But they almost certainly didn’t, so I’m not sure why you’re saying something like that.If I shot down my own NOAA weather balloon I too would keep that quiet to avoid embarrassment.
Here's someone's analysis why he thinks the 2nd balloon/object is a NCAA weather balloon. He used NCAA's HYSPLIT model, the same model that was used to suggest the first balloon was launched in central China. HYSPLIT model suggest the 2nd balloon was launched from Kotzebue WSO in Alaska.But they almost certainly didn’t, so I’m not sure why you’re saying something like that.
Really, how do you know for sure? looks like youre making assumptions, just like how the previous balloon it was a spy balloon and now a weather balloon. Pretty hypocriticalBut they almost certainly didn’t, so I’m not sure why you’re saying something like that.
NORAD has determined what the object shot down over Canada was, but would not reveal detailsMay I assume that the US purposely not to identify the object? There's no reason that they don't know what those things are. They sent aircraft to check and they are professional people.
That's what I'm saying, they know what the things are but they just don't reveal it and let the public speculate it. Adding that the MSM are trying to link the incidents together. Making the situation even worse.NORAD has determined what the object shot down over Canada was, but would not reveal details
Except we know from mapping the path that there was a NCAA weather balloon there right as the shoot down happened.But they almost certainly didn’t, so I’m not sure why you’re saying something like that.