China's SCS Strategy Thread

tidalwave

Senior Member
Registered Member
Ok, finally sailed within the 12miles.

I think its good. China , by nature, is passively reactive.
Only after being pushed and threatened, they will act otherwise sit there and do nothing.
 

N00813

Junior Member
Registered Member
Agreed. It was all fun and games and international waters when they were outside the 12 miles, but now...

Now China has the perfect reason to load the Paracels up to the gills with gear.
 

Yvrch

Junior Member
Registered Member
This is what VoA said - 'within 22 kilometers (13.7 miles)'. Obviously they were trying to keep the powder dry at the same time.

The U.S. Defense Department said it sent a guided missile destroyer, the USS William Lawrence, to within 22 kilometers (13.7 miles) of Fiery Cross Reef, a land feature in the South China Sea.


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

News / Asia

US, China Engage in New South China Sea Face-off
Print
Comment
Share:
Fiery Cross Reef, in the South China Sea
Fiery Cross Reef, in the South China Sea

Pin It
RELATED ARTICLES

China Hopes for Progress with New Philippine Government
US Warship Makes ‘Freedom of Navigation' Tour in S. China Sea
Beijing Warns Critics Over South China Sea Dispute
VOA News
May 10, 2016 6:08 PM

The U.S. and China engaged in a new face-off Tuesday in the South China Sea, with an American warship sailing near disputed artificial islands claimed by Beijing, and China scrambling fighter jets to warn off the U.S. vessel.

The U.S. Defense Department said it sent a guided missile destroyer, the USS William Lawrence, to within 22 kilometers (13.7 miles) of Fiery Cross Reef, a land feature in the South China Sea.

In response, China said it dispatched two fighter jets and three vessels to monitor the U.S. ship's passage and warned it to leave the waters near the reef.

Fiery Cross is composed of about 280 hectares (690 acres) of mostly dredged material from the ocean floor, to which China and other nations lay claim. Beijing in the last several years has built a 3,000-meter runway there, opened a port and erected other military facilities.

FILE - The USS William P. Lawrence guided missile destroyer, below, awaits refueling from a tanker, above, off Coronado, Calif., Jan. 20, 2016.
FILE - The USS William P. Lawrence guided missile destroyer, below, awaits refueling from a tanker, above, off Coronado, Calif., Jan. 20, 2016.
In less than a year, the U.S. has conducted three so-called freedom-of-navigation operations in the South China Sea to contest what it believes to be excessive claims to the territory by nearby countries.

The Lawrence operation was meant to "challenge excessive maritime claims of some claimants in the South China Sea," Defense Department spokesman Bill Urban said in an emailed statement. "These excessive maritime claims are inconsistent with international law as reflected in the Law of the Sea Convention in that they purport to restrict the navigation rights that the United States and all states are entitled to exercise."

State Department spokeswoman Elizabeth Trudeau stressed later that the operation challenged attempts by China, Taiwan and Vietnam to restrict navigational rights around the feature they claim. The operation is not singling out China, she said.

The Chinese foreign and defense ministries described the U.S. ship's maneuver as provocative and said the American operation was justification for Beijing's construction of military facilities on the island.

Although the United States is not a claimant to the sovereignty over disputed islands in the South China Sea, senior officials have been saying it is vital to U.S. interests that various claimants pursue their claims peacefully and in accordance with international laws.

About $5 trillion in ship-borne trade passes every year through the South China Sea, the majority of which China claims. The Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia, Taiwan and Brunei also have claims to parts of the sea.
 

Yvrch

Junior Member
Registered Member
Ok, finally sailed within the 12miles.

I think its good. China , by nature, is passively reactive.
Only after being pushed and threatened, they will act otherwise sit there and do nothing.

It's barely within 12 nautical miles, 13.7 miles would give us 11.90497 nautical miles.
If she was cruising at 20, it's less than 3 seconds to cover that small distance, wind and wave can drift her more than that in an hour.

This FONOP is actually a joke. It's more like a navigation game of chicken to provoke China.
 

Yvrch

Junior Member
Registered Member
"USS William P. Lawrence exercised the right of innocent passage while transiting inside 12 nautical miles of Fiery Cross Reef, a high-tide feature that is occupied by China, but also claimed by the Philippines, Taiwan, and Vietnam," a Pentagon statement said.

