considering the state of the Royal Canadian Navy and Air force.... your both wrong.
- the Canadian destroyer and escort fleet is in bad shape. If Canada wanted to spend money on there fleet there best investment would be a modern fleet of Destroyers. that should be there priority if they intend to get a Amphib fleet as said amphb would need escorts and the most the Canadians can muster on there own is one destroyer slated to retire and Frigates
- A Mistral buy would not favor the Us it would Favor the French, This is not the first word on this by the way the Joint Support Ship program and Amphibious Assault Ship Project have been around since 2008.
- The Canadian navy lacks any Amphibious connectors, No LCAC
- The Canadian Military operates differently then the US Or PLA, the Royal Canadian Air Force operate all Aircraft Fixed wing and Rotary. in terms of Transport Choppers The RCAF is not so good. the are operating either older units stretched to there lifespan or small numbers of modern types. In Operations in Iraq and Afghanistan they had to rent Choppers. there primary chopper is the CH146 Griffon. a civilian chopper mounting guns. optimum use of a Mistral is as a LHA/D using Vtol fighters, best being F35B second best being Harrier, after that you need a combat chopper like Apache or Cobra. Canada has 0 attack choppers and 0 Vtol fighters.
- Finally we move to the Canadian Army. fine troops, no Amphibious capacity. they can ford, they can riverine they cant cross a ocean.
To be blunt They are a navy in piss poor shape for a Amphib, No real escorts, no mission air capabilities, no Sea Capabilities. If Canada wanted in on Amphibious capabilities they would need a massive investment requiring buys of basically the entire force.
The Russian Navy had at least the base line of needs Landing craft, attack aircraft with Vtol, and escorts.