We all know about the mother would told her son he should fly low and slow.Its not the politics, but the practice of the USN, and as Jeff stated, the deck can be brought up to any spec desired as illustrated by the Wasp. It is not in the dogma or doctrine of the USN to to build ramps on Catobar carriers since the Catobar system is far more capable, and in my opinion as a pilot, it is far safer to be launched with flying speed, than to jump off the end of the deck at high alpha and low airspeed. I have made most of my departures off of a short sod strip, if the grass is tall, the field is short or soft, a cylinder a little low on compression, the airplane has a cruise prop, the nose gear strut flat or underinflated, same with tires, the airplane over gross, too many or to large a load, too much fuel, or there are obstructions, you will reduce airspeed from best rate to best angle of climb. As you do the pucker factor goes way up, add adverse winds, weather, or darkness and the odds of an accident or incident go way up, so no thanks to a ramp, I'm certain a very high percentage of USN pilots would agree, speed is life, especially off the deck on departure!
The point about the ski ramp is that you do not depart at a high alpha. You depart at a pretty low alpha so you would follow a semi-parabolic trajectory that gives you a good time to accelerate to flying speed or, if something is seriously wrong, to leave your office. I would think you have more time to analyse the situation and decide when you leave over a ski ramp than when you are catapulted from a flat deck. But I didn't make the calculations.