Miragedriver
Brigadier
It is becoming increasingly more perilous to be a fighter pilot in the current electronic warfare environment. Especially in an older aircraft.
source is the one popular here:It has emerged that divers inspecting the hull of the HMS Queen Elizabeth discovered that the top coat of paint had failed to adhere properly.
A Royal Navy spokesperson said:
“There are areas of the hull of HMS Queen Elizabeth where the top-coat of paint has not adhered to the undercoat.
We have worked with our suppliers to find out the reasons why and are putting in place a process to bring this to the right standard ahead of sea trials.”
It came to light earlier in the month that HMS Queen Elizabeth will now sail for sea trials in Summer instead of Spring as previously expected.
The news of the slip started to pick up traction when Former shadow Defence Minister Kevan Jones MP enquired in Parliament about sea trials being moved back from Spring to Summer:
“In the 2015 SDSR and again in December of last year, in the first annual report of the SDSR, the government were very clear that the sea trials for HMS Queen Elizabeth would begin in spring of this year.
In response to a parliamentary question last week, she informed me that they would no longer take place, but would take place in summer of this year. What are the reasons for this, and what is going to be the operational service date for Queen Elizabeth?”
Parliamentary Under Secretary at the Ministry of Defence Harriet Baldwin said:
“I would just like to confirm to him that she will commence her sea trials this Summer, and she will enter into the same programme so that she can sail into Portsmouth later this year.”
Defence secretary Michael Fallon said:
“It has always been our intention that Queen Elizabeth should be accepted into the Royal Navy before the end of this year. We are not giving specific dates as to when the sea trials are likely to commence.
The Queen Elizabeth will set out on those sea trials when she is ready to do so.”
Defence Procurement Minister Harriett Baldwin faced the Commons Defence Committee today, she was asked Madeleine Moon what was behind the delay and responded by saying:
“The carrier is due in Portsmouth this year but what I can’t give the committee is the specific days of the week. By the very definition of what you’re going through when you’re going through trials is that you’re potentially in that trial process have to make some corrections to something, that’s the whole point of a trial.”
The minister added that the crew was ready.
@Air Force Brat
There is njo doubt in my mind that the Crows nest, mounted on the Merlin, will be as absolutely good as a Helo AEW capability can get.
I still believe they can mount more electroincs and a stronger capability on an Osprey, presuurize it and have t go higher than the Merlin.
But, that is just my opinion...but one based he service ceiling being 15,000 ft for a Merlin, and 25,000 feet for the Osprey, and based on the weight each can carry, I believe strongly that an Osprey AEW aircraft would be a stronger choice.
But there isn't one...and the decision is made and there will be a Merlin AEW HM2.
And Lockheed is the prime for the bringing together of the radar/electronics for the HMs and they most definitely will produce a very strong capability.
" Lockheed Martin as Prime Contractor, is responsible for the overall design and development of the CROWSNEST system, which incorporates an improved version of the existing Thales Searchwater radar and Cerberus Mission System onto the Merlin HM Mk2 helicopter fleet, producing ten role fit kits and full fleet modification to ensure that this key Royal Navy capability is delivered. CROWSNEST will be integrated onto the existing Mk2 Merlin platform ensuring the current capability is maintained."
Just the same, it is always better to get that, or ne that s as good or better up 10,000 feet higher. And the Opsrey would provide that or more...because if the US developed it for their LHDs and LHAs, I be dollars to doughnuts you'd see it with a 30,000+ foot ceiling.
The ceiling for the Hawkeye is listed as 35,000 ft, but I have it on good authority that they can and do get up to 40,000 feet.
A [pressurized Opsrey, made for AEW, operting at 30,000 feet, would be an awesome bird that anyone with a STOVL carrier would want...except our English brothers who are going to be in completely for the Crowsnest....but you never know what might happen ten years from now if we would just do it.Thank you Jeff, I would have never guessed the Hawkeye as a high-altitude chick, although I know even the C-130 can get into the 40's given enough time. I also didn't realize the Osprey wasn't pressurized and that could be done, but its likely simpler to operate it at lower altitudes??
