But Koreans and Chinese alike cite too heavy pressure for children education a reason they don't want more. And it directly delays child birth. The fundamental problem is limited educational resources.
Would increasing the 9-year mandatory education to 12 years (high school included) be too prohibitively expensive?
Another option is to give private school more space to grow, so rich kids would go to certified privately owned middle and high schools out of their families’ pocket books, whilst public schools would be for the lower middle class and blue collar kids. But this option by itself would exacerbate the wealth gap and social stratification, as high-skilled professors and teachers would all join private schools as opposed to public ones. One way to regulate it is to set up party cells in private schools to indoctrinate rich kids and require them to go though basic military trainings, but such political moves do little to address the disparity in educational resources. It is the same issue with every country’s medical system, including those of the U.S. and China.
How about for both post-graduate doctors and school teachers, they must serve in public hospitals and schools for 7-10 years before they could receive the licenses to work in private clinics and teach in private schools? In this sense, whilst imperfect, there would at least be a supply to doctors and teachers for public institutions, whilst the upper middle class and rich could still enjoy the superior service if they are willing to pay out of their own pocket?