China Invaded

Gollevainen

Colonel
VIP Professional
Registered Member
Thanks from this enlightening answer, A view like you gave was good for a stance, as I feel that we have lately almoust sunked into nationalistic and country brashing fortest of Chinese and US perspective. Its nice to have chinese members in here whit not so naive/nationalistic perspective (No offense lads, but you just tend to keep me busy when ever you get heated up:p ) in among our few US members who remembers that politics arent allowed in here... Please enjoy whit us and remember to read the rules, introduce in itroduction thread and bal bla bla...:)

Sinodefenceforum moderation team

(and to those who cannot read behind the lines, cut the heat ok?)
 

KYli

Brigadier
Since it is about china invaded, I could want to stay on topic. So this will be my last reply. I do not want to end up being ban:rofl: , because I have a good record of staying quiet at military forum for eight years.:) I enjoy reading about military forum, but I also saw a lot of flame war that end up badly.
Aerodriver, you are right about the Han do have imperalist, but since Ming chinese did not invade country unless self defense. Of course these have much more to do with chinese self arrogrant, but also about Chinese felt they didn't need anything from outside world. They could have everything it needed by itself, that why, when British forced chinese to trade with them cause so many trouble. Because chinese did not feel it needed to trade with anyone, so british used opium as weapon of trade. Which by all the reasons you stated still is one of worst thing that did to human kind. Tibet, I do not really want to go into it, because the west, chinese, tibet all have different opinions. The west think it is imperialist, chinese think it is their land, tibet is divide by two group one support other against it.
As what you said about why the west did not took full control of china, it was mainly because no single country could do it without other countries interfere. Also even China was very weak by then, it still was not a easy task. The people did not support the emperor anymore, but the Warlords will fought the west if the west took their land from them. The World war one also played a major role, the western suffered greatly after it that why the Japanese became much more powerful in China also.
What I am saying about west do not have moral ground to tell other countries what to do, because dictators/leaders could easily gear up supports from the population just by saying the western imperalism. Each time you sanction a country, the only one who suffered were the people. So the dictators could easily say that you the root for the problems. Also the chinese here mostly lived at the west, maybe even born in the west so they propably did not have the prestige to be brainwash by the chinese government.:roll: :roll: I am born in china, but growth up at hK which is the little colony of yours:rofl: . Now I live in US, actually I got most of my education in US and spend most of time here. Personally I could rather people did not called chinese brainwash, because as much as the chinese government control the media. The chinese do know what it is going on in their country, but they might have different opinions from you or each others. Also you may not notice, but the western medias are also as bias.
 

renmin

Junior Member
Aerodriver said:
FIRT SORRY ABOUT THIS LONG POST
As a westerner currently living in China, I am still amazed by the self-centred hatred some, luckily a small minority, of people harbour to the past injustices that the "west" imposed on China. Yes it’s important to look back at history and not forget the past. For example I'm British did you know that concentration camps were not invented by the Germans for us against the Jews? They were invented by the British for use against the Boar in the Boar wars in South Africa in the 1900's. What some people in China need to remember is every country has done bad things in the past and it is not something to be ashamed of, look at them as something you can learn from. I always have to have conversations with Chinese people about the opium wars and how bad Britain was, yet no Chinese person will talk about when the Chinese invaded Vietnam in the 1970's or when it sent troops to fight against a multi-national force under United Nation's command in Korea and I could probably make a list of other shameful things, just as I could make a list of Shameful British or western history. So come on guys, it’s a new century, don't talk about Chinese people thinking westerners are superior because it’s simply not true and any of this anti-western hatred seems to come from uneducated Chinese with small social circles who have never seen the world. China and it's people are great, just as I think Britain and its people are great, but we are both far from perfect AND remember there is always two sides to every story.........including the opium wars and the burning of the summer palace etc.

And I quote from RENMIN “like I said the opium war was to weaken the Chinese with drugs make them lazy and tired every day, then come in and take them out.â€
Sorry but I have never heard so much Crap in my life. The war was simply about money and trade, not so we could weaken you to invade, most of the contact between China and the west between 1700-1900 was about trade. Due to the Cohong that the Chinese emperor set up (to basically make money for the emperor) there was quickly a large imbalance of trade. The British through the east India company sent James Flint, a Chinese speaking trader (note the Chinese government of the time had band traders from learning Chinese so the government could control trade and change tariffs) to complain about restrictions in incoming trade and corruption in the Cohong. He was imprisoned for presenting petitions from Chinese nationals who wanted to trade freely, learning Chinese and sailing to a port in northern China. The British then sent another representative, Lord Macartney to try set up permanent diplomatic relations in Beijing and allow fixed tariffs and more inward trade. He was refused.
Due to the now large trade imbalance, we British loved our tea, Britain through the East India Company sold large amounts of Opium to CHINESE traders (although licensed by Britain) in INDIA, who then shipped it to Chinese smugglers in S.China.
In 1838 A Chinese official , Lin Zexu, was sent by the emperor to India to ask the British to stop the trade, also in this time a letter was sent to Queen Victoria asking her to stop the trade, the letter was ignored by Britain. During negotiations, partly because he was not taken seriously he took 350 foreigners hostage, including the British Superintendent of the area ( Charles Elliot)- which as you could imagine somewhat angered the British. Anyway it was agreed that all opium trade was to be stopped and the hostages released. Which would have been a good end to the whole process. However in 1839 the Qing Dynasty ordered all British to leave Guangzhou (the only treaty/trading port in china for foreigners) and terminated trade between China and Britain. Britain then sent forces, and only British forces were involved at this time, to force the Chinese government to resume trade. The out come of this conflict was equal relations between Britain and china; four more ports open to foreign trade, abolition of the Cohong and unfair import tariffs and the surrender of HK in perpetuity.- I'm not saying that is fair, but it is truth.
Money and Trade? that is true, but its a lot bigger than that. I am not offending you just stating points out. have you considered the property destroyed, a beiutiful garden burned in beijing, thousands of priceless jeulary, antiques, pottery all stolen? Yes it was money, but why come here and steal?
 
