Speaking of flankers, Deino what’s your view on PLAAF’s deployment of J-16D? We’re seeing at least 2 batches produced and they are (if I remember correctly) in active service, but are they being mixed with regular J-16, say 2-4 J-16D per J-16 brigade? Or are they forming units comprising solely of J-16D which is I believe what the US Navy is doing with their growlers?Can we can back to the topic, namely Chinese Flankers?
You can only do so much on UI/Algorithm/software optimization no? At certain point dont you need to upgrade the hardware (mission computer), other computing unit to faster process/send signals? Perhaps on the AI side of things you can constantly upgrade it to reduce some pilot workload.View attachment 102167
Interview with a J-16 pilot. Basically says that his J-16 has seen many upgrades since it left factory several years ago. Now, his aircraft is using the latest version.
That confirms the Yankee/Shilao comment that J-16 avionics can easily be upgraded similar to OTA upgrade with your phone or Tesla (except it probably needs to be back at the base. A lot of the upgrades are just with software.
You can only do so much on UI/Algorithm/software optimization no? At certain point dont you need to upgrade the hardware (mission computer), other computing unit to faster process/send signals? Perhaps on the AI side of things you can constantly upgrade it to reduce some pilot workload.
So one-pedal system for J-16 confirmed? (just jokingView attachment 102167
Interview with a J-16 pilot. Basically says that his J-16 has seen many upgrades since it left factory several years ago. Now, his aircraft is using the latest version.
That confirms the Yankee/Shilao comment that J-16 avionics can easily be upgraded similar to OTA upgrade with your phone or Tesla (except it probably needs to be back at the base. A lot of the upgrades are just with software.
I just want to make it clear that I'm not saying every upgrade is software. I'm just saying this confirms that they can upgrade software (probably in some cases just supporting more ground strike weapons and features) without taking them back to the factory. There is no way you can upgrade hardware once a year.You can only do so much on UI/Algorithm/software optimization no? At certain point dont you need to upgrade the hardware (mission computer), other computing unit to faster process/send signals? Perhaps on the AI side of things you can constantly upgrade it to reduce some pilot workload.
from a hardware-software prespective, since they are using the same bus, same code, so theoritically, you can update your hardware dynamically just like software, simplely, pluge in and out with minor software updatesYou can only do so much on UI/Algorithm/software optimization no? At certain point dont you need to upgrade the hardware (mission computer), other computing unit to faster process/send signals? Perhaps on the AI side of things you can constantly upgrade it to reduce some pilot workload.
You can only do so much on UI/Algorithm/software optimization no? At certain point dont you need to upgrade the hardware (mission computer), other computing unit to faster process/send signals? Perhaps on the AI side of things you can constantly upgrade it to reduce some pilot workload.
My point is money. If you buy fewer J-16's then there is more money for better and more equipment around the plane like pods, PGM's, missile's and better HMS. The PLA has always planned for a short war under high tech conditions. Maybe after Ukraine China needs to plan for a longer war. And you will need more munitions to fight that longer war. And I also feel that more money should go to the ground forces that is not getting the same attention as the air force and navy.
And do you really need that many J-16's when you have the J-20 and the J-35 is around the corner.
If you plan for a long war but get a short war, no problems.
But if you plan for a short war and you get a long war, Big problems!