Ask anything Thread

M

Michaelsinodef

Senior Member
Registered Member
Kirk said:
Unrelated but what is this Shilao podcast you guys already refer to? Can someone please drop a link? Thanks!
Click to expand...
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

It's in chinese as it's a podcast consisting of people from the Guancha news team (military commentators/journalists), they are pretty knowledgable when it comes to military matters, especially the PLA (and it's pretty say that they have insider sources within the PLA or know people who formerly were in the PLA).
 
M

monterrey

Just Hatched
Registered Member
Jeff Head said:
This thread is predominantly for new, inexperienced posters on SD. There will be one in each forum and the questions should relate to the overall topic of the forum in which it is located..

It is for true nubie or greenie questions that we do not want to clutter up our main threads with.

It is also for "off the wall," questions or suggestions, even from more experienced users on SD.

Our forum is very broad ranging and everyone cannot be experts on everything...so in one of the forums, if you have a legitimate question you have been afraid or embarrassed to ask...this is where you can do it.

As moderators see questions that may fit into these categories on other threads...they may well move them here to try and keep our more serious threads as professional as possible.

Be patient. Longer time members will watch these threads as will moderators...but it may take us a whole to get to some of these questions.

So...with that...carryon!
Click to expand...

Is it Possible to Apply Physically Newton's Third Law of Motion as a Dynamic Cycle System in a Motor Device in a + Positive Way?

3rd Thermodynamic Law Applicate in a Power-Plant Device. The Reaction at From of the Action. New Torque Power. It’s a simple Plus Formula of the Interaction of the Two Powers: 1/Action, + 2/Reaction = Retrodynamic. / For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. 2 Forces in 1 System.

RETRODYNAMIC Effect - Dextrogiro => vs <= Levogiro Phenomena Effect. / Rotor/RPM VS InFlow/Way. 2dn Thermodynamic Law Applicated in a Power-Plant Device. The Reaction at From of the Action. New Torque Power. Its a simple Pluse Formula of the Interaction of the Two Powers: 1/Accion, + 2/Reaction = Retrodynamic.

"Changing rotation inside a mass makes it possible to change its inertial properties. It is the equation for a jet motion without rejection of any mass.” Albert Einstein.

The logic of creation of an inertial propulsion system is thus: Any motion is rotation ---- Rotation of a matter generates a space-time Torsion ---Torsion of space - time is described by Ricci torsion --- Ricci torsion is an inertial field-----the rest mass of any object is determined by its inertial field---- operating by fields and forces of inertia inside of mass we can create inertial propulsion system which moves according to the equation [m (t) dv/dt =-vdm/dt].

Newton's Third Law of Motion: III. For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.

It is the sum of both (two) Forces - one to other / Are two Forces in one system.

The formula of the Retrodinamic effect is a simple mathematical summation. What is Dextrogiro plus Levogiro, gives the result of the sum, of what is the total, which is the retrodynamic effect. But keeps doing Exponential.

Retrodynamic Effect, are two Forces Actives in one system.

It's like when the Star Trek Enterprise Spaceship Accelerates into the depth of space but spinning 2Two Opposites Forces (Like the Ying-Yang Concept) on a Central Axis in a Rotary Manner Way.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

*

·RETRODYNAMIC Effect / Some Points of View:

I always explain it well, but another thing is that you don't understand it.

As if it were an everyday question.

And they don't take it as a disruption, which changes schemes.

Because they really wouldn't even know about it. Being a subject that nobody has ever really dealt with.

*

And also to you can see it as an encripted information.

And I know the best translator, for sure.

And they don't take it as a disruption, which changes schemes.

Because they really wouldn't even know about it. Being a subject that nobody has ever really dealt with.

But the concept it's a simple sum, then keep going to increase the phenomenal interaction.

Let me make a simple caparison: One Turn is One step, OK, Well in this particular case.

When you do One Turn is One Step, And Then is another turn are gone to be Two Steps.

And in the next turn are gone to be Four steps, And the next Turn are gone to be 8 Steps. Etc...

Really to to be able to explain it, needs to invent a new Mathematical Signal. Brand New.

I Tell You. Its Like That.

*

I'm going to explain them perfectly well. We are going to make a comparison that each turn of the Rotor (applied in my case/Gearturbine) is a Step. It's fine. And So now when the rotor rotates with the power of the mechanical drive (Action). And furthermore, it has the internal flow contrary to its rotation (Reaction), but in favor of the individual blade attached to the gear with planetary rotation that activates the Rotor. In such a case they are two forces in a single system.

