This is incorrect, it has a lot of choices. All modern upper stages have the ability to alter their orbit as part of the pacification process post-separation. The problem
with this specific variant is that it has no upper stage, the core/sustainer itself is what holds the PAF and the payload itself.
It was known for quite a time that not adding an RCS component would result in having a mass of more than 20 tons tumbling in orbit post-separation.
Which frankly, in 2021 is both avoidable and unacceptable. Thus, it had been suspected that measures were made to allow for de-orbiting the stage via upgrading the stage batteries and timing the pacification process (opening the bi-valves to remove residual propellant) so as to control the re-entry point. There were subtle clues coming from CALT on this.
Something went wrong on this one or the changes simply did not go through.
In any case, the result is highly regrettable. It is impossible to argue otherwise, unless you either don't care about spaceflight or don't care about China's Space Program.
edit: