China Ballistic Missiles and Nuclear Arms Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

Hendrik_2000

Lieutenant General
From Henri K blog it said they have tested this new missile 5 times already and close to deployment.
China develops two new airborne ballistic missile systems
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

BY
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


While Russia has officially announced the commissioning of a new hypersonic missile known as Kh-47M2 " Kinjhal ", which is no more or less an airborne ballistic missile system, China on its side would also be developing two missiles of the same concept but this time in all discretion.

The news was first revealed in early March by Lieutenant General Robert Ashley, director of the US Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), in
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
on threats to the national security.

These capabilities are being augmented with two new air-launched ballistic missiles, one of which may include a nuclear payload - Lt. Gen. Robert Ashley

Ashley said in his speech that the Chinese rocket force is strengthening its conventional and nuclear capabilities to accurately strike targets down to Guam, which is the main US military base in the western Pacific. 'Supporting both the DF-21 anti-ship ballistic missile (in fact the DF-21D) and also the DF-26 long-range missile, itself capable of hitting fixed targets on the ground or moving to the sea. All this is complemented by a growing panoply of cruise missiles of all kinds, as well as "two new airborne ballistic missiles, one of which could carry a nuclear charge".

The statement of the director of the DIA, if it gives credibility on the existence of such a development program in China, only confirms in fact rumors circulating for two years, saying that a platform capable of transporting a mid-range anti-ship ballistic missile - derived from the H-6K bomber and equipped with a refueling pole to maintain or increase its range - would have reached the final stage of development. The first maiden flight would have taken place in December 2016.

And the reference H-6N, whose meaning is not known to date, also appears in some recent publications of the Chinese aircraft manufacturer AVIC (see our file "
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
").

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

The amateur photo of what he thinks is the H-6N, with a refueling pole in flight (Photo: APFSDS-.)

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Fan-art image on carrying a ballistic missile by an H-6 bomber

Unaware of its official designation given by the Chinese army, the US intelligence services have referenced one of these two new Chinese missiles "CH-AS-X-13", AS for Anti-Ship probably, and estimating the reach of the craft at about 3,000 km.

And according to US government sources, relayed by
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, this Chinese missile has already made five test shots. The first took place in December 2016, and the last one in the last week of January this year.

If it is difficult to reconstitute with open sources the first flight test of the system, since no less than 17 similar ballistic activities were identified during the month of December in 2016, the last test dating from January 2018 seems easier to trace.

Indeed, if we filter in messages to aircrafts (NOTAM) valid between January 28 and 31 this year and around Dingxing Air Base where most of the Chinese air weapons tests take place, it is thought that this fifth Test indicated by US sources would have occurred either on January 30 between 3:20 pm and 4:10 pm Beijing time, or January 31st to two separate windows.

A0321 / 18
Q) ZLHW / QARLC / IV / NBO / E /
000/999 / A) ZLHW B) 1801300720 C) 1801300810
E) THE FLOW SEGMENTS OF ATS RTE CLSD:
1. V67: NUKTI - JIAYUGUAN VOR'CHW '.
2. B215: IBANO - NUKTI.
3. G470: IBANO-BIKNO.
4. W191: MOVBI - KARVI.
5. W187: KARVI-TUSLI - OBDEG.
6. W192: TUSLI - RUSDI.
7. THE SEGMENTS WI AN AREA CENTERED AT ZLDH AIRPORT WITH RADIUS OF
60KM CLSD.

A0319 / 18
Q) ZWUQ / QARLC / IV / NBO / E /
000/999 / A) ZWUQ B) 1801300720 C) 1801300810
E) THE FLV SEGMENTS OF ATS RTE CLSD:
1. W192: ESDEX-RUSDI.
2. W187: SADAN-OBDEG.
3. Y1: SADAN-MAGOD.
4. L888: SADAN-TONAX.
5. W112: 300KM EAST OF HOTAN VOR'HTN'-ADMUX.
F) GND G) UNL

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

NOTAMs A0321 / 18 and A0319 / 18 (Image: East Pendulum)

Just like the " Kinjhal " whose development is based on a 9M723 short-range Russian ground-to-ground ballistic missile (from the Iskander 9K720 system), it is thought that the Chinese CASIC missile group engineers have adopted the same approach, to reduce the cycle development, basing the design of the "CH-AS-X-13" on the DF-21 medium-range ballistic missile, and more specifically the AShBM DF-21D if the new missile is indeed intended to hit large targets naval vessels at the sea.

