Would any real gaps on an aircraft design menifestly dominated by stealth considerations be visible at this distance with average resolution image?Does anyone know why the gaps of the rear weren't even symmetric.
Would any real gaps on an aircraft design menifestly dominated by stealth considerations be visible at this distance with average resolution image?Does anyone know why the gaps of the rear weren't even symmetric.
That they still cling to the idea that it isn't a fighter is nuts.
I know their inputs are barely worth sharing about, but the display of their gradual change of opinions on the J-36 is really something that is extremely humorous to watch.
Apart from the typical 'will it crash' shenanigans, they are now at the 'acceptance' stage of grief. They complement about it's a good looking aircraft and partially lazed their views on it being a bomber. Can't say the same for Sandboxx, but the trend of ridiculing the mainland's developments is clearly on the decline as we look into the future.
That they are fighter pilots is an even greater indictment of their views.Those guys are actual fighter pilots and they are also saying j36 is a medium bomber of some sort... the aircraft actually looks like a mini b2 if you think about it
Fighter pilots dont understand other aircraft? I figure they must at least understand other fighters... and its clear from the video they dont think the j36 is another fighterThat they are fighter pilots is an even greater indictment of their views.
A medieval European knight likely did not think a Mongol horseman being a proper cavalry, or thinks a morden tank is a chariot instead of cavalry. Outdated and too much pride.Those guys are actual fighter pilots and they are also saying j36 is a medium bomber of some sort... the aircraft actually looks like a mini b2 if you think about it