That was exactly my point. Since he is in the US or at least seek US protection, from the standpoint of the US he ISN'T a traitor.
That's like saying someone is not a war criminal if he stay in an country he haven't committed war crimes in.
That was exactly my point. Since he is in the US or at least seek US protection, from the standpoint of the US he ISN'T a traitor.
No, he would be a traitor from any standpoint. The only variable is whether you care about it or not. Non-Chinese might not care that he betrayed China, but most Chinese, including overseas Chinese, do.
Well as a non PRC citizen it does not bother me however I can totally understand a PRC citizen feeling the same way I would feel if say a US citizen betrays the US and is traitorous. That is logical.
What I don't understand is naturalized Americans who came from China or as you said overseas naturalized Chinese.... how do they feel about it?
That's like saying someone is not a war criminal if he stay in an country he haven't committed war crimes in.
Because historically, overseas Chinese have suffered persecution and discrimination because China was weak, therefore, most overseas Chinese have a vested interest in seeing China prosper and grow strong.
This is a interesting subject, so here is what I know.That was exactly my point. Since he is in the US or at least seek US protection, from the standpoint of the US he ISN'T a traitor.
This is a interesting subject, so here is what I know.
Your saying "from the standpoint of the US he ISN'T a traitor" may be shared by many Americans, I am not sure about that. But China and Chinese including American Chinese has and are brought up in Chinese culture. There is a culture difference, very significant one probably. A good example is not long ago.
At the turn of Ming and Qing dynasty (middle of 17th century), there was a high rank Ming official/general Hong Chengchou. He was the defense minister, military governor of Ming who was initially successful in defending Ming against the Manchu (before establishing Qing dynasty) attack, but eventually defeated and captured by Qing. He intended to commit suicide in prison by refusing food, but surrendered after the Qing's high regard and gratitude. Later he served Qing as defense minister, governor and adviser to the Qing emperors. But 110 years after his death when the Qing was composing book of "traitors of the late Ming" 明季贰臣传, he was put in it. The book says "for the principle of loyalty, he must be put in as a traitor (he is a traitor of his sovereign (Ming) regardless of his contribution to Qing)".
My example is to make an analog, Qing (US) was benefited by Hong (Ling)'s service, Hong (Ling) betrayed Ming (PRC) but Qing still see Hong as a traitor, a disgraced person (to be spitted on for this matter), while you (and US, or other Americans) do not care.
You see the difference? While Chinese Americans are American citizen first, but they have deep culture root in China, they are brought up with this idea by their parents. It is only natural for them to act/think in the way that solarz said. And act/think in that way does not make them less American, just like Qing act in that way did not stop Qing to quash the Ming remnant.
While I can not be sure about western culture as a whole on this kind of matter, but I know this matter is the most important about a person in Chinese culture. I am not implying which is right or better just as you are not arguing about it, but I find it quite interesting difference in the way of people's thinking and moral value, and I'd like to share my thought with you and others, this may help us to really understand each other in discussion in this forum.
Why would the chinese community spit on him in the US? not to get off topic but if you are an American citizen you should be loyal to the US not China.
Based on what data?1. In a Chinese Supermarket filled with Chinese people, are all/ most of them US citizens? I'd say 30-50% are.
Agreed. Ling is probably a traitor, just as Snowden is probably a traitor. I say probably in the legal sense, since they're innocent until proven guilty in the court of law. However, in the court of public opinion, both are traitors.2. Ling is a traitor, not a spy. He never intended to get Chinese information to the US; he intended to keep himself safe with the information. He's a traitor, who failed. From the US standpoint, he's still a traitor, but one that benefits the US. Traitors betray thier own country, and that's what he did. Traitors are looked down upon everywhere. No Americans would respect him, no matter how much he contributes to America, but they wouldn't attack him either because very few people are inclined to attack a pitiful cowering animal that begs you to protect it.
What a load of crap. If you're a US citizen, you're an American, regardless of your race or origin. Full stop. US already learned its shameful lessons from locking up Americans of Japanese ancestry in WW2, and it's extremely unlikely to repeat the mistake.3. As far as how American citizens of Chinese descent feel, well, that varies from person to person. To me, an orange is an orange. Even if it's labelled an apple, it's still an orange. And if it insists that it's an apple even though the skin peels off by hand and citrusy orange segments come out, it's just a confused, funny orange. If America and China go to war, the first people who go to internment camps would be them LOL
It may be to China's own advantage to study and then innovate for itself how America created the "melting pot" concept, grafted it into its DNA, because it's easier to keep the civilization-state unified if the Hans embrace the Tibetans, Uyghurs, Mongolians, and 52 other minorities China currently recognize as "Chinese."