Given the relatively large size of the DF-21 / DF-21D, which is 1.4 meters in diameter and 10.7 meters long for the terrestrial version, it is not surprising that the Chinese need design a larger platform than the MiG-31K to transport and launch the new missile.

As for the estimated range of 3,000 km for the "CH-AS-X-13" against about 1,500 km for the DF-21D, this remains consistent when we know that the announced range of " Kinjhal " has been multiplied by four by compared to his twin Ground-Ground.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

The DF-21D TELs (bottom) and the DF-26 TELs with twice the range, both capable of hitting ships while sailing (Photo: Chinese Army)

The question now arises as to the purpose of such an airborne missile system and its possible operational deployment. If this "CH-AS-X-13" is actually designed for anti-ship, especially against aircraft carriers that remain an "obsession" in every sense of the term of the Chinese army over the past 30 years why develop such a capacity when it would duplicate the DF-21D Ground-Sea on the one hand, and the long-range DF-26 on the other?

Without being behind the scenes of little secrets, it is believed that the new "CH-AS-X-13" is being used to expand the range of existing "anti-aircraft carrier" weapons, and to add an extra dimension as well as greater operational flexibility to the global Chinese "Anti Access / Area Denial" (A2 / AD) system. This multiplication of offensive missiles would make countermeasures more difficult to maintain and succeed.

Its development also makes it possible to convert the DF-21D Ground-Sea, initially limited in range, to double its range to reach the same level as the IRBM DF-26. On the other hand, it does not seem to be technically or operationally relevant to develop an Air-Ground version based on it.

And the associated technologies would not be solely dedicated to the military field and could be beneficial to some civilian programs. For example, this could allow CASIC, also a major player in the Chinese aerospace sector, to develop an airborne satellite launcher, similar to what it does with
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.

As for the question on the eventual operational deployment of the missile, it will probably remain in the direction of the ocean, ie towards the Pacific Ocean of one and the South China Sea of the other, with a possible extension to the Indian Ocean.

In view of its relatively short development, since the first pre-studies of "anti-aircraft airborne ballistic missile" seem to have started around 2005, it would be again a "pragmatic" and "contextual" weapon of the Chinese army, as for example the hypersonic glider missile DF-17 and the AVIC hypersonic reconnaissance drone, which has a very precise and targeted objective, and therefore would not have a more global utility outside the sphere A2 / AD Chinese.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

One of the Chinese R & D documents from 2005 on the subject of the airborne ballistic missile dedicated to anti-ship missions

Henri K.
 
Last edited:

by78

General
Half a dozen DF-16 TELs at a recent exercise....

(2048 x 1222)
42037724575_63c36b6d17_o.jpg
 

Hendrik_2000

Lieutenant General
How is one ahead of your competitor when you only test 4 missile with 20% success rate. and your competitor fire 9 or 10 missile with 90% success rate
Selva: China Could Deploy Hypersonic Weapons on a 'Large Scale' (UPDATED)
6/21/2018
By
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


China has advanced its hypersonic weapons to the point where it could potentially deploy them on a large scale, a top U.S. military officer warned June 21.

Hypersonic missiles can travel at speeds of Mach 5 or faster and they pose a major challenge to existing missile defense systems, Pentagon officials have said.

To date, China has been developing high speed, long-range precision missiles on a “micro” scale, said Air Force Gen. Paul Selva, vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

“They haven’t mass deployed hypersonics or long-range [tactical] ballistic missiles” yet, he said during a panel discussion at the Center for a New American Security in Washington, D.C. However, “what they have done is proven the technologies, and so they are able now to deploy those capabilities at a large scale" if they decide to move in that direction, he added.

The United States is behind in the demonstration of those types of technologies, but in some ways it still maintains an advantage, he noted.

