Thanks for your reply. For example, the confidence level of randomness in quantum fluctuations is beyond 5 SD, as inferred from numerous measurements verifying the Standard Model in particle physics. I am just wondering how bullet-proof the concept of randomness is, as applied to mutations and evolution, when the physical origins of this approximation seem to be unspecified and almost taken as default. Are the underlying mechanics, adiabatic, entropic, quantum,....... and thoroughly verified?
A group at Tampa FL, is also invoking evolution for cancer treatment.
Exploiting evolutionary principles to prolong tumor control in preclinical models of breast cancer
Pedro M. Enriquez-Navas1, Yoonseok Kam1, Tuhin Das1, Sabrina Hassan1, Ariosto Silva1, Parastou Foroutan1,*, Epifanio Ruiz1, Gary Martinez1,2, Susan Minton3, Robert J. Gillies1,4 and Robert A. Gatenby
Science Translational Medicine 24 Feb 2016: Vol. 8, Issue 327, pp. 327ra24
DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aad7842
"Conventional cancer treatment strategies assume that maximum patient benefit is achieved through maximum killing of tumor cells. However, by eliminating the therapy-sensitive population, this strategy accelerates emergence of resistant clones that proliferate unopposed by competitors—an evolutionary phenomenon termed “competitive release.” We present an evolution-guided treatment strategy designed to maintain a stable population of chemosensitive cells that limit proliferation of resistant clones by exploiting the fitness cost of the resistant phenotype"