Parts of the PLA have told us openly that at one point, they perceived the United States as having a decisionmaking advantage in the military realm. They saw the autonomy and trust that we place upon even junior officers and enlisted. When comparing that system with their own, they concluded that the PLA was not ready. The PLA told us that they felt deterred, and we must continue to leverage that dynamic.
Hilarious. the PLA actually has an institutional history of the exact opposite problem: too much initiative and independence.
Are we being led to believe that these American military experts are supposed to have taken or heeded the advice or concerns of the PLA as being genuine?Hilarious. the PLA actually has an institutional history of the exact opposite problem: too much initiative and independence.
近日,中共中央、国务院、中央军委印发了《军队功勋荣誉表彰条例》(以下简称《条例》),并发出通知,要求各地区各部门认真遵照执行。
《条例》按照勋章、荣誉称号、奖励、表彰、纪念章等,区分战时平时、行业领域、人员类别,对军队功勋荣誉表彰体系进行全面重塑。《条例》创新设立指挥员功勋荣誉表彰措施,体系设计聚焦胜战、聚力强军的勋章奖章纪念章,统一规范军队功勋荣誉表彰获得者待遇,丰富荣誉褒扬激励形式。《条例》还对军队涉外功勋荣誉表彰作了规范。
类别项目上,根据党和国家功勋荣誉表彰项目设置原则,明确军队功勋荣誉表彰的项目包括勋章、荣誉称号、奖励、表彰、纪念章。规范内容上,将军队功勋荣誉表彰实施情形拓展为战时、平时和重大非战争军事行动3种,系统规范功勋荣誉表彰的项目、条件、权限、程序、荣誉标识、待遇、宣扬、管理监督等8个方面,使制度体系更加健全完善。证章体系上,把握勋章彰显至高荣誉、荣誉称号奖章凸显标杆楷模、奖励表彰奖章体现功绩褒奖、纪念章反映荣誉经历的总体定位,创新设计军队勋章、奖章、纪念章,并配套设计证书,构建形成聚焦胜战、聚力强军的军队功勋荣誉表彰证章证书体系。
新设“红旗勋章”和“红星勋章”,设立特级、一级、二级战时荣誉称号和一、二、三、四等战功,设置战时纪念章,充分激发部队高昂战斗热情和旺盛战斗意志。
《条例》坚持精神激励为主、注重物质激励并举,按照等级差异设置、战时高于平时、确保军地衔接的思路,体系化设计功勋荣誉表彰获得者待遇。在荣誉记载方面,明确军队建立功勋荣誉场馆,设立功勋荣誉簿,记载勋章、荣誉称号等获得者及其功绩。在荣誉宣扬方面,规范军队功勋荣誉表彰通知书和喜报寄送有关工作,通过新闻报道等方式,广泛宣扬功勋荣誉表彰获得者先进事迹和精神风范。在荣誉待遇方面,统筹设计功勋荣誉表彰获得者待遇,体系增加军人荣誉激励的“含金量”。
One common misunderstanding of western military analyser is confusing the decision making process of PLA and old soviet red army, especially the position of political officers. Different than the USSR, political officers are the inherent parts of PLA, not implanted from outside. the political officers are naturally join the decision process, but the final decision of military operations is clearly belonging to the chief military officer.Are we being led to believe that these American military experts are supposed to have taken or heeded the advice or concerns of the PLA as being genuine?
One common misunderstanding of western military analyser is confusing the decision making process of PLA and old soviet red army, especially the position of political officers. Different than the USSR, political officers are the inherent parts of PLA, not implanted from outside. the political officers are naturally join the decision process, but the final decision of military operations is clearly belonging to the chief military officer.
Yep, in this document, the author recognised the line between political officers and military officers is blurred. In the history of PLA, there are some cases that political cadres are better at fighting than military cadres. And the Promotional routes are also often staggered.Hilarious. the PLA actually has an institutional history of the exact opposite problem: too much initiative and independence.
The US can't say much about decision making, their Mission Command is a total failure, an excellent story from a USMC military man who correctly exemplified this deficiency:One common misunderstanding of western military analyser is confusing the decision making process of PLA and old soviet red army, especially the position of political officers. Different than the USSR, political officers are the inherent parts of PLA, not implanted from outside. the political officers are naturally join the decision process, but the final decision of military operations is clearly belonging to the chief military officer.