I believe it's;
Ek is Kinetic energy
m is mass
v is velocity
The sum will be given in joules.
But do indulge me and guide me through your reasoning one more time.
If you are talking about the amount of energy delivered by the projectile you need to calculate the amount the projectile was traveling multiplying by mass ...
1) The above statement of yours translates into
Ek = Amount the projectile was traveling * Mass, with 'Ek' being the Kinetic Energy (in a classical mechanical system), and '
*' being the multiplication sign.
2) You subsequently defined the "amount the projectile was traveling" as
"Velocity", which shall be represented by 'v'.
Now, substituting 'v' for "amount the projectile was traveling" in 1), I get
Ek=v*m, or the equivalent
Ek=m*v, with 'v' being velocity, and 'm' being mass.
3) BUT,
you then stated that
Ek=(m*v^2)/2, or the equivalent
Ek= (m*v*v)/2.
So a pertinent question now arises: do you believe your own formulation in 2), which is
Ek=m*v, or do you believe in the formulation in 3), which is
Ek= (m*v*v)/2? Which do you believe to be true? Or do you believe BOTH to be true? If BOTH, then might you enlighten us as to how
Ek=m*v is, in your esteemed estimation, equal to
(m*v*v)/2?
Or are you perhaps foreshadowing a kamikaze solution in lieu of a mathematical one?