To get one historical point straight:
North Korea attacked South Korea WITHOUT the consent of the Soviets or the Chinese.

I would like to re-emphasize that as military enthusiasts, as patriots of whichever nation you belong, that the main lesson of China being invaded, as in many cases of other countries being invaded, is two-fold:
- Don't allow your country to rot from within
- Maintain the means as best as you can to deter abuse from without
 

adeptitus

Captain
VIP Professional
Aerodriver said:
I think in the modern day, invading any country "to teach them a lesson" is very shameful.
<snip>
In my opinion if the imperial powers wanted to cut China up into colonies it would have happened, the population did not on the whole support the emperors and the western powers had more than enough firepower if needed,
<snip>
As for Korea, without Chinese help and diplomatic pressure the war would not have started in the first place if the north, under Chinese direction did not invade to south.

1) They rename "invading to teach you a lesson" to a more politcally-correct term "police action". Different name, but all the same.

2) From a US-centric point of view, the EU Imperial powers and Japan did want to carve up Chinese territory, but it'd harm US trade interest and access to Chinese market. From 1898-1900, then-US Secretary John Hay convinced EU powers to abide by the "open door policy", which guarenteed equal access to Chinese market and protected Chinese territorial integrity.

20 years later, the US again tabled the Nine-Power Treaty to ensure the continuation of the Open Door Policy. It worked for a while until the Sino-Japanese War & WW2. If you're not from the US or grew up reading US-centric history books, your opinion on this part of history may differ.

3) The leadership of the communist block was Soviet Union, under Stalin, not Mao or the PRC. Kim Il Sung went to Stalin to ask "can I invade", not Mao.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Between 1945 and 1950 the relative importance of North Korea (the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, or DPRK) had not increased dramatically, and Stalin had refused Kim Il Sung’s repeated requests for permission to invade South Korea. By 1950, however, Stalin saw an opportunity to build on Communist success in Asia and, by so doing, relieve some of the pressure on the Soviet Union in Europe. He also sought to bring Mao’s successful revolution into line with the Soviet Union’s foreign policy goals.

In April 1950 Kim Il Sung again begged for a chance to unify Korea, promising that the campaign would be over in three days. Stalin gave his permission, provided that the Chinese agreed to support the North Korean action (5). Mao, in desperate need of Soviet military and economic aid, quickly agreed. Mao also released over sixty thousand combat-hardened ethnic Koreans from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) for duty with the Korean People’s Army (KPA, the North Korean Army).


Aerodriver said:
And I quote from RENMIN “like I said the opium war was to weaken the Chinese with drugs make them lazy and tired every day, then come in and take them out.”
Sorry but I have never heard so much Crap in my life. The war was simply about money and trade, not so we could weaken you to invade,

The harmful effects of opium was well known by 1820's (i.e. Thomas de Quincey's Confessions of an English Opium Eater). For the British, who were profiting from opium trade, they see it as pure business. The American scholars at Harvard University, who observed the effect of opium on Chinese immigrants, called the opium trade "the most long continued and systematic international crime".

There is no question that the opium dealers knew fully well what the effect of their product was to the customers. The famed western tradition of ethics, or moral philosophy was severly lacking in these British subjects.
 
Last edited:

silverpike

New Member
yea, the offical name of that 'incident' in 'the invasion of the eight west powers'. Britian, France, Russia, and Japan are the four major forces, other countries are basically sending troops as a symbol of war(because it was the Qing Empire that declear war on them in the frist place) some counties like italy only sent less than 50 soilders...

there has been many wars with the west after the opium war, the second opium war, sino-french war,sino-french,british war... the western shouldn't be too suprised that in fact many of chinese people still hates the west.
 

Sendoh

New Member
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

This link is although long, should bring enlightenment to those who need more background information on the events leading up to the 8 nation alliance "invading" china. I personally believe Wikipedia is a pretty credible source...

China was such an inviting target....
the emperor or soon to be emperor!!!!!
puyi5pe.jpg

Some pics depicting boxer rebellion
boxer3jf.jpg

boxerrebellion2xl.jpg


a while later....
500pxforeignarmies5yi.jpg

:mad:
 
Last edited by a moderator:

WEN?

New Member
are does japanese,french and german flags being paraded around??? so Russia has a part in this. well get mongolia back sometime soon. wikipedia is a good site but everyone can post an article there so information is not always correct. i do believe a editor does read it before it goes on the site.
 
D

Deleted member 675

Guest
WEN? said:
wikipedia is a good site but everyone can post an article there so information is not always correct. i do believe a editor does read it before it goes on the site.

An editor doesn't have to read an edit before it is made. And I don't think they have to approve a new article either. But many responsible individuals keep track of changes so they can easily revert vandalism or very biased points back.
 
Top