American Economics Thread

Abominable

Major
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Stagflation is an economic cycle characterized by slow
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
and a high unemployment rate accompanied by inflation. Economic policymakers find this combination particularly difficult to handle, as attempting to correct one of the factors can exacerbate another.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

In
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, stagflation or recession-inflation is a situation in which the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
is high or increasing, the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
rate slows, and
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
remains steadily high.
It presents a dilemma for
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, since actions intended to lower inflation may exacerbate unemployment.
Makes a dumb economic point, then posts an article that contradicts the point he was making.

Carries on making the same point.


Tell us sleepy, are you really from an an ex-Soviet country? Life must have been very hard in Kerplakestan for you to devote your life to spamming economics topics on an obscure Chinese economic forum.
 

GodRektsNoobs

Junior Member
Registered Member
I literally look at the receipts and give you the numbers and you still insist it's an exaggeration. $6 and $8 eggs are an exaggeration? How about you try looking up the average egg prices in New York? You'll find it's not far off. Not to mention you're so focused on the exact price that you fail to notice I gave a pre and post price for a reason - to give an indication of the trend. Those exact prices will not be present across the entire country, but the trend is still there.

Imagine being so arrogant as to tell people that their lived experiences aren't true. So fuck off and let's stop talking with each other anymore Sleepy.
Just came back from Costco. 3 pieces of steak for $80. If this isn't inflation I don't know what is. This is from Canada, but I doubt US would be much far off.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20230202_160808.jpg
    IMG_20230202_160808.jpg
    270.7 KB · Views: 41

HighGround

Senior Member
Registered Member
Makes a dumb economic point, then posts an article that contradicts the point he was making.

Carries on making the same point.


Tell us sleepy, are you really from an an ex-Soviet country? Life must have been very hard in Kerplakestan for you to devote your life to spamming economics topics on an obscure Chinese economic forum.
What economic point was I making, that you found dumb?
 

KYli

Brigadier
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Stagflation is an economic cycle characterized by slow
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
and a high unemployment rate accompanied by inflation. Economic policymakers find this combination particularly difficult to handle, as attempting to correct one of the factors can exacerbate another.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

In
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, stagflation or recession-inflation is a situation in which the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
is high or increasing, the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
rate slows, and
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
remains steadily high.
It presents a dilemma for
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, since actions intended to lower inflation may exacerbate unemployment.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

…however, many Western countries experienced “stagflation,” or simultaneous high unemployment and inflation, a phenomenon that contradicted Keynes’s view. The result was a revival of classical liberalism, also known as “neoliberalism,” which became the cornerstone of economic policy in the United States under President Ronald Reagan (1981–89) and in the United…

Here is the official Oxford Dictionary of Economic Terms. Pretty much as authoritative as you can get.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

The situation where a country persistently suffers from both high inflation and high unemployment.

I don't why you keep arguing, you can't even accept the commonly understood definition of a relatively well-known term.
Stagflation, Stagnant growth and inflation. Stagflation in its strictest term is high inflation coupled with stagnant of growth and rising unemployment. Unemployment is a lagging indicator. As higher prices cause demand to drop, and as the demands drop the need of labor decrease. As a result there is a decrease in both supply and demand, consequently both inflation and unemployment would go up.

In the 70s and 80s, the economy officially entered stagflation in 1974 and ended in 1984. Core inflation in 1973 increased from 3.6% to 8.3% in 1974. Unemployment increased from 5.6% in 1974 to 8.5% in 1975. Unemployment has always been the lagging indicator. The Fed believes they could manage a soft landing but I disagree.

My stance has always been that due to the Fed is soft and weak just like they were in 2021 and early 2022 by calling inflation is transitory. The recent increase in the interest rate would not be enough break the inflation in the long run as inflation would return next year but unemployment would also rise. Therefore, we have stagflation.

I'm not going to argue with you or Cambridge. I don't need to. You're simply wrong.
Whatever.
Okay? And how is 0.3% not a massive drop from 1%+ inflation we were seeing earlier?
Because the US is not in a hyperinflation like Argentina or Turkey. US only has high inflation or stagflation which doesn't mean inflation would constantly go up and up. If inflation is increasing 1% each month from previous month, then it is a definition of hyperinflation.
The Fed claimed that the inflation is transitory in early 2021. The first rate hike by the Fed was taken in March of 2022. I don't know where you're getting this ridiculous argument from, I never said high inflation was fine. All I did was point out that you were factually wrong. Inflation was high in 2021, but higher in early 2022, before it fell off a cliff in 2022. The War in Ukraine did have inflationary effects, which you are trying to brush off without any data backing you up.
I don't know why you keep downplaying the Fed and the administration's responsibilities for not taking actions earlier as there are plenty of signs of overheating in the economy due to the trillions pumping in the economy and the zero interest rate. They keep talking about inflation is transitory and they fucked up. Don't try to excuse them for their failures and the messes that they created.

