity of our Philippine youth regarding space and the bigger frontier out there," she added.

Philippine Space Agency deputy director general Gay Jane Perez hailed China's advancement in space and highlighted China's contribution to sharing and promoting space technologies.

"Young minds are curious and imaginative, and the space offers limitless possibility of pushing the boundary of knowledge, exploring the unknown and creating new technologies and innovations," Perez said.

She said China has created opportunities for cooperation in the ASEAN region. The space lecture would be an "inspiration to our students to pursue their dreams, to explore the vastness of the space."

202211023d48fca6b56f4acdaa83371abe08fc4f_b8af22d4-1661-4f64-a10d-258d7d4682fc.jpg

Students in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, participate in the "Talk with Taikonauts" event to interact with Chinese taikonauts working at China's Tiangong space station via video link, Nov. 1, 202

Chinese Ambassador to the Philippines Huang Xilian said outer space is the "common wealth of humanity" and should be explored, developed, and utilized peacefully.

"China advocates for joint efforts with nations around the world to build a community with a shared future for humanity and to enhance international exchange and cooperation in outer space on the basis of equality, mutual benefit, peaceful use, and inclusive development," the Chinese envoy said.

He added that China is willing to share the achievements of aerospace development with the Philippines in various forms and discuss strengthening exchanges and cooperation in the field of aerospace science and technology for the power of science and technology to benefit the people of both countries.
 
Top