Not only capable, but actually one of many CZ-7's variants was intended to replace CZ-2F, so the design margine is man rated. The also explains partially why CZ-7 isn't so good in payload ratio. CZ-7's LEO 15t was set for that purpose. The larger size of the new generation capsule wasn't the reason to switch to CZ-10A whose reusable LEO capacity is 14t within the 15t parameter. I think the reason is to maintain only one rocket family instead of two to reduce cost.On paper the Long March 7 has the same performance as the Long March 2F. It could easily replace that rocket to launch Shenzhou.
The larger next generation space capsule will be launched with Long March 10.
Last edited: