No consequence. China is still buying a lot from Australia and those UK goods are still being bought.
LOL What does buying a lot mean? China put some tariffs and sanctions on Australia and Australia's been nagging and moaning about it. China said that several UK brands like Burberry, etc... can be boycotted in China. Nobody threatened an end to all business so the things you say have no meaning. One could easily say that the US is still buying "a lot" from China and "goods are still being bought" so the entire trade war has no consequence. Incoherent argument with meaningless statements.
The Chinese ambassador in UK said they still want win-win relation with UK. So get out of your bubble and see the real world.
The UK is saying the same thing. Like I said, limited consequences for a limited action. Reading comprehension problem for you again.
You already said once that you want China to be respected.
Quote me. I think you have me confused with someone else again. I might have said something like respect can only be earned through strength, and if you have extremely poor reading comprehension, which you do, you might confuse that to mean something else.
You said there should be reciprocation, but they said that for huawei it is a no. Soon it well be another no for tiktok. So what? China should not really care because China is not defined by Huawei.
Who said it's a no for Huawei/Tiktok? Incoherent statement.
Another stupid and puerile thing Chinese fanboy like to say. What is your problem if UK or Australia or India want to be a US colony? Are you the UK prime minister? If it upset you, it is because you want them to be China colony instead. You want them to have deference to China because China is now a great power.
Another illiterate mentally-degenerate conclusion. My sentence literally said that it's ok if they want to be a colony of the US and you're asking me what the problem is or if it upsets me? Which word did you fail to understand this time? Is it the meaning of "OK?" LOL
Hypocrisy and low self-esteem.
Yes, your problems as we all see.
So make the threats you can really do, not the one you can't do.
Which threats did China make but can't do?
China has not threaten Japan over huawei ban. What is the issue with Australia and Europe?
Japan was never expected to use Huawei and it was clear from the beginning. Chinese culture is already quite anti-Japan and many people don't buy Japanese things unless absolutely necessary. That's not the feeling in China against the UK, but it can be and it should be, which in itself is quite an economic retaliation. The UK has become a battleground for Huawei, which is why it is appropriate for China to respond with reciprocal intensity.
Incoherent arguments.
Trade with Australia is booming and the Chinese ambassador in UK is still cajoling the UK gov after the huawei ban.
If it's booming, then Australia's really flapping its mouth acting like a victim over nothing, isn't it?
What was the threat and how was it empty?
