China's Space Program News Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

Temstar

Brigadier
Registered Member
What is the plan for the backup Tianhe core module now? does anyone have a graphic showing what the CSS could look like in Maxed Out configuration?
LKwkVPE.gif

Ef4GiFHX0AI7J1y.jpg
With a full set of six modules it would be nearly half the mass of ISS.
 

takwb

New Member
Registered Member
LKwkVPE.gif

View attachment 71531
With a full set of six modules it would be nearly half the mass of ISS.

I suppose weight by itself wouldn't be the perfect measure of capability. After all, a cassette player is multiple times heavier than a MP3 player which is arguably infinitely heavier than the software running on a smartphone. lol.

I wonder if there is a comparison of all the functionalities against the ISS.
 

KampfAlwin

Junior Member
Registered Member
I suppose weight by itself wouldn't be the perfect measure of capability. After all, a cassette player is multiple times heavier than a MP3 player which is arguably infinitely heavier than the software running on a smartphone. lol.

I wonder if there is a comparison of all the functionalities against the ISS.
Sorry if I am mistaken, but doesn't your explanation contradict your statement? You explained a cassette player is inferior to an MP3 player by capability as well as weighing more. Maybe you meant something else? The Tianhe should superior to each ISS core module compared seperately IMO because it was made in 2010s while most of the ISS modules was made late 1990s
 

voyager1

Captain
Registered Member
I suppose weight by itself wouldn't be the perfect measure of capability. After all, a cassette player is multiple times heavier than a MP3 player which is arguably infinitely heavier than the software running on a smartphone. lol.

I wonder if there is a comparison of all the functionalities against the ISS.
I think a good comparison metric is the inside useful volume capacity.

How much bigger is the internal useful voulme of ISS over this station?
 

Temstar

Brigadier
Registered Member
I think a good comparison metric is the inside useful volume capacity.

How much bigger is the internal useful voulme of ISS over this station?
Pressurised volume:
ISS - 915.6 m^3
CSS - 110 m^3

That's not including the expansion plan, if CSS gets the full 6 modules you would expect that volume to be about double.

Another good metric is power. I don't know how much power generation capacity CSS will have when finished bit I heard it's a lot. ISS is 84-120 kW average power (240kW in direct sunlight)
 

voyager1

Captain
Registered Member
Is it possible to change space station inclination while already in orbit?
No way Russia would seriously demand an orbit change with the station already launched.

They probably asked for a change before the launch but China for its own reasons declined to do so

I dont think that the station itself can change its orbit a lot.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top