American Economics Thread

MortyandRick

Senior Member
Registered Member
Averages are only “uneven” if the underlying distribution has an underlying skewness. There is nothing inherent about gdppc that necessitates inequality
There is uneven distribution with the lower 50% of the population ones less than 10% of US wealth. And the difference is getting larger. And that of course skews gdppc.

Healthcare spending is highly concentrated in a few people - the top 1% of individuals are responsible for 50% of the costs (
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
), it doesn’t make sense that healthcare delivery is the main driver of population health metrics like life expectancy. Instead - US healthcare delivery is one of the best in the world in terms of speed and efficacy (as previously discussed on both the time to MRI or evidenced by foreigners flocking to the U.S.

Wrong. US isn't even in the top 10

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

- and all for the low low price of <1% of the median US wage) but the U.S. public dies disproportionately young from diseases of mass affluence such as obesity and car accidents.
Wrong, Average America spends almost 50% more on health care than other OECD countries with lower results to show for it.

It makes perfect sense that quality is measure by life expectancy not by revenue. Health care is a right and it's job is to make the population healthier and the US health care is not doing its primary job.

It's not best when you use metric that counts, such as quality of life, life expectancy, childhood mortality. In many parts of the US, childhood mortality rivals third world countries. That's a failure of the medical system.

The cost is enormous for such bad results. Giving birth can cost up to 80k. People flock to Canada to buy drugs which are often times 3 times cheaper for the same drug. So many Americans were coming over the border that Canada had to thing about not selling to them since they were taking up Canadian supply.


The primary drivers of price level differences between countries are due to differences in productivity levels between countries (more productive firms can offer higher wages so less productive firms, in order to keep employees will raise prices and wages accordingly - this is the primary driver of how development works - as Baumol uncovered).
No, it's supply and demand and there is a lack of supply so companies are demanding more cost. It's pricing gauging.
 

CMP

Senior Member
Registered Member
Are most of the new ones used to pay the interest?
IIRC 74 cents of each 1 dollar in tax revenue now goes to paying interest. So any new debt is still purely for spending. Things probably aren't going to go completely insane until all tax revenue is for paying interest and some portion of the new debt is also for paying interest. At this rate, I think we should probably see that within 5-10 years.
 

9dashline

Captain
Registered Member
Doesn't have to be big oil. Any industry if you work your way up to the top 1%, it's a big pay out. Those secretaries certainly don't make 200-300k a year. Buddy in pharmacy worked her butt off for 10+ years, bought the pharmacy for $5M. Once she pays that off, can easily make $1M a year. Also know a few doctors.

Got a friend that worked as a roofer (build roofs for houses). Started his own company a few years ago and guy makes $1M a month and is expanding. He is literally one of two companies that can do some special roof in all western Canada. Dumb as nails growing up, but he works hard. Now is probably the 2nd richest is my group of friends.
By definition, 99% of folks cannot work their way up to the 1%

Its not a scaleable solution...

Like hoping to win the lottery or become a celebrity....
 
Top