China Flanker Thread III (land based, exclude J-15)

Schwerter_

Junior Member
Registered Member
Can we can back to the topic, namely Chinese Flankers?
Speaking of flankers, Deino what’s your view on PLAAF’s deployment of J-16D? We’re seeing at least 2 batches produced and they are (if I remember correctly) in active service, but are they being mixed with regular J-16, say 2-4 J-16D per J-16 brigade? Or are they forming units comprising solely of J-16D which is I believe what the US Navy is doing with their growlers?
 

tphuang

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
J16+Interview_Upgraded-Nov20.jpg
Interview with a J-16 pilot. Basically says that his J-16 has seen many upgrades since it left factory several years ago. Now, his aircraft is using the latest version.

That confirms the Yankee/Shilao comment that J-16 avionics can easily be upgraded similar to OTA upgrade with your phone or Tesla (except it probably needs to be back at the base. A lot of the upgrades are just with software.
 

LCR34

Junior Member
Registered Member
View attachment 102167
Interview with a J-16 pilot. Basically says that his J-16 has seen many upgrades since it left factory several years ago. Now, his aircraft is using the latest version.

That confirms the Yankee/Shilao comment that J-16 avionics can easily be upgraded similar to OTA upgrade with your phone or Tesla (except it probably needs to be back at the base. A lot of the upgrades are just with software.
You can only do so much on UI/Algorithm/software optimization no? At certain point dont you need to upgrade the hardware (mission computer), other computing unit to faster process/send signals? Perhaps on the AI side of things you can constantly upgrade it to reduce some pilot workload.
 

Blitzo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
You can only do so much on UI/Algorithm/software optimization no? At certain point dont you need to upgrade the hardware (mission computer), other computing unit to faster process/send signals? Perhaps on the AI side of things you can constantly upgrade it to reduce some pilot workload.

We don't know if the upgrades that the pilot is referring to is merely software or if it also involves elements of hardware upgrades.

It is pretty normal for modern aircraft to be designed to upgrade both hardware and software in more convenient fashion than past generations of aircraft.
 

Schwerter_

Junior Member
Registered Member
View attachment 102167
Interview with a J-16 pilot. Basically says that his J-16 has seen many upgrades since it left factory several years ago. Now, his aircraft is using the latest version.

That confirms the Yankee/Shilao comment that J-16 avionics can easily be upgraded similar to OTA upgrade with your phone or Tesla (except it probably needs to be back at the base. A lot of the upgrades are just with software.
So one-pedal system for J-16 confirmed? (just joking
 

tphuang

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
You can only do so much on UI/Algorithm/software optimization no? At certain point dont you need to upgrade the hardware (mission computer), other computing unit to faster process/send signals? Perhaps on the AI side of things you can constantly upgrade it to reduce some pilot workload.
I just want to make it clear that I'm not saying every upgrade is software. I'm just saying this confirms that they can upgrade software (probably in some cases just supporting more ground strike weapons and features) without taking them back to the factory. There is no way you can upgrade hardware once a year.

Being able to make software upgrade from base should be a feature of newly developed aircraft.
 

stannislas

Junior Member
Registered Member
You can only do so much on UI/Algorithm/software optimization no? At certain point dont you need to upgrade the hardware (mission computer), other computing unit to faster process/send signals? Perhaps on the AI side of things you can constantly upgrade it to reduce some pilot workload.
from a hardware-software prespective, since they are using the same bus, same code, so theoritically, you can update your hardware dynamically just like software, simplely, pluge in and out with minor software updates
 

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
You can only do so much on UI/Algorithm/software optimization no? At certain point dont you need to upgrade the hardware (mission computer), other computing unit to faster process/send signals? Perhaps on the AI side of things you can constantly upgrade it to reduce some pilot workload.

Even in the case of hardware they are modularized and could be easily swapped out for upgrades. Lack of modularization is actually a major reason why upgrading Russian flankers is a big headache for the PLA.
 

plawolf

Lieutenant General
My point is money. If you buy fewer J-16's then there is more money for better and more equipment around the plane like pods, PGM's, missile's and better HMS. The PLA has always planned for a short war under high tech conditions. Maybe after Ukraine China needs to plan for a longer war. And you will need more munitions to fight that longer war. And I also feel that more money should go to the ground forces that is not getting the same attention as the air force and navy.

And do you really need that many J-16's when you have the J-20 and the J-35 is around the corner.

If you plan for a long war but get a short war, no problems.

But if you plan for a short war and you get a long war, Big problems!

I’m pretty sure money isn’t a bottleneck these days, rather production capacity. Since J16s and missiles are not made in the same factory or use the same parts, there is no real obstacle to China buying both since there isn’t a direct trade-off between the two. The big choices seems to be in terms of what mix of planes and missiles and drones to produce. Even there China is almost going into cheat mode and selecting the ‘more of everything’ option by significantly increasing production capacity basically across the board.
 
Top