antiterror13
Brigadier
the USA planned to have 200+ hardened sheltered for "only" 50 MX ICBM. The U.S. deployed hundreds of silos for Minuteman ICBM, far more than needed for a one‑to‑one counterforce strike. The Soviets had to plan to hit every silo to be sure.More silos than missiles is a stupid strategy that no country ever used.
More silos is useful as it forces an adversary to waste far more warheads than you actually have missiles to protect. This is called a “shell game” basing strategy.
The logic; suppose you have 100 missiles but 300 silos. An adversary doesn’t know which silos are empty or decoys. To guarantee destroying your missiles, they must target every silo. That means they must spend at least 300 warheads (likely 3x 300) to eliminate 100 missiles. This multiplies the cost of a first strike and makes it irrational. It’s pure deterrence math.
USA, Soviet and now China were/are doing it for the same logic. Remember that China also have many mobile ICBM, IRBM. This silo is to make the calculation much more complicated and difficult


