2026 Israel-US vs. Iran conflict [Military updates/News Only]

Faisal Iqbal

Junior Member
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
The knock-on effects of the conflict now whipping through the Middle East are awakening ghosts of crises past that shook the European Union.

Seven months into Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, launched in February 2022, the President of the European Commission stood at her podium in the European Parliament and accused Russia of manipulating the EU's energy market.

"They prefer to flare the gas than to deliver it," proclaimed Ursula von der Leyen, as spiralling energy prices hit consumers across the continent. "This market is not functioning anymore."

"This is a war on our energy, a war on our economy, a war on our values and a war on our future," she declared, insisting that Europe was already pivoting away from Russian gas and toward more dependable partners such as the US and Norway.
But fast forward four years and you find deep energy-linked frustration in the heart of Europe once again.

"We swore we'd learn. We promised things would change but here we are," a highly frustrated European diplomat told me. He asked for anonymity so as to be able to speak openly.

The focus of his teeth grinding was Europe's growing energy shock, triggered by the burning conflict in the Middle East and threatening to dominate a summit of European leaders in Brussels on Thursday.
 

_killuminati_

Captain
Registered Member
Sounds like the occupation of Tehran is the objective.

I'm surprised he used Eisenhower for the analogy considering the Americans couldn't scale the German Atlantic Wall until there were just a few months left in the war with the Germans already having lost most their military in the Eastern Theater, and ofcourse, the fact that Russians got to Berlin before the Americans. Unless he is trying to insinuate "our allies will conquer Tehran", then yes, it's an acceptable analogy.
_______

IMG_20260319_040749_508.jpg
IMG_20260319_041159_041.jpg






First footage of a maneuverable ballistic missile or a damaged system?
 

horse

Brigadier
Registered Member
You have it backwards. If you want to argue that the current round of assassinations are working, the burden of proof really is on you to demonstrate how any of these successful assassinations have contributed to reducing Iranian attacks and war fighting capabilities.

If there is no observable impact, then what does that say about the effectiveness of this strategy?

Israel always does this, they killed every single Palestinian leader recently after Arafat left the scene, that was the strategy, to kill the leadership then immediately kill the next guy promoted.

The rationale behind that strategy is that with the world clamoring for negotiations to the Palestinian issue, the Israelis government would say they have no one to talk to.

The same rationale seems to be applied here, just keep killing Iranian leaders, so no chance of peace talks, and maybe cause some confusion for the enemy.

That is why I believe that Natenyahu disappearance is truly significant. Either he is dead, or there is no one to talk to about any ceasefire.
 

horse

Brigadier
Registered Member
Reading posts in previous pages, I'd like to ask; is it time for ground invasion?

How can they do that? That is a question that no one in the entire world has an answer.

It is what Carl von Clausewitz said, that you got to mass or concentrate the force, then attack.

So, the United States must mass a force somewhere, from which it can launch an attack or invasion. But, all you base belong to us. Iranian missiles work.

At the height of the Vietnam War for the Americans, there was over 600,000 troops in South Vietnam. They will need such numbers again and probably more. They need to reinstate the draft. Yes, the same draft that their current president was able to evade five times.

That Kharg Island idea is pure lunacy. The United States does not have air superiority, and Iran can hit that island with artillery hidden in the mountains.

It is kind of bizarre. It is like the Americans cannot accept they have no more bases left in the region to mount such an operation, but still talk like they do. No, they have no capability to do this.

The United States is outgunned in this fight. Iran has home field advantage. The United States is outgunned, plain and simple.

Only one side is running out of ammo. We can be sure about that.

:oops::D
 

Gloire_bb

Colonel
Registered Member

plawolf

Lieutenant General
K
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!




More reinforcements coming beyond the marines. The invasion of Iran is already in the works and we all know how the ladder will be climbed.

Step 1) Occupying the Iranian Shoreline to protect the ships
Step 2) Occupying the Iranian Mountains to protect the troops protecting the ships
Step 3) Occupying the Iranian Interior to protect the troops who is protecting the mountains
Step 4) Occupying the Iranian Capital to protect the troops deep in Iran.

That’s a hilariously optimistic sequence of events.

My possibly more likely escalation ladder is:
Step 1) Storm Qeshm islands to establish a toe hold in preparation for assaulting the coastline proper.
Step 2) Invasion force gets drowned in FPVs and artillery.
Step 3) Send in second invasion force to recover the bodies of the first.
Repeat steps 2 and 3 endlessly.
 

Temstar

Brigadier
Registered Member
Summer of 2022 "Russia has 3 weeks of missiles left" vibes. Considering Israel is the priority, the Gulf states will be left even more defenseless

Someone did the calculation and proportionally, IRGC TELs have higher survivability rate than Iranian leaders.
Makes sense, TEL and they crew know they are hunted so they relocate often when out and about and once they've done their business they diligently go back to their tunnel and hide there instead of go home to their family.
 

obj 705A

Junior Member
Registered Member
Twelve Arab and Islamic countries condemn the Iranian attacks and demand their immediate cessation.

The foreign ministers of Qatar, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Egypt, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Turkey, and the United Arab Emirates condemned Iran’s repeated attacks on a number of countries in the region during their consultative ministerial meeting held yesterday, Wednesday, in the Saudi capital, Riyadh.

The meeting stressed that the future of relations with Iran depends on respecting the sovereignty of states and not interfering in their internal affairs, not using military capabilities to threaten the countries of the region, and complying with Security Council Resolution 2817 (2026), including stopping any attacks or provocative acts, refraining from supporting and arming militias in Arab countries, and not threatening international navigation in the Strait of Hormuz and Bab al-Mandab.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

__________________________________

It appears most countries. Including (but of course not limited to) Pakistan, Turkey, Azerbaijan are afraid of showing themselves as enemies to Saudi Arabia due to the importance of the KSA not just in terms of oil but also because the KSA has big religious influence in the muslim world. And the KSA is making maximum use out of it by putting even countries like Russia and China on the spot "do you support these Iranian attacks on our land or not?" If any one says yes then they will be portraid as an enemy not just of the KSA but of the muslim world.

If Iran wants to win and kick the US out of the middle east. They have to topple the GCC governments especially that of the KSA.

Iran cannot continue on being nice towards the GCC. They have to hit them just as hard as they hit Israel if not even harder. No holds barred.

I believe the reason why Iran is still holding back against the KSA is actually for the same reason why you have countries taking the side of the KSA condemning Iran while not mentioning the attacks on Iran as an issue, and that is because Iran at the top level still doesn't want to burn all bridges with the KSA and hopes that one day if Iran prevails in this war the KSA will have better friendlier relations with Iran.

I believe that is a false hope.

Idealy (though probably not smart to do) The Houthis need to mobilize and once the US' military position in the mid east is severly weakened Iran should focus its fire on Saudi military positions and pave the way for the Houthis to do (as Trump would say) an "excursion" in the KSA to topple the government there.
 
Top