China Ballistic Missiles and Nuclear Arms Thread
- Thread starter peace_lover
- Start date
- Status
From the article:
No need to "reduce international concerns". China should start ramping up nuclear warhead production. This is a volatile period and having such a small number of nuclear weapons is a national security issue.
10000 please... dont be shy China... build them nukes like you build highways and high speed rail
plawolf
Lieutenant General
China doesn’t bother with small yield tactical nukes because it treats nukes as the last resort, not first response. Chinese nukes are overwhelmingly megaton yield city killers.How heavy is China nuclear warhead? China doesn't have nuclear-armed cruise missile like BGM-109 Tomahawk or AGM-86 ALCM meaning that China nuclear warhead have more fissile material and actually very heavy (need more rocket fuel to carry). China needs more nuclear test to miniature their nuclear warhead(physics package). Maybe can test in north korea to avoid worldwide sanction. For example W80 yield 150kt and weight about 130kg compared to china lightest warhead yield 200kt-300kt which is 500kg.
W80 warhead ~150kt max yield. Look at how small it is
View attachment 70437
If anyone is stupid enough to use kiloton tactical nukes against China, they will eat megaton yield strategic ones in response. ‘Sos, ‘dem be all we have!
Nukes are genocidal weapons; they poison you down to the genetic level; we still don’t know the long term genetic effects of those Hiroshima and Nagasaki survivors.
It should be appropriate that the white anglos all equally get their fair share of radiation and genetic poisoning- after all, they mustn’t believe they can poison Asians again without recourse.
Where did you get that info?
It should also revoke the no-first use policy and adopt use at will policy while keeping 2000 of its nukes always ready to launch just like Russia and the USA.
@BoraTas the reason for the UNDERSTANDING between Russia and China is that the Russia provide the muscle (nuclear weapon) while China provide the butter (economics) while both side built up their respective weaknesses. I think its a perfect complement , if the US use nuclear weapon on the Chinese the Russian will automatically respond that is the principle of MAD.
China should not entrust something as important as strategic nuclear deterrence to any other nation... for its very existential survival is at stake.
US could just persuade Russia to gang up and both take China out of the picture and they can share the spoils and postpone peak oil by another 30 years with 1.4 billion wiped out.... and US will backstab Russia again but thats what it does best
Remember at one time USSR asked US for permission to nuke China.... after Putin retires tables could turn again
plawolf
Lieutenant General
You guys realise that ‘300’ warhead figure is pretty much something the west pulled out of its butt right?
Basically the sequence of events that led to it can be summed up as:
The west: China, you need to be transparent and tell us how many nukes you got!
China: Yes
The west: This guy says you got 300, such a puny number haha! Wanna set the record straight?
China: Yes
The west:...So he was right and you only got 300 nukes?
China: Sure.
Basically the sequence of events that led to it can be summed up as:
The west: China, you need to be transparent and tell us how many nukes you got!
China: Yes
The west: This guy says you got 300, such a puny number haha! Wanna set the record straight?
China: Yes
The west:...So he was right and you only got 300 nukes?
China: Sure.
- Status