So it is an innocent passage after all. They got out after China shooed them away. Does that mean they acquiesced and tacitly accept China sovereignty over the 12 miles? It does seem to be so.



Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


U.S. destroyer sails near disputed Chinese island

By Brad Lendon and Jim Sciutto, CNN

Updated 6:18 PM ET, Tue May 10, 2016


U.S. warship was exercising right of "innocent passage," the Pentagon says
Three Chinese planes and three Chinese ships were dispatched to the area
China says the U.S. move justifies Beijing building military facilities on disputed islands

(CNN)The U.S. Navy on Tuesday sent a guided missile destroyer within 12 miles of a disputed island in the South China Sea where China has built an airstrip -- prompting China to scramble fighter jets and dispatch warships to "expel" the American ship.
"USS William P. Lawrence exercised the right of innocent passage while transiting inside 12 nautical miles of Fiery Cross Reef, a high-tide feature that is occupied by China, but also claimed by the Philippines, Taiwan, and Vietnam," a Pentagon statement said.

"This operation challenged attempts by China, Taiwan, and Vietnam to restrict navigation rights around the features they claim ... contrary to international law," the statement continued.
Under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, 12 nautical miles is considered the limit at which a nation's rule extends off its shores.
The Law of the Sea defines "innocent passage" as a transit in which a ship does not conduct any military, commercial or research activities.
The Pentagon statement said the U.S. did not notify any of the countries involved about the destroyer's transit in advance.
The guided missile destroyer USS William P. Lawrence transits the Philippine Sea earlier this year.
The guided missile destroyer USS William P. Lawrence transits the Philippine Sea earlier this year.
Chinese vessels challenged the Lawrence a dozen times by radio, a U.S. official said, but the Chinese ships did not come as close to the U.S. ship as they had during previous times the U.S. sent ships through waters near disputed islands, including Fiery Cross Reef, which is in the Spratly Islands.
"This operation demonstrates, as President Obama has stated, that the United States will fly, sail, and operate wherever international law allows. That is true in the South China Sea as in other places around the globe," the Pentagon statement said.
The Chinese Defense Ministry reacted defiantly.
"The unauthorized entry by the U.S. warship into waters near China's Nansha Islands (which China calls the Spratlys) was an act of serious provocation," Senior Col. Yang Yujun, spokesman for China's Defense Ministry, said in a statement.
China dispatched two J-11 fighter jets, a Y-8 warning aircraft and three warships, a guided missile destroyer, a guided missile frigate and a frigate, to the area, Yang said.
They "promptly identified the U.S. warship and issued warnings to expel it from the area," Yang said.
A Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman also criticized the U.S. Navy's move.
"The relevant Chinese department took measures of monitoring, tracking and warning in accordance with the law. I have to point out, this action by the U.S. side threatened China's sovereignty and security interests, endangered the staff and facilities on the reef, and damaged regional peace and stability," spokesman Lu Kang said.
The South China Sea is the subject of several rival -- and often messy -- territorial claims, with China, Brunei, Malaysia, the Philippines, Taiwan and Vietnam disputing the sovereignty of several island chains and nearby waters.
Fiery Cross Reef is part of the disputed Spratly Islands. In January, China said it had completed building a runway on the island, one of three it has been constructing in the South China Sea with dredged material.
 
according to USNI News Beijing Vows to Increase South China Sea Defenses, Calls U.S. ‘Greatest Threat’ in Region
Chinese officials took a rhetorical hard line this week calling U.S. military actions in the South China Sea the “greatest threat” to stability in the region and vowed to increase its own military presence in the region, according to a Wednesday statement from the Chinese military.

“China will intensify sea and air patrol and enhance construction of defense capabilities in the area as needed, firmly safeguard national sovereignty and security and resolutely maintain peace and stability in the South China Sea,”
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.

The statement follows a Tuesday U.S. freedom of navigation operation in which a U.S. destroyer sailed within 12 nautical miles of a Chinese controlled installation in the Spratly Island chain.

USS William P. Lawrence (DDG-110) conducted an innocent passage past Fiery Cross Reef, a Chinese-controlled artificial island — also claimed by Taiwan, the Philippines and Vietnam, according to the Pentagon.

