You have three meals everyday as a routine just like everybody else, that is your plan. However if I eat cooked meat, you must eat raw meat, otherwise you are following every move of mine?
October 24, 2020
The Starship program is unique and one of the most ambitious in the history of rocketry. The design has now gone through at least twelve known versions and four different names!
Its first version was a single or triple-core rocket back in 2013, which has evolved into the single-core stainless steel Starship design under construction today. Even as the design’s size has fluctuated dramatically, its repertoire of missions and roles has expanded.
It started out as a rocket meant to colonize Mars but now is envisioned as an all-purpose carrier rocket to replace the Falcon 9 rocket family. It is expected to launch satellites into Earth orbit, fly people point-to-point on Earth, ferry cargo and [robotic] crew to and from the Moon, in addition to its original role as a Mars colonization vehicle.
The vehicle’s push towards flight has made rapid progress since the decision to ditch an all-carbon-fiber design in 2018.
The combination of stainless steel construction, A/B prototyping, and iterative testing are allowing an accelerated development timeline.
▲ Some of the 12 design versions of Starship. 2020
Note the uncanny resemblance between the 2022 CZ-9 and the SpaceX Starship Version 6, and also between the 2023 CZ-9-Xingjian and the SpaceX Starship Version 11.
Version 5 (Mars Colonial Transporter-October 2015)
In January 2015, SpaceX reversed course and suddenly revised the Raptor engine’s thrust down to 2,256 kN (507,100 lbf), though no mention was made of changes in the rocket’s overall thrust or design, other than there would be a lot of engines.
One of SpaceX’s initial hand-drawn sketches of the upper stage was of a simple 15 meter wide capsule rimmed with 15 Raptor engines, each sporting a 2.89 m (9.5 ft.) nozzle. The cargo and crew would sit beneath the propellant tanks. A spherical liquid oxygen tank 13 meters in diameter would sit in the nose, with the liquid methane tank beneath it. It would enter a planet’s atmosphere on its side, as would all of its successors. This was because side-on entry has good entry, descent, and landing (EDL) performance, while capsule entry made protecting the engines from re-entry heating very challenging.
▲ 5th versions of Starship. 2020
Note the SpaceX Starship Version 5 with a 15 meter wide capsule rimmed with 15 Raptor engines, each sporting a 2.89 m nozzle.
This is what the Stoke upper stage could look like in the future with a total thrust of 15 x 2,256 kN or 33'840 kN.
I dunno about Stoke Space's concept of many tiny rockets. Generally, many tiny rockets also means you have many points of failure. Also their claim of "rapid reuse" is complete BS. Despite SpaceX's Falcon 9 giving the impression of being rapidly reusable, their rockets typically need to undergo many many months of reconditioning as the engines and avionics are meticulously checked to ensure safety and reliability. You can just refuel your rocket and yeet it into space immediately.
Also the efficiency of their second stage must be shit given that they decided to go with many smaller exhaust nozzles.
Not tiny rockets, that's only for the first demonstrator (or proof of concept), like the Grasshopper SLV was to the Falcon-9!
Since the stated goal is to put 150 to 300 tonnes payload into LEO, we should expect the real Stoke upper stage to be fitted with 30 hydrolox engines of ~100 ton-force each totalling 33'840 kN!
And with record efficiency since hydrolox 462s Isp is far better than kerolox or methalox engine.
The first stage does not need to go to Mars or the Moon. And that is where you will use LOX/Kerosene. Using the same base engine on both stages, like done in Falcon 9, is a way to cut on development and manufacturing costs. Since SpaceX decided to use multiple Raptor engine sizes on Starship that became moot.
Methalox has a big advantage over kerolox that wasn’t appreciated back in the 1960s: less coking. Engines walls are made of thousands of tiny tubes carrying propellant, which cools those walls below their melting point. Engines cooled by kerosene suffer from carbon deposits on the inside of those tubes, which reduces the cooling rate at the deposit site and can lead to burn-through.
SpaceX started a revolution in the 2000s by pursuing the reuse of their first stage engines. They are successfully reusing their kerolox Merlin engines. To achieve that, however, they have to get those engines to survive longer total run times that previous kerolox engines. I’m fairly sure that an essential part of their success here is cleaning the coolant passages around the combustion chamber (and especially the throat) of accumulated coke. SpaceX is working hard to reduce the cost of reusing their engines, this cleaning is time consuming and can’t be done on Mars, and so they’ve made the hard choice to develop another engine, which uses methalox propellant to reduce coking, rather than continue development of the best-in-the-world kerolox engine that has arguably been the single most important factor in getting them into their world-leading position today.
So why all the methalox engine development recently? Because SpaceX is fed up with cleaning their Merlins, and everyone else is terrified of being left even farther behind in their dust.
Have you ever come across any Chinese official statement that said they want to be ahead of US in their space missions, so as to win a race? Space race is a Cold War mentality, not a path taken by China.
As there was an arms race between the U.S. and the U.S.S.R. for the nuclear supremacy, today there is a space race for Proliferated Low Earth Orbit (pLEO) mega constellations.
I will explain all in detail in a dedicated thread what the current space race between China and the U.S. is about.
I will post my findings but there is no place in this thread, as it will take over 20 to 40 replies.
It took me over 5 hours recently in a Chinese Taipei English language forum to post only the first part, and the only risk is censorship, as recently happened.