China's Defense/Military Breaking News Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

escobar

Brigadier
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!



  In early February of 2012, submarines of a submarine flotilla of the North China Sea Fleet under the Navy of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) braved snow and directly sailed to unknown sea area from the naval port for intensive confrontation drill.

  It is reported that this year the flotilla will focus on accelerating the transformation of combat power generating mode and innovating training patterns so as to speed up its combat power generation.

  To this end, on the basis of previous professional competitions and operational method training such as navigation and torpedo attack, the flotilla intentionally coordinated surface warship troop units to launch attacking-defending confrontation in this drill. In order to test and uplift the troops’ combat power, they set up such emergency scenarios as electronic interference, air raid by anti-submarine aircraft and breakage of submarines, in a bid to increase the confrontation difficulty and temper the emergency-handling capability of commanders and operators.

  Meanwhile, the participating submarines conducted submarine-anti-submarine confrontation exercise as adversaries.
 

escobar

Brigadier
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Vice-President Xi Jinping called for an expansion of military ties with the United States amid tension over Washington building up its military presence in the Asia-Pacific region.

During discussions on Tuesday with US officials, Xi also urged Washington to abandon trade protectionism and respect China's fundamental interests.

Meeting US Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and General Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Xi said military ties are an important part of the relationship.

Xi urged defense officials from the two countries to enhance dialogue, cultivate trust and accommodate major concerns to establish a mature military relationship.

Military ties between China and the US can suffer turbulence, especially when the US insists on arms sale to Taiwan.

US efforts to enhance its military presence in the Asia-Pacific, as well as frequently holding military drills with its allies, has added to tension between the two countries.

During Tuesday's meeting, US military officials said they want to enhance ties with China.

"The US and China are Pacific powers ... we want to work with China to build an open, transparent and inclusive regional security order," Panetta said.
Pentagon press secretary George Little, quoted by the Wall Street Journal, said the two countries shared a "wide-ranging discussion" on military and security matters.

Little said Xi supported an exchange of visits between Panetta and the defense minister and added that Panetta highlighted areas for potential military cooperation between Beijing and Washington, such as humanitarian aid and combating piracy.

"Both agreed that the two militaries should discuss the specifics of a program of future exchanges," he said.

Experts said military ties, as a barometer of Sino-US relations, deserve more attention.

Despite US complaints, "the transparency of the Chinese military has been improving through the years", said Shen Yi, a researcher of international studies from Fudan University in Shanghai.

But it will take time for the two countries to totally understand each other, Shen added.

Shi Yinhong, an expert on international studies with Renmin University of China in Beijing, said positive remarks by US military officials might not be translated into concrete action.

"Panetta's words are positive, but we must notice the difference in what the US says and what it really does," Shi said.

During his meeting with US President Barack Obama, Xi warned the US against protectionist measures, Xinhua News Agency reported.

Trade friction between China and the US should be resolved through dialogue, not protectionism, Xi said.

Obama said the US welcomes the peaceful rise of China.

"I have always emphasized that we welcome China's peaceful rise, that we believe that a strong and prosperous China is one that can help bring stability and prosperity to the region and to the world," Obama said.

But the US president urged China to play by what he called internationally accepted rules on trade.

"We want to work with China to make sure that everybody is following the same rules of the road when it comes to the world economic system, and that includes ensuring that there is a balanced trade flow between not only the US and China, but around the world," Obama said.

Chinese officials and experts earlier said the trade imbalance between the two countries is shrinking.

Although China enjoyed a trade surplus against the US last year, US exports to China outgrew its imports, highlighting the Asian powerhouse's crucial role as an increasingly important market for US goods and services.

US exports to China reached $122.2 billion in 2011, up about 20 percent from the previous year.

'Core interest'

During his meetings with Obama and US Vice-President Joe Biden, Xi stressed China's fundamental interests.

Xi urged Washington to conform to the spirit of the three joint communiques underpinning China-US relations during his meeting with Obama.

The Obama administration in September notified the US Congress of its decision to sell arms worth about $6 billion to Taiwan, including upgrades for 145 of Taiwan's fighter jets.

Though not speaking specifically about the arms sale, Xi called on the US to take concrete action to safeguard the peaceful development of relations across the Taiwan Straits.