Another attempt to put words in my mouth. I never said Ukraine conflict didn't play a role in inflation. I said that inflation is increase at faster in 2022 than 2021 and with or without Ukraine conflict, the US is having high inflation. That is a fact. I don't need to provide any data because that is a fact. unless you are telling me that 2022 inflation is not higher than 2021.
That's not monthly inflation. That's 1 YoY inflation aggregated over 12 months. MtM inflation is completely different.
So what, people talk about and compare inflation from the year before not from the month before. Inflation increased from 1.4% annually to 7% annually. That is a fact.
Lol. I didn't move the goal posts. There are literal screen shots where what you claimed, was completely different from the actual reported numbers.
I didn't see any. You just pick and choose irrelevant data and move goal post to continue your nonsense but never answer anything directly.
Uh no. What I disagreed with was your assertion that an interest raise of 0.5% was "soft". I also pointed out that the stagflation itself was not as painful, as the "cure" that stopped inflation. A deep 2 year recession that resulted in higher unemployment.
That is just your opinion.

You started digging the hole deeper by claiming that "the US growth is very slow and the inflation is very high," which was factually wrong.
U.S. inflation largely stopped growing Month-to-Month in the last 3-6 months of 2022. When I presented you the numbers, you started claiming that the numbers are only good because of gas volatility. When I pointed out that even if we took the gas out, we still have 0.2% inflation (or 0.3% a 0.1% different isn't making or breaking the argument here), you started moving the goal posts in your argument.
How much is the US growing right now and you think 6.5% inflation is considered fine. Do you know the Fed has obligation to keep inflation at 2%.
If you actually paid attention to my posts, we wouldn't be having a problem, but I suppose because your credibility or whatever, is "on the line" you're insisting on trying to play a stupid game of gotcha instead of simply agreeing with my accurate assessment of the economy, or simply discussing a more relevant data point in a more civilized and productive manner.
Moving goal post, posting irrelevant data of month to month by dismissing and ignoring any contrary data or annual data, insisting 6.5% is mission accomplished. I don't see why you have the audacity to claim your assessment is accurate.
Uh no. That's not what the article says.

Specifically, the article notes that rent prices actually fell dramatically in November 2020 to their lowest point in 10 years. Because of that, the "Some New York renters who signed leases when rents were at their lowest saw 30 or 40 percent increases at the end of 2021."

The data source they used for the article, provides the data for all of us for free.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

View attachment 106469
What is your point? Again trying to move the goal post. From the lowest point to the highest point there is 60% increase in rent. And these data is average. You think every landlords increase and decrease rent like the graph. That is why I keep saying you don't live in the real world. Some people got their rent increase 50% or even double but others might not get increase much.
Your own data sources don't support your conclusions.
Whatever make you feel better sleepystudent.
 

HighGround

Senior Member
Registered Member
Stagflation, Stagnant growth and inflation. Stagflation in its strictest term is high inflation coupled with stagnant of growth and rising unemployment. Unemployment is a lagging indicator. As higher prices cause demand to drop, and as the demands drop the need of labor decrease. As a result there is a decrease in both supply and demand, consequently both inflation and unemployment would go up.

In the 70s and 80s, the economy officially entered stagflation in 1974 and ended in 1984. Core inflation in 1973 increased from 3.6% to 8.3% in 1974. Unemployment increased from 5.6% in 1974 to 8.5% in 1975. Unemployment has always been the lagging indicator. The Fed believes they could manage a soft landing but I disagree.
I'm glad you finally conceded that stagflation does indeed require a period of high unemployment.

My stance has always been that due to the Fed is soft and weak just like they were in 2021 and early 2022 by calling inflation is transitory. The recent increase in the interest rate would not be enough break the inflation in the long run as inflation would return next year but unemployment would also rise. Therefore, we have stagflation.

Good, I'm glad you're making finally starting to make an argument that makes sense. To that end, no. I don't believe that a 0.5% rise in interest rates is soft whatsoever, especially when MtM data indicates that inflation has virtually stopped. Should inflation data next month indicate that there is once again an up-tick in inflation, the Fed can raise interest rates yet again by 0.75% instead of 0.5%.

Whatever.