*

Maybe it doesn't have the best translation, but that's something else, that's not the point. But that would in no way be something that could belittle his qualities and technical virtues. And at the end of the day, all the explanations you can have are in the operation of the system. And this could not be easier to appreciate, Summed up in a simple sum. And in this case of 2Two Forces: 1Action + 2Reaction Applied in a single cycle, and thus also a single system.

·A) 1Action VS/+ 2Reaction = ?

·B) 1DestroGiro VS/+ 2Levogiro = ?

·C)1Rotary Move VS/+ 2InFlow Way = ?

Note: ·I use the "VS" Because the dynamic interaction is front to front, that's why.

·And is Added force one to the other, that's why I use the Sume/Plus mathematical symbol.

·A, B, and C are the same situation with a different word, from a different, technical view.

Other Note: If somebody doesn't understand Cut be because of some reason. Not because my responsibility.

*

I deal with the Requirements of a new mathematical symbol, in order to explain the Retrodynamic Phenomenon that occurs in an invention that I am developing. It is called the "Retrodynamic Effect" and it is created by having a situation of an axis turning in the opposite direction in a rotating system and in this way a great force is created. And there is currently no mathematical symbol that can explain it.
 
M

monterrey

Just Hatched
Registered Member
monterrey said:
Is it Possible to Apply Physically Newton's Third Law of Motion as a Dynamic Cycle System in a Motor Device in a + Positive Way?

3rd Thermodynamic Law Applicate in a Power-Plant Device. The Reaction at From of the Action. New Torque Power. It’s a simple Plus Formula of the Interaction of the Two Powers: 1/Action, + 2/Reaction = Retrodynamic. / For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. 2 Forces in 1 System.

RETRODYNAMIC Effect - Dextrogiro => vs <= Levogiro Phenomena Effect. / Rotor/RPM VS InFlow/Way. 2dn Thermodynamic Law Applicated in a Power-Plant Device. The Reaction at From of the Action. New Torque Power. Its a simple Pluse Formula of the Interaction of the Two Powers: 1/Accion, + 2/Reaction = Retrodynamic.

"Changing rotation inside a mass makes it possible to change its inertial properties. It is the equation for a jet motion without rejection of any mass.” Albert Einstein.

The logic of creation of an inertial propulsion system is thus: Any motion is rotation ---- Rotation of a matter generates a space-time Torsion ---Torsion of space - time is described by Ricci torsion --- Ricci torsion is an inertial field-----the rest mass of any object is determined by its inertial field---- operating by fields and forces of inertia inside of mass we can create inertial propulsion system which moves according to the equation [m (t) dv/dt =-vdm/dt].

Newton's Third Law of Motion: III. For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.

It is the sum of both (two) Forces - one to other / Are two Forces in one system.

The formula of the Retrodinamic effect is a simple mathematical summation. What is Dextrogiro plus Levogiro, gives the result of the sum, of what is the total, which is the retrodynamic effect. But keeps doing Exponential.

Retrodynamic Effect, are two Forces Actives in one system.

It's like when the Star Trek Enterprise Spaceship Accelerates into the depth of space but spinning 2Two Opposites Forces (Like the Ying-Yang Concept) on a Central Axis in a Rotary Manner Way.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

*

·RETRODYNAMIC Effect / Some Points of View:

I always explain it well, but another thing is that you don't understand it.

As if it were an everyday question.

And they don't take it as a disruption, which changes schemes.

Because they really wouldn't even know about it. Being a subject that nobody has ever really dealt with.

*

And also to you can see it as an encripted information.

And I know the best translator, for sure.

And they don't take it as a disruption, which changes schemes.

Because they really wouldn't even know about it. Being a subject that nobody has ever really dealt with.

But the concept it's a simple sum, then keep going to increase the phenomenal interaction.

Let me make a simple caparison: One Turn is One step, OK, Well in this particular case.

When you do One Turn is One Step, And Then is another turn are gone to be Two Steps.

And in the next turn are gone to be Four steps, And the next Turn are gone to be 8 Steps. Etc...

Really to to be able to explain it, needs to invent a new Mathematical Signal. Brand New.

I Tell You. Its Like That.