Xi said the Taiwan question concerns China's sovereignty and territorial integrity, and remains, as always, the most important and most sensitive issue in China-US relations.
 

asif iqbal

Lieutenant General
It's a no-brainer that the Pakistanis would give China anything. I have seen a chart a month ago, of rankings of all the major countries' (general societal and governmental) negative attitudes towards China. The obvious is that Japan and Australia ranked top, but what's funny is that the Chinese themselves only ranked second last, meaning there's a country that like them more than themselves do, that is Pakistan.

i dont know about the survey but Sino-Pak friendship goes back a very long time, the people from the region have been trading with each other for centurys going back to the silk route

however it really started in 1965, after the war with India Pakistan was put under US embargos, operating F104 and F86 Sabre Pakistan was fully relient on US for its arms, under sanctions the F86s and F104 were hard to keep in the air due to lack of spares and it was then that China gifted Pakistan a F6 fighter jet

it was basic but was the best China could do at the time, Pakistan never forget its help from neighbour in time of need

then Pakistan played a crucial role in setting up Nixons visit to China in 1972

just like China made railways in Africa during 1970s at a time when China itself was a poor country, then Africa supported China in world stage

good deeds dont go to waste, today Sino-Pak are making JF17 like candy, thats how far we have come
 
Last edited:

escobar

Brigadier
PLA Navy opens first training class for escort mission
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


To further promote the smooth implementation of escort missions in the Gulf of Aden and waters off Somali coast, the Navy of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) started the first training class for the escort mission at the Naval Command College (NCC) on Feb. 13, 2012.

  This training class will last for 14 days. 84 persons from the leading organs of the PLA Navy, the 12th and 13th naval escort taskforces, the North China Sea Fleet and the NCC attend the training class.

   The training class will exert effort to improve the capability of the naval commanders at all levels, the frontline commanders in particular, in executing the oceangoing diversified military tasks by ways of theory lecture, experience exchange in groups, concentrated study and discussion as well as commanding drill.
 

escobar

Brigadier
First training class for joint-operation staff officers launched at NUDT
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


The first forward cultivation and training class for joint-operation staff officers of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) opened on February 14, 2012 at the National University of Defense Technology (NUDT). The trainees are 80 commanders at regiment and battalion levels selected from the army, navy, air force and the Second Artillery Force under the Guangzhou Theater of the PLA. It is an important measure for deepening and expanding the commanding talent training for joint operation.

  It is learned that the forward cultivation of joint-operation staff officers will be carried out for different theaters twice a year, each term lasting for one year. An integrated cultivation mode will be adopted which combines training at colleges and universities with practice in multiple services and arms.

   During the first phase, staff officers will be trained at colleges and universities. At first, they are required to complete the course of information knowledge at the NUDT, then learn the knowledge of services and arms at command colleges of multiple services and arms, and finally go to the National Defense University (NDU) for the training of joint operation command.

  During the second phase, probationary practice will be arranged in multiple services and arms. The trainees will be sent to the operation and training departments of the leading organs of combat troop units at division and brigade levels and above of multiple services and arms to have practice, so as to enhance their capability of joint operation planning and preparation.

  Wei Liang, assistant to director of the General Political Department (GPD) of the PLA, attended the opening ceremony and delivered a mobilization speech. Yang Xuejun, president of the NUDT, Wang Jianwei, political commissar of the NUDT, and leaders from relevant departments of the General Staff Headquarters (GSH) and GPD of the PLA were present at the opening ceremony.
 

escobar

Brigadier
Beijing MAC tempers troops’ systematic combat commanding and controlling capacity in cold region
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


In early February, 2012, several brigades and regiments under the Beijing Military Area Command (MAC) of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) marched into a large training base beyond the Great Wall to test the combat effectiveness of over 10 types of new commanding and controlling equipment in 3 categories at the temperature of -30℃ for the first time, in a bid to temper the all-weather systematic combat commanding and controlling capacity of command-and-staff organs based on the information system.

  As military training in the new year 2012 unfolded, the Beijing MAC decided to test the tactical and technical effectiveness of the new commanding and controlling equipment dominated by the integrated commanding platform in rugged environment in combination with the actual-troop and real-equipment drills.