Lol you did concede. So yeah. Whatever.
Because the US is not in a hyperinflation like Argentina or Turkey. US only has high inflation or stagflation which doesn't mean inflation would constantly go up and up. If inflation is increasing 1% each month from previous month, then it is a definition of hyperinflation.
Inflation was increasing nearly 1% per month. The only technical definition of hyperinflation I can find, is when the inflation rate exceeds over 50% per month.
I don't know why you keep downplaying the Fed and the administration's responsibilities for not taking actions earlier as there are plenty of signs of overheating in the economy due to the trillions pumping in the economy and the zero interest rate. They keep talking about inflation is transitory and they fucked up. Don't try to excuse them for their failures and the messes that they created.

Another attempt to put words in my mouth. I never said Ukraine conflict didn't play a role in inflation. I said that inflation is increase at faster in 2022 than 2021 and with or without Ukraine conflict, the US is having high inflation. That is a fact. I don't need to provide any data because that is a fact. unless you are telling me that 2022 inflation is not higher than 2021.

I wasn't downplaying anything. That's merely the impression you got, because I pointed out the exact numbers, which were inconsistent with your representation of the situation.

Furthermore, you do need to prove your "facts". Especially when they are being contested. Which is exactly what I did. Now to be fair, this most recent post of yours, is significantly better on the historical record.

So what, people talk about and compare inflation from the year before not from the month before. Inflation increased from 1.4% annually to 7% annually. That is a fact.

Yeah, people aren't particularly intelligent on this issue. In order to see whether the Fed is making progress on inflation, we have to look at MtM inflation numbers, not YoY. That's how we can determine if it is getting worse or better.

I didn't see any. You just pick and choose irrelevant data and move goal post to continue your nonsense but never answer anything directly.

You're the person who keep spouting random nonsense, and then gets mad when it gets disproven by data.

I didn't bring up chicken or eggs. You did.

I didn't bring up rental prices, you did.

All I did, was call out the ridiculous hyperbole that people are spitting, because they want to be upset.

I never said inflation wasn't high, or that high inflation was okay. All I said was that it's nowhere near as bad as the numbers people are suggesting.

That's about as direct as you can get.

That is just your opinion.
Uh yes. Yes it is just my opinion. I never asserted it as fact.
How much is the US growing right now and you think 6.5% inflation is considered fine. Do you know the Fed has obligation to keep inflation at 2%.

I think that MtM inflation of -0.1% for December is fine. The noose is still being tightened by raising the rate by yet another 0.5%, because it's better to be safe and continue monetary tightening. I don't think it's somehow "soft" to still raise rates. No. I think it would be incredibly destructive to raise rates without any regard for the economic ramifications and it's better to go for a soft landing.

Why? Because a recession is destructive. It hurts workers. And the very people I chastise for their ridiculous "my expenses have doubled" stories, will face much more serious ruin when many of them lose their jobs, when they lose their businesses, when their homes are repossessed. I consider that to be one of the worst possible scenarios.

So no. The 0.5% raise in interest rates is fine and the Fed is continuin its battle against inflation. Responsibly.

Moving goal post, posting irrelevant data of month to month by dismissing and ignoring any contrary data or annual data, insisting 6.5% is mission accomplished. I don't see why you have the audacity to claim your assessment is accurate.

It's not irrelevant. It's up-to-date information that should be informing our decision. Lol.
What is your point? Again trying to move the goal post. From the lowest point to the highest point there is 60% increase in rent. And these data is average. You think every landlords increase and decrease rent like the graph. That is why I keep saying you don't live in the real world. Some people got their rent increase 50% or even double but others might not get increase much.

What goalposts? For a dozen posts now, you've insisted that rental prices have doubled. The very article you provided as evidence, explicitly noted that prices didn't double or increase by 50%.

What happened, was that prices actually fell and then recovered. Rental prices have increased by a lot, but the actual number isn't close to 50%. It's around 20% (at best) from pre-pandemic to now.

I even noted that perhaps there may be some lone, anecdotal evidence (some people have very low or no rent thanks to connections or crazy deals), but as a rule, rents did not increase by 50%. Your own NYT article you posted corroborated that, and so did the resource they referenced, some kind of apartment rent data tracker.

If were actually more accurate, rent prices in most cases increased under 20%, not even the full 20%.

But yeah man, my data shows that your own data shows that. But because you know somebody who claims that their rent increased by 50%, somehow that means everyone's rent costs have doubled.

Whatever make you feel better sleepystudent.

Lol okay. You can ask the mods to verify my identity, because I have no idea who you guys are whinging about. But you guys are haunted by some sort of spectre, that I am unaware of. He must've owned you incredibly hard if you're still crying about it after he left.
 
Top