timepass
Brigadier
American Fighter Jet - F 35 Lightning 2 | U.S. Navy's F-35B loaded on Aircraft Carrier | Helmet Mounted Display System Revealed . . .
Just to be clear, you are talking about the USS Gerald Ford aren't you? People in glass houses etc....below is the link to
I have to go, so I jumped to the last paragraph where I can see
"Instead it is disappointing to see journalists persist with the ‘carriers with no planes’ rubbish, because it is patently untrue."
l think the author would need to show some F-35s on board instead LOL!
EDIT I'm briefly back: a supercarrier with an empty deck HALF A YEAR SINCE COMMISSIONING looks pathetic, it's P-A-T-H-E-T-I-C that's what I'm telling you from the middle of Europe
if you're teasing, it's funny, but you know the Ford has operated some Hornets for exampleJust to be clear, you are talking about the USS Gerald Ford aren't you? ...
the view from the most recent VIDEO: Flight Operations on USS Gerald R. Ford
'No combat value' sorry, gotta call BS on that one. She could be pressed into service right now in the LPH role if required, we have 'form' on this (1982 HMS Illustrious sea trials were compressed into two weeks so she could be sent south to relieve Invincible. She wasn't properly 'Commissioned' until spring 83). She has combat value, she just hasn't been able to fully realise her potential yet. This process is deliberately being held to a snail's pace for financial reasons (as always), and should the appropriate emergency arise, things will move a lot faster.if you're teasing, it's funny, but you know the Ford has operated some Hornets for example
Nov 8, 2017
It was meant to be somewhat light hearted, but to be fair the Ford has not embarked a full air wing and is far from combat ready, so she is realistically on a par with Big Liz.
as for the QE, it looks like a poor coordination of the involved projects (ship/F-35), or worse
As I said the plan was to operate the Harrier force from her deck in the interim, but stupid politicians got in the way. We even slowed the build of the QECs so the gap between their service entry and the F-35Bs wouldn't be that great.
anyway the ship has been inducted into the RN, while she has no combat value now
(personally I'm saddened by this situation)
I know the reasons for the patterns, it just occurred to me grey can get a bit boring...Obi, Those patterns had a reason way back when today not so much. You see some ships in the Littoral combat ( patrol boats, Corvetts, cutters, missile boats and frigates) use a set of camo patterns but those are in Littoral.
IF the US did it It would be alot less.... busy then the Pattern above.I know the reasons for the patterns, it just occurred to me grey can get a bit boring...
C'mon, anyone want to see a Nimitz in a dazzle pattern?
Bit of an oddity here, a picture freely admitted to be photoshopped but produced as a result of a schools history project: Big Liz in WW1 'Dazzle' Camouflage:View attachment 47441 From a personal and aesthetic point of view, would anyone here like to see the return of big bold camo patterns?