  During the drill, with a focus on realizing various commanding organs’ information acquisition, transmission, processing and command and control under extremely cold conditions, all participating brigades and regiments conducted pre-order, enemy situation setting, random directing and quantitative evaluation on the new commanding and controlling equipment such as the integrated command platform and the field local area network (LAN), through which hundreds of sets of combat statistics have been accumulated and existing problems of over 20 trainings in five aspects have been spotted.

  Wei Wenhao, head of the Military Training and Arms Department under the Headquarters of the Beijing MAC, said that the participating troops analyzed the problems existing in the drills through video playback and sand-table deduction, deliberated counter-solutions and accordingly adjusted the training plans.
 

escobar

Brigadier
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


F201202170820301486531823.jpg

A soldier is conducting live-ammunition firing. Recently, a base under the Navy of the
Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) organized its naval vessels, special operation troops,
observation and communication unit and island-garrison force to conduct joint training in
the depth of sea, so as to temper the coordinating ability of each arm of the service and
enhance the training level.


F201202170820302370813463.jpg

The naval troops are conducting marine-air three-dimensional attack and defense. Recently,
a base under the Navy of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) organized its naval vessels,
special operation troops, observation and communication unit and island-garrison force to conduct
joint training in the depth of sea, so as to temper the coordinating ability of each arm of the service
and enhance the training level.
 

escobar

Brigadier
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


China will not engage in an arms race with other countries, Defense Ministry spokesman Geng Yansheng said on Wednesday, stressing that China's military growth is for defensive purposes.

The remarks were made in response to a recent report from IHS Jane's, a global think tank specializing in security issues, which claimed China's defense budget would double by 2015.

Geng questioned the sources of the figures in the report, and said China's defense budget is set in accordance with national security needs and the nation's economic growth level.

"The development of our military capabilities will not exceed our national security needs or economic capacity, and we will not engage in an arms race with other countries," Geng said at the ministry's monthly news conference.

This report is only one of a number published recently that have played up the "China threat".

Earlier this month, Japan's National Institute for Defense Studies released the China Security Report 2011, which said China is strengthening its military power to be able to stand up to the United States in regional resource development, according to the Global Times.

The report predicted that the South China Sea would be a major focus for China, and that the nation would strengthen its military power to ensure the safety of trade routes and its ability to counterbalance the US military, according to the newspaper.

Geng said the report was "making a wild guess" on China's military development and "playing up China's military threats", which "does no good for the development of Sino-Japanese relations or regional peace and stability".

Geng pointed out that Japan's military buildup in recent years has drawn much attention from the international community, especially neighboring countries.

"We hope Japan can draw lessons from history, keep its promise on peaceful development, increase transparency in military development and reflect on its own military policies, instead of pointing figures at others," Geng said.

China's military budget for 2011 rose 12.7 percent to $91.5 billion, accounting for only 1.5 percent of the nation's gross domestic product, in comparison with 4.8 percent in the US and 2.7 percent in the United Kingdom, according to the Xinhua News Agency.

From 1979 to 1989, China's military spending experienced an average annual decline of 5.83 percent, and the proportion of China's military budget in the country's total fiscal budget dropped from 8.66 percent in 1998 to 6.94 percent in 2009, Xinhua reported.

Zhai Dequan, deputy secretary-general of the China Arms Control and Disarmament Association, said: "China's military spending is in proportion to its large population. If measured by the US standard, our military spending is actually far behind our economic growth."

Geng said the rapid development of science and technology meant that it was normal for countries to upgrade their weaponry and equipment, and China is no exception.

"China's weapon and equipment development is based on its national defense, which doesn't target any particular country or region," said Geng.

In recent years, the Chinese military had participated in many overseas military missions with advanced equipment, which had contributed to world and regional peace and stability, he added.

China's Kunlun Mountain dock landing ship, an amphibious warfare ship with a well deck to transport and launch landing craft and amphibious vehicles, served in escort missions in the waters of the Gulf of Aden off Somalia from July 2010 to February 2011.
 

escobar

Brigadier
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


This year marks the 10th anniversary of China Electronics Technology Group Corporation (zhongguo dianzi keji jituan gongsi) - known better by its acronym CETC - one of China's 10 official defense industry conglomerate-bureaucracies [1].

CETC's operations are central to China's push toward dual-use electronics and civil-military integration for information technology. CETC is an entirely state-owned, research and development behemoth with the professed goals of producing advanced electronics for China's military and leveraging civilian technology in order to do so [2].