“We are way ahead in a lot of the sensor and sensor-integration technologies and we have to maintain that edge,” he said.

Beijing has stated that it wants to reach technological parity with the United States in the early 2020s, and technological superiority by the early 2030s. Russia, too, is making major investments in its military including developing hypersonic weapons.

“If we just sit back and don’t react we will lose our technological superiority” over China, Selva said.

In April, the Air Force announced that it had awarded Lockheed Martin an indefinite quantity, indefinite delivery contract worth up to $928 million to develop a hypersonic, air-launched standoff weapon.

"What we’re really trying to do there is prototype using ... [new rapid prototyping] authorities to see what we can advance, and what the art of the possible is to see how quickly we can get a capability out there," Lt. Gen. Arnold Bunch, military deputy to the assistant secretary of the Air Force for acquisitions, technology and logistics, told reporters during a June 21 meeting at the Pentagon.

The service is streamlining the development process as much as possible for the hypersonic conventional strike weapon, or HCSW program, he noted.

"We’re trying to pull it two to three or more years left of what we would do by being a traditional program and doing a bunch of the other activities" that are part of the traditional acquisition process, he added.

The 2018 national defense strategy — which identified China and Russia as the Pentagon's primary national security challenges — highlighted hypersonics as a key technology area in an era of great power competition.


“It’s very clear from our national defense strategy ... that we intend to react" to what the Chinese are doing, Selva said. “If you accept that the Chinese are trying to offset our capability in the Western Pacific and that the Russians are trying to offset our capability in Europe, it’s incumbent upon us as strategists to react to that ambition.”

The Defense Department must "analyze what your opponent is trying to do to you, make this a competition ... and checkmate them or prevent them from getting so much of an advantage that they can prevent you from doing the things that are in your national interest,” he added.

The Pentagon is making substantial investments into research-and-development programs related to long-range precision strike and high-speed weapons, he noted. The United States is also trying to develop ways to counter those types of weapons.

The Defense Department’s budget is nearly $700 billion, he noted.

“Given the size of our budget, if we don’t have the money to do this then we’re not paying attention,” he said. “We have to put the money where it matters and that means allocating money to research and development in the technologies that are important to achieve asymmetric approaches to both China and Russia’s technology trends.”

Robert Work, a senior fellow for defense and national security at CNAS, and a former deputy secretary of defense, said the United States faces a new reality as China and Russia beef up their capabilities.

“Since the end of World War II, the United States has generally been the power that has been offsetting the quantitative superiority of our adversaries and we’ve done so from a consistent position of technological superiority,” he said. “But in China, and to a lesser degree Russia, we are dealing with competitors that are keenly focused on offsetting our technological superiority even as they strive for technological parity and eventually technological superiority.”

Work, during his time at the Pentagon, championed the “third offset strategy,” which sought to increase the U.S. military's technological overmatch over other nations. However, the Chinese also have their own version of such a strategy that they have been working on for decades, he noted.

“After reviewing what the Chinese military has been able to do in the last two decades and what they are planning to do in the next decade, any objective assessment in my view must conclude that the U.S. joint force is perilously close to being the victim of a very patient, exquisitely targeted and robustly resourced ... offset strategy.”

China is pursing this strategy on a number of fronts, including through industrial and technical espionage on a broad scale, and the development of artificial intelligence technology, he noted.
 

Hendrik_2000

Lieutenant General
This article does not make sense if this is real DF 41 base Why Sichuan?. Isn't northern hemisphere a better place closest distance to CONUS?. From our good colonel
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


China’s new, secret missile garrison in Sichuan can target all of India and beyond
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
27 June, 2018

Y1.001-1.jpeg

China's new PLARF base | Vinayak Bhat/ThePrint
The location of the garrison, confirmed through satellite imagery here, can possibly support a brigade-sized intercontinental ballistic missile formation.

New Delhi: China has built a new garrison in its central Sichuan province for its intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBM) which have the capacity to cover all of India, the Indian Ocean Region as well as large parts of continental America.

