So the petroleum removed from the Strategic Reserve counts as exports?Interesting that you don't include the caveat:
The Biden administration has boosted petroleum exports from their strategic reserves to keep prices down and boost GDP numbers for midterms. Otherwise their GDP growth would be negative.
Indeed, goods and services and of goods, petroleum takes a large portion but doesn't dominate. US GDP would have grown in 3Q22 with or without SPR activityThe increase in exports reflected increases in both goods and services. Within exports of goods, the leading contributors to the increase were industrial supplies and materials (notably petroleum and products as well as other nondurable goods), and nonautomotive capital goods.
Petroluem removed the Strategic Petroleum Reserve doesn't count in GDP since that would be double counting.So the petroleum removed from the Strategic Reserve counts as exports?
Then there is this finance jihadist and his bad takesHarbinger of a recession - China should buy more gold anyway.
Interesting video on the global (not just China) UST sell -off and where it might lead:Then there is this finance jihadist and his bad takes
Kyle Bass lost his pants by betting against Hong Kong Dollar and RMB, so he will never miss any opportunity to badmouth China's economy and currency. What he neglects to mention is that China has the most foreign exchange reserves in the world by far, even without counting Hong Kong's reserves, which is the world's 6th largest, as I pointed out in the Chinese Economics Thread yesterday:Then there is this finance jihadist and his bad takes
BTW, China has by far the most foreign exchange reserves in the world, despite the discrepancy between Trading Economics and Statista. Notice that Hong Kong has the world's 6th largest foreign exchange reserves, more than South Korea.
Corporate profits have contributed disproportionately to inflation. How should policymakers respond?