Aircraft Carriers II (Closed to posting)

Status
Not open for further replies.

bd popeye

The Last Jedi
VIP Professional
On the FID that day 134 had lost their lives, while an additional 64 were injured.

What's the FID? The Forrestal's nickname..

First
In
Defense

Some photos of the Forrestal flight deck being turned into a living perdition.

1-838.jpg


2-816.jpg


3-192.jpg


4-183.jpg


5-162.jpg


6-121.jpg


7-103.jpg
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
Incidentally the A4 that took the hit was assigned too Lt Commander Fred D. White, among the flight reading too take off the flight deck of the Forrestal was Lt. commander Herbert A. Hope who after jumping from cockpit in between cookoff's rolled into one of man over board nets climbed intoo the hanger deck and took charge of the firefighters Also there was one Lt. Commander John Sidney McCain III... Who also escaped the fire and later would become better known for his time as a Prisoner of war and Then Senator from the State of Arizona as well as on again off again Republican Nominee for President of the United states of America.
 

kroko

Senior Member
news of russian aircraft carriers

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


It said that they would start construction in 2018. Last i know, they wouldnt be buiding new carriers until 2020

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Now it seems that russia wont build any carriers before 2020, as told before

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


it seems that there is discord betwen the MoD and industry about this. What i find odd is that they make this discord for the public to see.
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Here's a new link on my Worldwideaircraftcarriers.com site:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Click on the links to the three categories for high res comparisons of each type.

Carriers are not out of style, and their age is far from over. The numbers and varietes are escalating.

Enjoy.
 

Obi Wan Russell

Jedi Master
VIP Professional
Great work as always Jeff, though I've long felt their should be a fourth category added to the three well known types of carrier, and if things had gone differently in the 60s we would have seen it. The best way to get a heavily laden aircraft off the deck is by catapult (max weapon and fuel loads leaves the deck at flying speed), followed by the ski jump (restricted fuel or weapon loads, but increased safety in case of engine failure on takeoff) and then the flat rolling takeoff (for a ctol type you'd need the whole length of the deck and you couldn't take any weapons or much fuel with you!). At the other end of operations, vertical landing is the safest form of recovery (you stop, then land at a gentle pace) and 'trapping' with arrestor wires is the most dangerous (you land then stop. Really fast! Danger of wires breaking killing deck crew and losing the plane).

So why has no one thought of combining the two safest and most efficient mthods of takeof and recovery? Well we did back in the sixties. The Supersonic Harrier P1154RN was designed to be launched by catapult from existing carriers (and was the first RN aircraft designed for nose tow launching) in order to takeoff with a full weapons and fuel load. Recovery was to be vertical, already proven with the first trials of the P1127 aboard Ark Royal R09 in 1963. Arrestor wires were to be retained aboard the carriers as conventional types such as the Buccaneer, Gannet and visiting USN aircraft were still to be operated, but this was seen as a first step towards a new method of deck ops. CATOVL? A great 'what if' certainly.
 

Attachments

  • P1154-Seadart-Tychon-2m.jpg
    P1154-Seadart-Tychon-2m.jpg
    29.9 KB · Views: 10
  • P1154rn 03.jpg
    P1154rn 03.jpg
    62.3 KB · Views: 7
  • P1040059Large.jpg
    P1040059Large.jpg
    37.9 KB · Views: 6
  • P1040069Large.jpg
    P1040069Large.jpg
    41.1 KB · Views: 7
  • P1154RN 01.jpg
    P1154RN 01.jpg
    28.9 KB · Views: 6

bd popeye

The Last Jedi
VIP Professional
Jeff posted this in the PLAN CV thread..
and you know lots, my friend. Your experience and many others with equal experience have said the same...but politicians (both in and out of the service) decided otherwise, and have lessened the capabilty and (IMHO) the defense of these great vessels as a result.

For example, a replacement for the Phoenix missile system (the ALRAAM) is still needed, though the AMRAAM has good legs, they still do not come close to the Phoenix...and for fleet defense, those extra miles mean a lot.

If Big Daddy Popeye had anything to do with it this is how an USN CVW would look...right now..

24 F-14s..latest variants :)miss those Tomcats!
40 Super Hornets
8 S-3 Variants
* 6 ASW
* 2 Tankers
4 Growlers/Prowlers
5 E-2D Hawkeyes
8 SH-60 variants
2 C-2 Greyhounds logistical support.

That's 91 aircraft my friend. In 1981 I was deployed on the USS America (CV 66) to the Mediterranean Sea and Indian ocean. On the America we had an 92 aircraft airwing. Yes it did fit rather snugly on CV 66 but it did fit!
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Great work as always Jeff, though I've long felt their should be a fourth category added to the three well known types of carrier, and if things had gone differently in the 60s we would have seen it. The best way to get a heavily laden aircraft off the deck is by catapult (max weapon and fuel loads leaves the deck at flying speed), followed by the ski jump (restricted fuel or weapon loads, but increased safety in case of engine failure on takeoff) and then the flat rolling takeoff (for a ctol type you'd need the whole length of the deck and you couldn't take any weapons or much fuel with you!). At the other end of operations, vertical landing is the safest form of recovery (you stop, then land at a gentle pace) and 'trapping' with arrestor wires is the most dangerous (you land then stop. Really fast! Danger of wires breaking killing deck crew and losing the plane).

So why has no one thought of combining the two safest and most efficient mthods of takeof and recovery? Well we did back in the sixties. The Supersonic Harrier P1154RN was designed to be launched by catapult from existing carriers (and was the first RN aircraft designed for nose tow launching) in order to takeoff with a full weapons and fuel load. Recovery was to be vertical, already proven with the first trials of the P1127 aboard Ark Royal R09 in 1963. Arrestor wires were to be retained aboard the carriers as conventional types such as the Buccaneer, Gannet and visiting USN aircraft were still to be operated, but this was seen as a first step towards a new method of deck ops. CATOVL? A great 'what if' certainly.
With the JSF B variant...it would be possible again.

BTW, check out my update to the QE page on my Aircraft Carrier Site. You'll like it.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
True. It makes you wonder will the Mistral deal really come through??
Well, we know the French have built two and have just finished the third for themselves. So they now have three.

On another matter, here's a new Carrier Comparison pic I made...of all the carriers. Enjoy!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top