Did you even read the report? It completely refuted everything you said. If you are not going to look at the evidence, then I don't know why we are here. You've made 2 blatantly incorrect assertions right in a row, and yet do not look back to fix them. Let me repeat some basic points of the USCC report relinked here:
Page 3:
China controls 100% of the rare earths refining technology.
There are 4 steps in rare earths processing. First is mining the ore. Second is separating the ores into oxides and useless rock. Third step is refining oxides into metal (the hard part). The 4th step is alloying the metals to make device materials. The 5th step is creating the device components, like NbFeB super ferromagnets.
The US has nothing in step 1, which you agree with.
The US also has nothing in step 3, the hard part. Surprisingly, they have things in step 2. Step 4 and 5 are the parts we think of as high tech,
and in step 5, China controls 75% of the device market as shown clearly on the graph on page 3.
Is production of 75% of the entire market for NbFeB super ferromagnets "turning iron ore into pig iron, which is not that hard."
Don't bother, this guy loves to make absurd statements without backing it up, I am still waiting for him to show me the proof that Russia have hundreds of fighter jets fitted with AESA radar, while China only have at most a dozen or so fighters that can see beyond visual range.
---------- Post added at 06:21 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:02 PM ----------
China buys out almost all of Australia and Brazil's total production output, this is what's able to drive up the steel production so high. The problem with local Chinese iron ores is that the iron content is very low, the extraction rate out of that 2.4 billion ton is very low compared to those high quality ores from Brazil and Australia. So the number shrinks when we squeeze out the water. But those are not that important. What's important is that the production output is too exaggerated in this discussion. They did produce that many steel, but close to half, maybe even more is from foreign iron ores. What's relevant to this topic is how much China can produce in time of war.
On top of that, I have mentioned already, resources only matter when there are no extreme advantages over the enemy. But in the topic of China Vs the USN, resources doesn't mean anything. China's steel production could be 100 times that of US, but it all went into building constructions. The USN could take out the Chinese entire navy several times.
Let's stop discussing natural resources. The idea of the thread is to talk about technological and industrial capabilities, whereas national mineral reserves don't really matter. Look at Japan, they have nothing, but they make a lot of the best weapons in the world. Their naval fleet is several times larger than that of China's. Their submarine fleets are several generations ahead than that of China. Although their aeronautical industry is very behind, that is due to the leash on their neck, put on by the Americans, not because they can't do it. They almost do a good job on everything they get their hands on. They in fact make better aeronautical composite materials than most US companies. There's even rumours going on lately saying that majority of the fabrication of F35's composite materials will be done in Japan. Although it is still a rumour, it still reflect Japan's prestige in the area. As of current stage, the Japanese SDMF is still far ahead than China's. So resources doesn't mean much unless you're already truly on par with your enemy.
Again, you make wild statements without any source whatsoever, list your source that says China's iron ore's iron content is very low, and that all high iron contents are from outside China. And of course, when the source that are being lists does not fit your point of view, of course they are exaggerated. And again, what make you think China can't transition from a peace economy to war economy with the iron it produces? Source???
Again I said in a prolong war, China will have the advantage with more manufacturing base, yes US have the advantage now, but in a true war, both side will be dead in 30 minutes from ICBM, I am however talking about if war broke out and somehow no ICBM is being used. At the beginning of WW2, Japan's navy out class US navy by a large margin, but when US kicks off it is war production, Japan never had a chance. The same scenario goes for China, they are the 2nd largest ship producer in the world as of right now, do you really think that China can't transition that into building warships? Well who am I kidding, of course you think they can't, and you will make some wide claim without providing any sources.
"Lets stop discussing natural resources?" After you have just made your side of argument with no source to back your up whatsoever, and you expect people to end this discussion and walk away? And what about Japan? Their navy is several times larger than China? Are you freaking kidding?? A simple Wikipedia search will disapprove that stupid claim in 30 second. If Japan is China, then you are right to argue that they cant' transition into a military economy, and they don't have resource etc.. but China is NOT Japan, Japan is an island, China is on the Asia continent, many dozen times larger than Japan island and they have many times more resources in their backyard, and China's manufacturing is also the #1 in the world as I have made the claim, and also supplied a source to back it up (Of course to you, that source is exaggerated/fake).
And the only definite thing you can argue is that there is a RUMOR that Japan is fabricating F-35 composite material.. a rumor, well of course, when a rumor support your argument, they are in fact became a fact.
Seriously dude.... stop talking big without PROVIDING ANY EVIDENCE TO BACK YOU UP WHATSOEVER.