In immediate response to the transit, China launched two Shenyang J-11 fighters and a Shaanxi Y-8 AWACS, according to a Wednesday release from the Chinese Ministry of Defence. Additionally, a guided missile destroyer and two frigates tracked Lawrence during its transit past Fiery Cross reef.

The FON op prompted both the Ministries of Foreign Affairs and Defence to issue tough statements condemning the transit that also hinted at an expanded presence for the People’s Liberation Army in the region.

“We oppose such move by the US side and will continue to take necessary measures to protect China’s sovereignty and security,” Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Lu Kang said late Tuesday.
“The U.S. places its own interests above international law. The U.S. has been waving the banner of navigation and overflight freedom and flexing its muscles in the South China Sea by ordering its military vessels and planes to sail or fly close to or even enter waters and air space near relevant islands and reefs of China’s Nansha Islands… To peace and stability as well as navigation and overflight freedom in the South China Sea, such provocative act is the greatest threat.”

A People’s Liberation Army spokesman called the transit, “a serious provocation.”

“We cannot help but ask how far the U.S. tries to go on the way of pushing forward militarization of the South China Sea and undermining the peace and stability in that region,” People’s Liberation Army spokesman Senior Col. Yang Yujun said in a Wednesday statement.
“The unauthorized illegal entry into Chinese waters near China’s Nansha (Spratly) islands by the U.S. warships and warplanes is a serious provocation.”

While China has long had a rotating military presence on its holdings in the Paracel Islands off of Vietnam the newer installations in the Spratlys – born from an accelerated land reclamation campaign over the last two years – don’t have a standing PLA presence.

However, Fiery Cross reef features a 10,000-foot runway capable of handling almost all of China’s military aircraft that could easily be based at the facility.
In January, China landed two commercial passenger aircraft on the landing strip.

Additionally, the installations on Fiery Cross, Subi Reef and Mischief Reef in the Spratlys can act as logistics hubs for PLA Navy and China Coast Guard ships – further extending their range without additional logistics ships.

U.S. officials have said during war the military utility of the installations in the Spratlys would be negligible but during peacetime the presence of Chinese forces could be a coercive influence to nearby neighbors.

China has presented its role in the region as one of stabilization not provocation.

“For a long time, the freedom of navigation and overflight in the region has been upheld thanks to the cooperative and concerted efforts by China and relevant coastal countries in the South China Sea,” Lu said.
“In fact, the freedom of navigation and overflight and the passage of vessels of all countries have never met any obstacle.”

However, sporadic reports from
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
from China Coast Guard cutters toward fishing vessels.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, a Chinese cutter entered Indonesian territorial waters and rammed a Chinese fishing boat detained by Indonesian law enforcement. Other reports from Malaysia indicate Chinese cutters have escorted fishing ships into Malaysian territorial waters.

The following is a partial transcript of a May 10, 2016 press conference with Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Lu Kang.

Q: The US today staged a freedom of navigation operation (FONOP)by sending a navy vessel to waters off China’s Yongshu Jiao. What is your comment?

A: On May 10, without permission from the Chinese government, the USS William P. Lawrence destroyer illegally entered waters near the relevant reef of China’s Nansha Islands. Relevant department on the Chinese side monitored, followed and issued warnings to the US vessel in accordance with law. I must say that what the US warship has done threatened China’s sovereignty and security interests, endangered safety of personnel and facilities on the reef, and jeopardized regional peace and stability. Again, we oppose such move by the US side and will continue to take necessary measures to protect China’s sovereignty and security.

I also want to add that China has indisputable sovereignty over the Nansha Islands and the adjacent waters. For a long time, the freedom of navigation and overflight in the region has been upheld thanks to the cooperative and concerted efforts by China and relevant coastal countries in the South China Sea. In fact, the freedom of navigation and overflight and the passage of vessels of all countries have never met any obstacle.

The US rushed to put forward the so-call FONOP before the signing of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) in 1979. The US is challenging and provoking the new maritime order by wielding its military power. Many countries voiced their strong opposition to that from the very start. To this day, the US still drags its feet in joining UNCLOS. It is because the US places its own interests above international law. The US has been waving the banner of navigation and overflight freedom and flexing its muscles in the South China Sea by ordering its military vessels and planes to sail or fly close to or even enter waters and air space near relevant islands and reefs of China’s Nansha Islands. To peace and stability as well as navigation and overflight freedom in the South China Sea, such provocative act is the greatest threat.
source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Top