On 27 May, the 10th test of the Dongfeng-41 or DF-41 (East Wind-41) ICBM, with a reported range of 12,000-15,000 km, was conducted at the Taiyuan Space Launch Center in Shanxi province. China’s PLARF, or the People’s Liberation Army Rocket Force, formerly Second Artillery Corps (SAC), claimed it a success.

upload_2018-6-27_9-53-39.jpeg

ThePrint has now identified a never-before revealed PLARF location, which may possibly be a DF-41 garrison, with the help of satellite imagery.

ThePrint had in April
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
that PLARF had built a garrison in the southernmost Hainan province to store DF-31AG missile.

The location
This is the first time that the new Chinese garrison has been confirmed through satellite imagery (as of 7 May, 2018), although it has been covered by ground human intelligence before.

It is located 15 km east of Yibin town in Sichuan province, away from towns and cities but close to a highway to enable quick deployment. Construction is said to have begun three years ago.

The entire complex can possibly support a brigade-sized ballistic missile formation.

The ICBM is likely to be armed with 10 multiple independently targetable re-entry vehicle (MIRV) warheads each with 150kT yield.

upload_2018-6-27_9-54-4.jpeg

This new garrison is typically built around a sports track with a football field in it. It also has two basketball grounds and an obstacle course adjoining the sports track.

There are two large highbay garages in the centre of the complex along with two smaller highway garages to the north of the facility. The smaller highbay garages were probably built for warhead assembly.

There are two locations where dugouts are observed. These could possibly be underground DES igloos.

upload_2018-6-27_9-54-57.jpeg

There are about 15 triple storied C-shaped barracks, possibly for troops’ living accommodations.

Three large multi-storey buildings connected with each other could be administrative offices. A meteorological station with possible satellite link is also seen to the west side of the complex.

All buildings except central administrative buildings and high-bay garages are provided with slanted box gable roofs.
upload_2018-6-27_9-57-33.jpeg

The entire garrison with its support buildings has a very high-walled security with four entrances. The main entrance is heavily guarded with around 200m approach under visual observation with the help of a large convex mirror.

It has typical layout of eight garages with six of them being interconnected. There are 30 smaller buildings (15 on either side of highbay garages) with different dimensions which are difficult to assess.

In the latest satellite image, a large tractor trailer of 22m is seen plying on the highway 400 metre south of the complex, suggesting that DF-41 truck erector launcher (TEL) of similar size can easily manoeuvre in this area.

The vehicle
The DF-41 vehicle has most advanced technologies incorporated for the smooth ride of the missile. It is an eight-axle, 16-wheeled TEL with possibly a six-axle drive.

The
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
of DF-41 TEL is very uniquely purposed to provide high-speed turning stability and smallest possible turning radius to the behemoth.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
has been provided on the three-front steer axles and the rear three drive axles are probably mechanically coordinated with hydraulic power. Thus making the DF-41 TEL very easily manoeuvrable.

As for the 27 May ICBM test from the Taiyuan Space Launch Centre, it was first reported by
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
quoting Pentagon spokesman Marine Corps Lt. Col. Christopher Logan who said, “The US was aware of recent flight tests and we continue to monitor weapons development in China.”

The well-known defence magazine
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
claimed that after the latest launch, DF-41 had moved closer to commissioning and deployment. Chinese experts claim that DF-41 is the most advanced ICBM in the world.
 

antiterror13

Brigadier
辽宁号总指挥长 says DF-41 officially entered service with the PLARF this month. This dude's main weibo account already got banned for leaking classified info once so he better delete this post lest this secondary account gets banned also.


dH3eAsP.png

so how many DF-41 in service now and how many is planned ?
 

Labrador

New Member
Registered Member
So, 24 DF-41 launchers? There are 20 DF-5A/B, at least 25 DF-31A.
How many DF-31AG launchers are in service? I assume at least 24?

That would be nearly a 100 10,000+ km ICBM. The deterrent is getting stronger by the day.

But according 1st pic here #2505Hendrik_2000, Wednesday at 4:55 PM if the base is finished 8 garages so 8 TELs by Brigade and a total of 16...
And i have 8 - 12 ICBMs for such unit infos from a very good member on CDF and in a report posted by SOC ( Sean O' Connor ) when he was active with its blog
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top