Aimlly don't start with trusting US Did on just 2 reloads to start with.
Not to mention, they don't actually have the correct and precise launch vehicles in the first place.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
China IRBM/SRBM (and non-ICBM/SLBM) thread
- Thread starter Blitzo
- Start date
Not to mention, they don't actually have the correct and precise launch vehicles in the first place.
Aimlly don't start with trusting US Did on just 2 reloads to start with.
Not to mention, they don't actually have the correct and precise launch vehicles in the first place.
In addition, if I recalled correctly - They even have tendencies to underestimate the number of TEL vehicles per brigade for certain DF missiles.
Few interesting claims from Ayi. He says 1. 6000km range ASBM to be unveiled 9/3 (not DF-27?) and 2. DF-26 ASBM variant range is 4000km (shorter than anti-land variant) due to heavier payload.
If the claim is true, and that he's not referring to DF-27 - Perhaps said IRBM (by Chinese standards) will be called DF-36?
Hopefully, based on this IRBM, there would be a further development similar to the DF-16 -> DF-17 and DF-26 -> DF-27 progressions. With this kind of missile, the PLARF can finally put (at least) Oahu and Kitsap within conventional (or optionally, tactical nuclear) strike range.