Absolutey 100% amen to every bit of what you siad my ffriend.Another key point to remember about AEW aircraft and the F-35 is that the enemy will be able to detect the emissions from the AEW Radar, but cannot do anything about it as the aircraft will be beyond their reach. Meanwhile the Lightnings will be able to utilise all the information from that AEW Bird without emitting anything themselves, remaining unseen b the enemy. The F-35s radar is very impressive, but why tell the enemy where you are if you don't have to?
In a similar vein, one of the benefits of carrier's having AEW is they can remain in EMCON and rely on the 'eye in the sky' to provide them with a full radar picture of the combat zone whilst keeping themselves safely silent. The enemy will already have worked out there is a carrier group somewhere out there, and they will know there is an AEW aircraft watching them, but beyond that they will not have a fix on the carrier group's location nearer than a few hundred miles, and for targeting purposes that just isn't anywhere near good enough. The Argentines knew our carriers where somewhere to the east of the Falklands in 1982, but never successfully found the carriers themselves. And we were lacking AEW at the time!
was now, insideincludes an amphibious assault ship carrying 16 to 20 F-35Bs with four MV-22 Ospreys to refuel them – along with relying on the Distributed Aviation Operations’ forward-operating bases – and deploying either independently, as part of an Expeditionary Strike Group or as part of a Carrier Strike Group with a Navy aircraft carrier and guided-missile cruisers and destroyers
The Paint problem has been known about since 2014, when the ship was launched. Basically the top coats were applied in conditions that were more humid than expected and have since begun delaminating from the primer. The contractor is rectifying the problem at their own expense and it will not delay the start of sea trials The three month delay in the start of those trials is more likely to be a penny pinching ploy from the government, yes they really are that petty, it'll be more to do with the MOD having to balance their budget for this quarter and coming up with desperate economy measures. I find it easier to believe something of that nature than any major defect in the ship, which those on board were reporting as being ready for the March Sea Trials as late as February. MOD then say 'We need to save some cash for the next few months, stay where you are 'til the summer!'oops
New supercarrier faces paint problems
source is the one popular here:
source:A new flight simulator for the F-35B Lightning II aircraft is now ready to help prepare pilots to take the real aircraft on flight trials on the Royal Navy’s new aircraft carrier HMS Queen Elizabeth next year.
The simulator will test pilots’ skills to the limits as they practise landing on the deck of the new aircraft carrier in a range of sea and weather conditions provided by the simulator, British defense technology company BAE Systems announced on Wednesday.
BAE Systems said the £2M simulator facility offers a 360-degree immersive experience for pilots to fly the jet to and from the UK carrier. It comprises a cockpit moved by an electronic motion platform and a full representation of the ship’s flying control tower (FLYCO), where a landing signal officer on board the carrier will control aviation operations.
Over the coming months the simulator will be used by UK and US military test pilots who have experience of flying F-35s on US carriers.
The pilots will practise ski jump short take-offs and vertical landings that use both the vertical thrust from the jet engine and aerodynamic lift from the wings, allowing the aircraft to take-off and land on the carrier with increased weapon and fuel loads compared to predecessor aircraft.
Peter ‘Wizzer’ Wilson, BAE Systems’ test pilot for the short take-off and vertical landing variant on the F-35 programme, said the simulator trials will provide engineers with the data to begin flight trials on HMS Queen Elizabeth, the First of Class aircraft carrier in 2018.
“The immersive experience is as near to the real thing as possible. The data will show us exactly what will happen when F-35 pilots fly to and from the Queen Elizabeth carriers,” Wilson said. “The trials we can run through the simulator are far more extensive than what we will do in the actual flight trials because we can run and re-run each trial until we have all the data we need. The simulator provides greater cost efficiency for the overall programme and is extremely important to the success of the first flight trials.”
The new simulator replaces a previous version which was first built in the 1980s to develop technology for the Harrier jump-jet and the Hawk advanced jet trainer before being converted for F-35.