*

I'm going to explain them perfectly well. We are going to make a comparison that each turn of the Rotor (applied in my case/Gearturbine) is a Step. It's fine. And So now when the rotor rotates with the power of the mechanical drive (Action). And furthermore, it has the internal flow contrary to its rotation (Reaction), but in favor of the individual blade attached to the gear with planetary rotation that activates the Rotor. In such a case they are two forces in a single system.

*

Maybe it doesn't have the best translation, but that's something else, that's not the point. But that would in no way be something that could belittle his qualities and technical virtues. And at the end of the day, all the explanations you can have are in the operation of the system. And this could not be easier to appreciate, Summed up in a simple sum. And in this case of 2Two Forces: 1Action + 2Reaction Applied in a single cycle, and thus also a single system.

·A) 1Action VS/+ 2Reaction = ?

·B) 1DestroGiro VS/+ 2Levogiro = ?

·C)1Rotary Move VS/+ 2InFlow Way = ?

Note: ·I use the "VS" Because the dynamic interaction is front to front, that's why.

·And is Added force one to the other, that's why I use the Sume/Plus mathematical symbol.

·A, B, and C are the same situation with a different word, from a different, technical view.

Other Note: If somebody doesn't understand Cut be because of some reason. Not because my responsibility.

*

I deal with the Requirements of a new mathematical symbol, in order to explain the Retrodynamic Phenomenon that occurs in an invention that I am developing. It is called the "Retrodynamic Effect" and it is created by having a situation of an axis turning in the opposite direction in a rotating system and in this way a great force is created. And there is currently no mathematical symbol that can explain it.
Click to expand...
Gearturbine Retrodynamic.jpgGearturbine Retrodynamic Effect Draw.jpgGearturbine Retrodynamic Inside Rotor View.jpg
 
L

latenlazy

Brigadier
Patchwork_Chimera said:
Yeah. Unfortunately, we have generally harbored much more negative, chauvinistic views towards unfamiliar nations and cultures.

Possessing colonial-era European cultural roots - which themselves grew in soil made from centuries of religious, class, ethnic, and nationalist in-group/out-group polarization and conflict - that were fertilized further through the "Indian Wars," and our nation's uncharacteristically kaleidoscopic ethnic demography, especially when compared to European nations. Those factors, and their influence on social, societal, educational, political, and other norms and standards, have molded us into a population far more sensitized to "in group" and "out group" traits than most other nations and culture groups, be they ethnic, class, occupational, religious, or national differences we may have.

Thus, when our citizens see portrayals of - for example - another nationality, or learn about that nation in our school system, or even when they hear a general characterization of their citizens, mischaracterized and laden with stereotypes or not - we are much more likely to internalize and construct our own mental image of those "out-groups" from all of those inaccurate depictions and impressions. Even when it's something demeaning, American citizens are generally far less likely to think critically about information pertaining to an "out-group," because the sheer fact that they *are* an "out-group," often blinds an individual to common sense, which is replaced by a notion of "well they're not like me, so I can't apply my own sense of what seems reasonable to them (even when one obviously ought to)." This manifested especially sharply in the 60s, during school integration, where white and black kids alike would often end up asking eachother ridiculous questions, like whether or not they would do commonplace things like use toothbrushes, eat simple and obvious types of food (stuff like apples), and other various "no duh" shouldn't-even-need-to-asks. That quite well depicts the level of "even though "they" may live literally a couple blocks from "us", work in the next building over from "us", be just as human as "us", need the same essentials as "us", and more - the fact that there's even a "them" and "us" to begin with, meant that "they"/the "out-group"/the "others"/the ones "not like us" may as well be aliens for all "we" know" that formed the foundation of our intercultural beliefs even up into the late 20th century.

It's that sorta crap that led to people asking you if you ate dogs, or came over to seek freedom, or if you're a communist. The deeply unfortunate inability to see beyond the stratifying traits, and to instead let all the misconceptions, stereotypes, incorrect depictions, etc. pile up and form the "knowledge" people think they have about new groups of people. While I'm sure it doesn't mean a whole lot, I do want to apologize on behalf of the midwits who pestered you with that nonsense.
Click to expand...
I'm guessing you read Edward Said here lol.
 
L

latenlazy

Brigadier
Patchwork_Chimera said:
Nope, never heard of him/it (if that's the title of the book). Like I said, I detest politics nowadays, so I try to distance myself from it as much as possible. As such, if it's a politically-oriented book, I'm unlikely to have read it.
Click to expand...
Nah it's academic lit. The guy who wrote the critical theory book on Orientalism. Though I guess maybe that can qualify as political.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top