it's been some time (I know I posted it a few times before), and will need to wait some more to see;
"just not to forget
Apr 2, 2015
https://www.sinodefenceforum.com/aircraft-carriers-ii-closed-to-posting.t3125/page-534#post-334315
the assertion (not mine, but it doesn't matter) was the Fords had too short deck in the sense
aircraft would be so heavy (assuming enough ordnance/fuel) they would need rather high takeoff speed, and the shorter the deck, the higher acceleration to achieve that takeoff speed
(the argument was related to suggesting either too low ordnance/fuel, or too high force needed, with obvious drawbacks)"