The organization combines the advantages of state research funding and government favoritism with a market-oriented business model. Far from being a dinosaur in the modern electronics business, it has managed to grow and profit in diverse economic sectors and has forged partnerships with some of the biggest names in electronics.

The broad reach of CETC's business relationships combined with its self-described "sacred mission" of "rich country, strong army" make CETC worthy of closer inspection from anyone concerned with the national defense implications of the Chinese electronics and IT industries.

Origin and function
Under CETC's organizational umbrella are 80,000 employees and myriad subsidiaries. CETC oversees 55 semi-autonomous research institutes (often referred to as RIs) - many of which predate CETC itself and have existed since Mao Zedong's defense modernization push in the late 1950s and 1960s. CETC also includes 184 commercial subsidiary companies - most of which were created by the individual research institutes in the past 20 years.

While CETC itself is a young organization, the research institutes that conduct most of its research and production are the oldest electronics research facilities in China. They are responsible for many of China's major advances in defense electronics, including the electronics for the "Two Bombs and One Satellite" initiative that gave China its first nuclear bomb, guided missile, and geo-orbital satellite. Today, CETC produces a wide range of products for military and civilian markets - from lasers and radar arrays to washing machines and power plants.

Despite its size and its explicit role in developing tactical electronics for the People's Liberation Army (PLA), CETC is not well known outside a small community of China defense analysts. Large private companies like Huawei and ZTE have drawn much more attention and suspicion, most recently becoming the focus of respective US Commerce Department and House intelligence committee investigations.

While it is possible and even likely that private corporations like Huawei and ZTE engage in business dealings with the PLA, they nonetheless primarily are interested in the civilian market, and any contracts with the PLA would comprise only a tiny fraction of their total business. At minimum, Huawei and ZTE deny any direct allegiance to the PLA.

CETC, on the other hand, is very open with its stated purpose of leveraging civilian electronics for the gain of the PLA, and a majority of its products and services are destined for state and military customers. If there is any doubt of CETC's relationship with the military, see the "About Us" (jituan gaikuang) page on its website, especially cached pages from 2006 or earlier, since the most jingoistic language has been toned down since that time.

Diverse business areas
CETC's decentralized structure makes its behavior difficult to track, since its research institutes have widely varying technical specialties, appear to operate more or less autonomously and often operate under pseudonyms [3]. This is largely because all of CETC's research institutes are older than CETC itself and most of them continue the same lines of research they pursued before they were amalgamated into CETC and given a common purpose in 2002.

Some of these, like the 45th RI, appear to almost exclusively develop consumer electronics; others, like the 54th RI, focus heavily on military and aerospace sensors as well as communications systems. With the majority of the RI's, however, the distinction is much less clear. Many of these research foundational technology and manufacture industrial components necessary for the advancement of both the defense and commercial electronics sectors. There are RI's specializing in semiconductors, piezoelectronics, nanotechnology, integrated circuits and industrial control systems - to name but a few.

In turn, almost all of the individual research institutes have their own network of commercial subsidiaries and joint ventures. CETC RIs use their subsidiaries to bring their research to the commercial market and turn a profit, but also to arrange partnerships between the PLA, universities and research organizations as well as Chinese and foreign electronics firms.

Some of these subsidiaries are among China's most notable technology companies, especially in the field of information security, including Venus Software Corporation and Westone Information Industry Company - subsidiaries of 32nd and 30th RIs, respectively. Perhaps incidentally, many of these same companies benefit from government subsidies and tax breaks for their role as "key software enterprises", including Venus and Westone.

Many of these subsidiaries also are not acknowledged officially by their parent research institutes. Venus Software and the 32nd RI do not acknowledge their connections on their websites, even though the institute is Venus's founder and, at least previously, the majority shareholder. This practice, as well as the practice of using pseudonyms for the institutes, helps CETC evade notice and any negative associations with the PLA in its business dealings, especially outside of China.

Supporting civilian and defense economies
CETC's distinguishing feature is that it straddles the line between a military technology research center, a commercial entity and an academic institution. This mixed operations strategy stems directly from a technological development policy that could exist nowhere besides China.

Under this policy, CETC can access government research funding to develop commercial and military electronics while training graduate students and engineers and providing a foundation for the advancement of the Chinese technology industry.

