Why do I see this report and its subsequent news coverage (China training pilot to strike US, Reuters, CNN and BBC) as more of a budge demanding act rather than professional report?
The condensed line goes like this, China is increasing airborne nuclear strike capability (true triad), so we need money for B-21. The audience is clearly the congressmen who are into capability and expense rather than accuracy of the report.
The condensed line goes like this, China is increasing airborne nuclear strike capability (true triad), so we need money for B-21. The audience is clearly the congressmen who are into capability and expense rather than accuracy of the report.