Australia buying nuclear subs is like me selling my house for down payment on a five million dollar yacht moored somewhere off the coast of the Maldives.
YOLO...It is also sort of carbon emission reduction.Australia buying nuclear subs is like me selling my house for down payment on a five million dollar yacht moored somewhere off the coast of the Maldives.
CAATSA works wonders! The main adversary identified.“We intend to build these submarines in Adelaide"
"intend" is the correct word
And as a bonus, they make the French angry
There was (is?) also talk about having major assets stationed in Australia. With such an alliance announced, I wouldnt find it strange if Australia expanded its bases to accommodate more US and UK ships for sustained operationsWe'll have to wait and see whether UK and Australia will be significant security players in the Indo-Pacific region. We know UK has sent its carrier Queen Elizabeth all the way here to show flag and participate in exercises. It has also decided to leave two patrol boats in Japan permanently. We'll see if Australia will send its SSNs to fight in a Taiwan contingency as it promised, if and when it acquires them.
Overpriced? Really? It seem Australia was asking the impossible in relation to the subsLogical move by Australia to go SSN and ditch the overpriced SSKs. France is getting 6 SSNs for 10.5 billion dollars, but Australia was to pay 6 times as much for 12 conventional powered ones !?
They had already decided upon US made combat systems, and now that the US is willing to share its nuclear propulsion technology the French offer must've become even more unpalatable.
USNI take:
B-21...There was (is?) also talk about having major assets stationed in Australia. With such an alliance announced, I wouldnt find it strange if Australia expanded its bases to accommodate more US and UK ships for sustained operations
Australia buying nuclear subs is like me selling my house for down payment on a five million dollar yacht moored somewhere off the coast of the Maldives.