Since at least 2002, Beijing has emphasized civil-military technological integration and the belief that a strong military can only emerge from a vigorous and technologically-advanced civilian economy - a point reiterated in last year's authoritative PLA Day editorials [4].

As the defense economy was reorganized continually at the turn of the millennium, CETC and the other defense industrial organizations were encouraged to assist both sectors to build off of one another while encouraging a marketized defense economy. This involved not just coordinating technology exchanges between industry and the military, but providing preliminary research for both sectors.

When in 2006 China's Defense Middle- and Long-Term Science and Technology Development Plan demanded all defense industrial organizations invest at least 3% of revenue into research and development, CETC was the only one that exceeded this figure, pledging to spend at least 5% [5].

CETC benefits from both government funds and corporate revenue to fund its research. The organization is home to 15 state key laboratories - the designated breeding grounds for technologies the Chinese government deems central to national economic and military strategy. Many of the research institutes also host graduate student technical training programs and recognized national "senior scientists".

These resources provide further funding and expert personnel to CETC's research institutes and allow them to leverage them for either military or civilian projects. CETC's relationship with the PLA is demonstrated further by awards it receives from the General Armaments Department, which is responsible for commissioning PLA weapons systems [6].

The PLA's matchmaker
Since one of CETC's expressed objectives is civil-military integration in the electronics sector, it should be no surprise that CETC and its research institutes pride themselves on their partnerships with large Chinese and international corporations. CETC and its subsidiaries have entered into joint ventures and supplier arrangements with some of the world's largest electronics companies, including IBM, Sun, HP, Cisco, Oracle and, unsurprisingly, Huawei. They also supply their products to a growing list of foreign governments.

CETC operates in many ways like a civilian commercial entity and appears eager to start profitable joint ventures that offer access to the Chinese market, helped by CETC's status as one of China's state-authorized investment institutions. CETC's subsidiaries conduct a diverse range of business with foreign firms and governments, including manufacturing parts for export electronics, providing software outsourcing solutions, engineering radar arrays for foreign governments and marketing advanced foreign electronics in China [7].

In many cases, CETC appears to be the middleman that allows these private companies to do business with the PLA. The CETC 15th RI advertises itself on job-seeking websites, such as Zhaopin.com, as the commercial representative of Huawei and Emerson Electric Company to the PLA, and the 15th RI may not be alone in this role. If this is true for even a few of CETC's subsidiaries, then any company doing business with CETC would suggest tacit abetment of PLA modernization.

Through its subsidiaries, CETC has even managed to establish partnerships with Western military technology firms, bringing their products to the Chinese market. Through its subsidiary group Hebei Far East, the 54th RI has partnered with the US defense contractor Harris Corporation, which, according to its website, provides tactical communications, intelligence and satellite services to the US military, National Security Agency and National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency.

The joint venture, Hebei Far East Harris Communications Company, manufactures a wide range of communications products, including military-grade communications field switches and private mobile radio systems - which it markets in China and the Russian Federation - according to the joint venture's website.

CETC International (CETCI), yet another subsidiary, also is designated as an official Chinese arms export company and markets its products abroad through international branches in Venezuela, Peru, Ecuador, Algeria, Egypt, Morocco, Angola, Sudan, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Thailand, Myanmar and Syria. The CETCI catalog appears to be more limited than that of the collective research institutes, but still openly markets products like mobile signal jammers, microelectronics systems and laser products.

Conclusion
CETC is the crux of China's effort to support the PLA with dual-use electronics and information technology. As a research organization, CETC has access to favorable government policies, science grants, and top technicians. As a business, it can actively attract partners in the private sector and leverage their technology. Finally, as a state-run organization, it uses these resources to openly support the PLA and its modernization program.

CETC's decentralized structure and use of unacknowledged subsidies allow it to stay off of the public radar to a large extent even when private and/or profit-driven companies like Huawei and ZTE cannot. Its partners comprise Chinese and international technology giants, including at least one US intelligence contractor. Additionally, its supplier relationships with major international electronics companies may mean that CETC-designed software and electronics components are more ubiquitous in our everyday electronics than most observers realize.
 

A.Man

Major
A Good Video: A 7 Days Training of A Lanzhou MR Infantry Divison Moved 3000 KMs

[video]http://military.cntv.cn/program/jsjs/20120214/122013.shtml[/video]
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top