Chengdu next gen combat aircraft (?J-36) thread

AssassinsMace

Lieutenant General
It looks pretty good and modern now that there's a closer shot with no computer enhancements. Some of those early shots were not pretty. It looked like the surface was all crumpled and the DSI hump was too large. We need a frontal shot like with the J-20 when the wall climbers were at the start of the runway. The J-20 looked like a beast from that angle coming in for a landing.
 

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
It looks pretty good and modern now that there's a closer shot with no computer enhancements. Some of those early shots were not pretty. It looked like the surface was all crumpled and the DSI hump was too large. We need a frontal shot like with the J-20 when the wall climbers were at the start of the runway. The J-20 looked like a beast from that angle coming in for a landing.

Probably looks like Darth Vader’s helmet from the front.
 

CaribouTruth

Junior Member
Registered Member
No, but again … IMO it could be one but at the moment it is not transparent!
I understand your reservations, but it might be misguided to expect it to "look transparent". 5th Gen EOTS are "hanging" from the chin so to speak, so viewed from the side you can more or less see through the EOTS module.
The one on J-36's chine cannot be see through from the side, being embedded the side aspect will be "blocked in".
It will only be see through from the top-down aspect. Coatings might be applied to make it less transparent.

Speaking of alternatives, I saw a post by foolsball comparing the apertures to a snakes "infrared vision". 2 partially overlapping infrared sensors could be used to overcome the depth/vector shortcomings of a single IRST setup.
 

AndrewJ

Junior Member
Registered Member
I understand your reservations, but it might be misguided to expect it to "look transparent". 5th Gen EOTS are "hanging" from the chin so to speak, so viewed from the side you can more or less see through the EOTS module.
The one on J-36's chine cannot be see through from the side, being embedded the side aspect will be "blocked in".
It will only be see through from the top-down aspect. Coatings might be applied to make it less transparent.

Speaking of alternatives, I saw a post by foolsball comparing the apertures to a snakes "infrared vision". 2 partially overlapping infrared sensors could be used to overcome the depth/vector shortcomings of a single IRST setup.


The “pit” on either side of the cheek appear to be transparent, more like optical sensors than radar. It reminds me of a rattlesnake's infrared receiver.

1744080524594.png
 

Tiberium

Junior Member
Registered Member
Chengdu's facilities didn't end up near a populated are, the populated area grew until it ended up near them.
In 2009 I and one of my local friend went to CAC and the famous Huangtianba Airstrip, back then it was indeed a middle of nowhere and a very typical Sichuan suburb: fields around and nothing else. Along the runway it was a country lane only walled by a fence, you can definitely see through it and spot the aircraft. I think we spotted the J-10B prototype. Along the lane there were some 2 or 3-floor country tea houses, you actually can pay and go upstairs and sit back spotting planes and enjoy the day. I'm not sure if these places still exists.
How time flies.
 
Top